让我们来解决争议--海绵是一种安全的血管内栓塞剂。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae047
Warren Clements, Matthew Lukies, Adil Zia, Mark Fitzgerald, Helen Kavnoudias
{"title":"让我们来解决争议--海绵是一种安全的血管内栓塞剂。","authors":"Warren Clements, Matthew Lukies, Adil Zia, Mark Fitzgerald, Helen Kavnoudias","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A 2021 safety alert restricted endovascular gelfoam use in Australia and resulted in an embargo on gelfoam sales to Interventional Radiology departments. This study aimed to show that gelfoam is safe in a population of trauma patients with pelvic injury, and discuss the basis of the recent controversies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 January 2010 and 21 May 2021 for the patients who underwent gelfoam embolization for pelvic arterial haemorrhage. Primary outcome was the rate of adverse events related to intravascular gelfoam administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria met in 50 patients, comprising 58% males median age 59.9 years, and median injury severity score 31. There were 0 complications related to gelfoam use and 100% technical success. Thirty-five patients (70%) received a non-targeted embolization approach. All-cause mortality was observed in 5 patients (10%), unrelated to gelfoam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gelfoam is a safe and effective embolic agent in pelvic trauma. Patients are in urgent need of universal on-label registration of endovascular gelfoam products, as it is life-saving in major haemorrhage after trauma.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Endovascular gelfoam is mandatory for a high-quality trauma service, and this study shows that it is safe to use intentionally in the endovascular space. Companies should work with interventional radiologists, sharing and collaborating to ensure positive outcomes for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let us settle the controversy-gelfoam is a safe intravascular embolic agent.\",\"authors\":\"Warren Clements, Matthew Lukies, Adil Zia, Mark Fitzgerald, Helen Kavnoudias\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqae047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A 2021 safety alert restricted endovascular gelfoam use in Australia and resulted in an embargo on gelfoam sales to Interventional Radiology departments. This study aimed to show that gelfoam is safe in a population of trauma patients with pelvic injury, and discuss the basis of the recent controversies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 January 2010 and 21 May 2021 for the patients who underwent gelfoam embolization for pelvic arterial haemorrhage. Primary outcome was the rate of adverse events related to intravascular gelfoam administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria met in 50 patients, comprising 58% males median age 59.9 years, and median injury severity score 31. There were 0 complications related to gelfoam use and 100% technical success. Thirty-five patients (70%) received a non-targeted embolization approach. All-cause mortality was observed in 5 patients (10%), unrelated to gelfoam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gelfoam is a safe and effective embolic agent in pelvic trauma. Patients are in urgent need of universal on-label registration of endovascular gelfoam products, as it is life-saving in major haemorrhage after trauma.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Endovascular gelfoam is mandatory for a high-quality trauma service, and this study shows that it is safe to use intentionally in the endovascular space. Companies should work with interventional radiologists, sharing and collaborating to ensure positive outcomes for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2021年的安全警报限制了澳大利亚血管内胶的使用,并导致禁止向红外部门销售胶。本研究旨在证明在骨盆损伤的创伤患者中使用凝胶泡沫是安全的,并讨论近期争议的基础:方法:2010年1月1日至2021年5月21日期间,对因骨盆动脉出血而接受凝胶栓塞治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结果是与血管内使用凝胶泡沫相关的不良事件发生率:50名患者符合纳入标准,其中58%为男性,中位年龄为59.9岁,中位损伤严重程度评分为31分。与使用凝胶泡沫有关的并发症为 0 例,技术成功率为 100%。35名患者(70%)接受了非靶向栓塞治疗。有5名患者(10%)出现全因死亡,与凝胶泡沫无关:结论:在骨盆创伤中,凝胶泡沫是一种安全有效的栓塞剂。患者急需对血管内胶棉产品进行标签上的普遍登记,因为它在创伤后大出血中可以挽救生命:这项研究表明,有意在血管内使用这种产品是安全的。公司应与介入放射科医生合作,分享和协作,确保为患者带来积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Let us settle the controversy-gelfoam is a safe intravascular embolic agent.

Objectives: A 2021 safety alert restricted endovascular gelfoam use in Australia and resulted in an embargo on gelfoam sales to Interventional Radiology departments. This study aimed to show that gelfoam is safe in a population of trauma patients with pelvic injury, and discuss the basis of the recent controversies.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 January 2010 and 21 May 2021 for the patients who underwent gelfoam embolization for pelvic arterial haemorrhage. Primary outcome was the rate of adverse events related to intravascular gelfoam administration.

Results: Inclusion criteria met in 50 patients, comprising 58% males median age 59.9 years, and median injury severity score 31. There were 0 complications related to gelfoam use and 100% technical success. Thirty-five patients (70%) received a non-targeted embolization approach. All-cause mortality was observed in 5 patients (10%), unrelated to gelfoam.

Conclusions: Gelfoam is a safe and effective embolic agent in pelvic trauma. Patients are in urgent need of universal on-label registration of endovascular gelfoam products, as it is life-saving in major haemorrhage after trauma.

Advances in knowledge: Endovascular gelfoam is mandatory for a high-quality trauma service, and this study shows that it is safe to use intentionally in the endovascular space. Companies should work with interventional radiologists, sharing and collaborating to ensure positive outcomes for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Calculating Optic Nerve Planning Organ at Risk Volume Margins for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Optic Nerve Motion determined using MRI. Paediatric magnetoencephalography and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions. Acceptance and results of cryoablation for the treatment of early breast cancer in non-surgical patients. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1