预测心衰患者的死亡和再住院风险:采用机器学习方法的回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1002/clc.24239
Marzieh Ketabi MSc, Aref Andishgar MD, Zhila Fereidouni PhD, Maryam Mojarrad Sani MD, MPH, Ashkan Abdollahi MD, Mohebat Vali PhD, Abdulhakim Alkamel MD, Reza Tabrizi PhD
{"title":"预测心衰患者的死亡和再住院风险:采用机器学习方法的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Marzieh Ketabi MSc,&nbsp;Aref Andishgar MD,&nbsp;Zhila Fereidouni PhD,&nbsp;Maryam Mojarrad Sani MD, MPH,&nbsp;Ashkan Abdollahi MD,&nbsp;Mohebat Vali PhD,&nbsp;Abdulhakim Alkamel MD,&nbsp;Reza Tabrizi PhD","doi":"10.1002/clc.24239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Heart failure (HF) is a global problem, affecting more than 26 million people worldwide. This study evaluated the performance of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms and chose the best algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using The Fasa Registry on Systolic HF (FaRSH) database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>ML algorithms may better identify patients at increased risk of HF readmission or death with demographic and clinical data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through comprehensive evaluation, the best-performing model was used for prediction. Finally, all the trained models were applied to the test data, which included 20% of the total data. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten ML algorithms were evaluated. The CatBoost (CAT) algorithm uses a series of decision tree models to create a nonlinear model, and this CAT algorithm performed the best of the 10 models studied. According to the three final outcomes from this study, which involved 2488 participants, 366 (14.7%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital, 97 (3.9%) of the patients died within 1 month of the follow-up, and 342 (13.7%) of the patients died within 1 year of the follow-up. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level, and family history of MI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The ML-based risk stratification tool was able to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF. ML could provide an explicit explanation of individualized risk prediction and give physicians an intuitive understanding of the influence of critical features in the model.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients: A retrospective cohort study by machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Marzieh Ketabi MSc,&nbsp;Aref Andishgar MD,&nbsp;Zhila Fereidouni PhD,&nbsp;Maryam Mojarrad Sani MD, MPH,&nbsp;Ashkan Abdollahi MD,&nbsp;Mohebat Vali PhD,&nbsp;Abdulhakim Alkamel MD,&nbsp;Reza Tabrizi PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.24239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Heart failure (HF) is a global problem, affecting more than 26 million people worldwide. This study evaluated the performance of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms and chose the best algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using The Fasa Registry on Systolic HF (FaRSH) database.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>ML algorithms may better identify patients at increased risk of HF readmission or death with demographic and clinical data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through comprehensive evaluation, the best-performing model was used for prediction. Finally, all the trained models were applied to the test data, which included 20% of the total data. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten ML algorithms were evaluated. The CatBoost (CAT) algorithm uses a series of decision tree models to create a nonlinear model, and this CAT algorithm performed the best of the 10 models studied. According to the three final outcomes from this study, which involved 2488 participants, 366 (14.7%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital, 97 (3.9%) of the patients died within 1 month of the follow-up, and 342 (13.7%) of the patients died within 1 year of the follow-up. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level, and family history of MI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ML-based risk stratification tool was able to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF. ML could provide an explicit explanation of individualized risk prediction and give physicians an intuitive understanding of the influence of critical features in the model.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24239\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一个全球性问题,影响着全球2600多万人。本研究评估了 10 种机器学习(ML)算法的性能,并利用 Fasa 收缩性心力衰竭登记(FaRSH)数据库选出了预测心力衰竭患者死亡率和再入院率的最佳算法:假设:通过人口统计学和临床数据,ML 算法可以更好地识别高血压再入院或死亡风险增加的患者:方法:通过综合评估,采用表现最佳的模型进行预测。最后,将所有训练有素的模型应用于测试数据,测试数据占总数据的 20%。在对模型进行最终评估和比较时,使用了五个指标:准确率、F1-分数、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC):结果:共评估了 10 种 ML 算法。CatBoost(CAT)算法使用一系列决策树模型来创建一个非线性模型,该 CAT 算法在所研究的 10 个模型中表现最佳。本研究共有 2488 名参与者,根据本研究的三项最终结果,366 名患者(14.7%)再次入院,97 名患者(3.9%)在随访 1 个月内死亡,342 名患者(13.7%)在随访 1 年内死亡。预测事件发生的最重要变量是住院时间、血红蛋白水平和心肌梗死家族史:结论:基于ML的风险分层工具能够评估心房颤动患者5年全因死亡和再入院的风险。ML可为个体化风险预测提供明确的解释,并让医生直观地了解模型中关键特征的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients: A retrospective cohort study by machine learning approach

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a global problem, affecting more than 26 million people worldwide. This study evaluated the performance of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms and chose the best algorithm to predict mortality and readmission of HF patients by using The Fasa Registry on Systolic HF (FaRSH) database.

Hypothesis

ML algorithms may better identify patients at increased risk of HF readmission or death with demographic and clinical data.

Methods

Through comprehensive evaluation, the best-performing model was used for prediction. Finally, all the trained models were applied to the test data, which included 20% of the total data. For the final evaluation and comparison of the models, five metrics were used: accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC).

Results

Ten ML algorithms were evaluated. The CatBoost (CAT) algorithm uses a series of decision tree models to create a nonlinear model, and this CAT algorithm performed the best of the 10 models studied. According to the three final outcomes from this study, which involved 2488 participants, 366 (14.7%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital, 97 (3.9%) of the patients died within 1 month of the follow-up, and 342 (13.7%) of the patients died within 1 year of the follow-up. The most significant variables to predict the events were length of stay in the hospital, hemoglobin level, and family history of MI.

Conclusions

The ML-based risk stratification tool was able to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF. ML could provide an explicit explanation of individualized risk prediction and give physicians an intuitive understanding of the influence of critical features in the model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Cardiovascular Health (Life's Essential 8) and Mental Disorders A Predictive Nomogram of In-Hospital Mortality After 48 h for Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the Coronary Care Unit Is There a Need for Sex-Tailored Lipoprotein(a) Cut-Off Values for Coronary Artery Disease Risk Stratification? Anticoagulant Impact on Clinical Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism Compared With Thrombolytic Therapy; Meta-Analysis Bridging With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1