我们还需要 Crile 或 Hayes Martin 方法进行颈淋巴结切除术吗?对 56 例颈部微创切除术患者的回顾性研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.016
Anna Sayan, Thirilosanan Ganesarajah, Nall Baheerathan, Velupillai Ilankovan
{"title":"我们还需要 Crile 或 Hayes Martin 方法进行颈淋巴结切除术吗?对 56 例颈部微创切除术患者的回顾性研究","authors":"Anna Sayan,&nbsp;Thirilosanan Ganesarajah,&nbsp;Nall Baheerathan,&nbsp;Velupillai Ilankovan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of neck dissection was introduced by Crile more than a century ago. Since then, multiple modifications have been adopted to ensure the preservation of vital structures. With the new era of minimal access surgery, the incorporation of laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery is becoming the new normal. Over the years we have carried out neck dissections using minimal access incisions. Although there is no definitive answer about the average nodal yield required in selective or modified neck dissections, it has been reported that the average nodal yield of more than 18 is associated with better survival rate. In this publication we share the results of our three-year retrospective study of 56 patients who underwent minimal access neck dissection. We look at the nodal yield, assess operating duration, complications, outcome with a three-year follow up from a single unit. Our results demonstrate that minimal access neck dissection should be considered in head and neck lymphadenectomies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we still need Crile or Hayes Martin approach for cervical lymphadenectomy? A retrospective study of 56 patients with minimal access neck dissection\",\"authors\":\"Anna Sayan,&nbsp;Thirilosanan Ganesarajah,&nbsp;Nall Baheerathan,&nbsp;Velupillai Ilankovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The concept of neck dissection was introduced by Crile more than a century ago. Since then, multiple modifications have been adopted to ensure the preservation of vital structures. With the new era of minimal access surgery, the incorporation of laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery is becoming the new normal. Over the years we have carried out neck dissections using minimal access incisions. Although there is no definitive answer about the average nodal yield required in selective or modified neck dissections, it has been reported that the average nodal yield of more than 18 is associated with better survival rate. In this publication we share the results of our three-year retrospective study of 56 patients who underwent minimal access neck dissection. We look at the nodal yield, assess operating duration, complications, outcome with a three-year follow up from a single unit. Our results demonstrate that minimal access neck dissection should be considered in head and neck lymphadenectomies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435624000457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435624000457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个多世纪前,Crile 提出了颈部解剖的概念。从那时起,为了确保保留重要结构,人们对其进行了多次修改。随着微创手术进入新时代,腹腔镜、内窥镜和机器人手术的应用正在成为新常态。多年来,我们一直使用微创切口进行颈部解剖。虽然关于选择性或改良性颈部解剖所需的平均结节率还没有明确的答案,但有报道称,平均结节率超过 18 个与较高的生存率有关。在这篇论文中,我们分享了对 56 位接受微创颈部切除术的患者进行的为期三年的回顾性研究结果。我们研究了结节切除率,评估了手术时间、并发症、单个单位三年随访的结果。我们的研究结果表明,在头颈部淋巴结切除术中应考虑采用微创颈部清扫术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do we still need Crile or Hayes Martin approach for cervical lymphadenectomy? A retrospective study of 56 patients with minimal access neck dissection

The concept of neck dissection was introduced by Crile more than a century ago. Since then, multiple modifications have been adopted to ensure the preservation of vital structures. With the new era of minimal access surgery, the incorporation of laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery is becoming the new normal. Over the years we have carried out neck dissections using minimal access incisions. Although there is no definitive answer about the average nodal yield required in selective or modified neck dissections, it has been reported that the average nodal yield of more than 18 is associated with better survival rate. In this publication we share the results of our three-year retrospective study of 56 patients who underwent minimal access neck dissection. We look at the nodal yield, assess operating duration, complications, outcome with a three-year follow up from a single unit. Our results demonstrate that minimal access neck dissection should be considered in head and neck lymphadenectomies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Training groups / Instructions to Authors Comment on: Risk prediction of complicated course in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Extreme and remarkable adaptations of oral cancer survivors in Sri Lanka. Outcomes of incidental pulmonary nodules detected in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1