关于不同社会等级地位的情感评价如何影响决策的 fMRI 研究

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6
Zibin Guo, Zehui Xing, Linyan Liu, John W. Schwieter, Huanhuan Liu
{"title":"关于不同社会等级地位的情感评价如何影响决策的 fMRI 研究","authors":"Zibin Guo, Zehui Xing, Linyan Liu, John W. Schwieter, Huanhuan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Expectation States Theory suggests that social status carries emotions, with higher statuses producing positive emotions and lower statuses leading to negative emotions. However, the theory is broad and lacks empirical evidence. This study investigated whether positive and negative evaluations from positions of higher and lower social hierarchies affect decisions. We examined whether decision making is influenced when evaluations were given in a first (L1) versus second language (L2). Bilinguals read scenarios in which they imagined themselves in the middle of the hierarchy. They then made a series of decisions, each of which was preceded with an evaluative word from other individuals whose hierarchical positions were higher or lower. The behavioral results showed that negative evaluations from higher positions exerted greater impact on decisions than when negative evaluations came from a lower position. At the neural level, after receiving negative evaluations, a higher hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right AI compared to a lower hierarchy, which may be caused by the view that a negative evaluation from a higher hierarchy is criticism. Conversely, after receiving positive evaluations, the lower hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI and right IPS compared to the higher hierarchy, which may be due to the fact that positive evaluations from positions of lower hierarchies are perceived as encouraging. Together, these findings support Expectation States Theory in that regardless of whether evaluative advice is given in an L1 or L2, there is an internal association between social status and social-emotional neural responses that are localized in the frontal–parietal and visual cortices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An fMRI study on how decisions are influenced by affective evaluations from different social hierarchical positions\",\"authors\":\"Zibin Guo, Zehui Xing, Linyan Liu, John W. Schwieter, Huanhuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Expectation States Theory suggests that social status carries emotions, with higher statuses producing positive emotions and lower statuses leading to negative emotions. However, the theory is broad and lacks empirical evidence. This study investigated whether positive and negative evaluations from positions of higher and lower social hierarchies affect decisions. We examined whether decision making is influenced when evaluations were given in a first (L1) versus second language (L2). Bilinguals read scenarios in which they imagined themselves in the middle of the hierarchy. They then made a series of decisions, each of which was preceded with an evaluative word from other individuals whose hierarchical positions were higher or lower. The behavioral results showed that negative evaluations from higher positions exerted greater impact on decisions than when negative evaluations came from a lower position. At the neural level, after receiving negative evaluations, a higher hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right AI compared to a lower hierarchy, which may be caused by the view that a negative evaluation from a higher hierarchy is criticism. Conversely, after receiving positive evaluations, the lower hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI and right IPS compared to the higher hierarchy, which may be due to the fact that positive evaluations from positions of lower hierarchies are perceived as encouraging. Together, these findings support Expectation States Theory in that regardless of whether evaluative advice is given in an L1 or L2, there is an internal association between social status and social-emotional neural responses that are localized in the frontal–parietal and visual cortices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

期望状态理论认为,社会地位会带来情绪,地位越高,情绪越积极,地位越低,情绪越消极。然而,该理论较为宽泛,缺乏实证证据。本研究调查了社会地位高低的正面和负面评价是否会影响决策。我们研究了用第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)进行评价时,决策是否会受到影响。双语者阅读了他们想象自己处于等级中间的情景。然后,他们做出了一系列决定,每一个决定之前都有一个来自等级位置更高或更低的其他人的评价性词语。行为结果显示,与来自较低位置的负面评价相比,来自较高位置的负面评价对决策的影响更大。在神经水平上,在接受负面评价后,与低层次的评价相比,高层次的评价在右侧额叶下回(IFG)、左侧辅助运动区(SMA)、右侧前中央回、左侧纺锤形回、双侧枕下回(IOG)和右侧人工智能(AI)中引起了更大的激活,这可能是由于人们认为来自高层次的负面评价是批评性的。相反,在收到正面评价后,与上级相比,下级的右侧 IFG、左侧 SMA、右侧前中央回、双侧 IOG、右侧 AI 和右侧 IPS 的激活程度更高,这可能是由于下级的正面评价被认为是鼓励性的。总之,这些研究结果支持期望状态理论(Expectation States Theory),即无论评价性建议是以第一语言还是第二语言给出的,社会地位与社会情感神经反应之间都存在内在联系,这种神经反应集中在额顶叶和视觉皮层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An fMRI study on how decisions are influenced by affective evaluations from different social hierarchical positions

Expectation States Theory suggests that social status carries emotions, with higher statuses producing positive emotions and lower statuses leading to negative emotions. However, the theory is broad and lacks empirical evidence. This study investigated whether positive and negative evaluations from positions of higher and lower social hierarchies affect decisions. We examined whether decision making is influenced when evaluations were given in a first (L1) versus second language (L2). Bilinguals read scenarios in which they imagined themselves in the middle of the hierarchy. They then made a series of decisions, each of which was preceded with an evaluative word from other individuals whose hierarchical positions were higher or lower. The behavioral results showed that negative evaluations from higher positions exerted greater impact on decisions than when negative evaluations came from a lower position. At the neural level, after receiving negative evaluations, a higher hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right AI compared to a lower hierarchy, which may be caused by the view that a negative evaluation from a higher hierarchy is criticism. Conversely, after receiving positive evaluations, the lower hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI and right IPS compared to the higher hierarchy, which may be due to the fact that positive evaluations from positions of lower hierarchies are perceived as encouraging. Together, these findings support Expectation States Theory in that regardless of whether evaluative advice is given in an L1 or L2, there is an internal association between social status and social-emotional neural responses that are localized in the frontal–parietal and visual cortices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
A memristor-based circuit design of avoidance learning with time delay and its application Perceptual information processing in table tennis players: based on top-down hierarchical predictive coding EEG-based deception detection using weighted dual perspective visibility graph analysis The dynamical behavior effects of different numbers of discrete memristive synaptic coupled neurons Advancements in automated diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through deep learning and resting-state functional mri biomarkers: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1