在学习过程中采取立场:在以计算机为媒介的同步课堂讨论中通过知识共建培养视角理解能力

IF 4.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x
Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi
{"title":"在学习过程中采取立场:在以计算机为媒介的同步课堂讨论中通过知识共建培养视角理解能力","authors":"Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi","doi":"10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno &amp; van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47189,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking a stance in the process of learning: Developing perspectival understandings through knowledge co-construction during synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussion\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno &amp; van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用杜波依斯(2007 年)关于 "站姿 "的话语研究成果,扩展了关于 "视角理解 "的研究(Greeno & van de Sande, 2007),研究学生在在线讨论中协商意义时,如何通过各种站姿/立场表达他们对课程内容的观点。参与者为研究生混合课程的学生,每周进行一次以计算机为媒介的同步讨论。根据杜波依斯的 "立场三角",我们对讨论记录进行了编码,以了解学生在思考课程概念时立场的转变,以及影响学生观点取向的证据。研究结果表明,学生在合作讨论时引入了立场和立场对象(即话题),其中认识论立场表明学生的主要关注点是希望学习和理解课程概念。评价性和情感性立场较少出现,最常见的是与认识性立场交织在一起,但在支持小组讨论方面也很重要。同步在线讨论为评价、定位和调整的迭代话语互动以及共享知识的共同建构和观点理解提供了场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking a stance in the process of learning: Developing perspectival understandings through knowledge co-construction during synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussion

This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno & van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: An official publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, the International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (IJCSCL) fosters a deep understanding of the nature, theory, and practice of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). The journal serves as a forum for experts from such disciplines as education, computer science, information technology, psychology, communications, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, and business. Articles investigate how to design the technological settings for collaboration and how people learn in the context of collaborative activity.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the effects of a collaboration script and collaborative reflection on promoting knowledge about good collaboration and effective interaction Capturing temporal pathways of collaborative roles: A multilayered analytical approach using community of inquiry Revealing the interplay of cognitive, meta-cognitive, and social processes in university students’ collaborative problem solving: a three-stage analytical framework Knowledge creation through maker practices and the role of teacher and peer support in collaborative invention projects Combining Danmaku and Discussion Boards: Toward A Scalable and Sociable Environment for Mass Collaboration in MOOCs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1