在诊断梅毒感染的两级诊断算法中,评估单独使用特雷波纳菌 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验和结合使用 IgM 酶联免疫吸附试验替代苍白螺旋体特雷波纳菌颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)作为确证试验的效果

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1515/labmed-2023-0142
Nele Wellinghausen, Teresa Esthela Rangel Vivar, Dietmar Plonné
{"title":"在诊断梅毒感染的两级诊断算法中,评估单独使用特雷波纳菌 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验和结合使用 IgM 酶联免疫吸附试验替代苍白螺旋体特雷波纳菌颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)作为确证试验的效果","authors":"Nele Wellinghausen, Teresa Esthela Rangel Vivar, Dietmar Plonné","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2023-0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The <jats:italic>Treponema pallidum</jats:italic> particle agglutination (TPPA) has been used for decades for serological diagnostics of syphilis but is no longer available. Therefore, we evaluated the <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgG ELISA (TpG) alone and in combination with the <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgM ELISA (TpG+M, both from Euroimmun) as possible substitutes for TPPA as a confirmatory test in a two-tier syphilis screening algorithm. Furthermore, we investigated whether a TPPA titer of 5,120 which is used as cut-off for therapeutic decision in pregnant women in Germany can be transferred to an appropriate cut-off value of the TpG. Methods All serum samples with reactive syphilis screening test (CLIA, Diasorin) within a 13-months period were included (n=739). In addition to TPPA and rapid plasma reagin test both ELISA tests were done in all samples. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.2, 100, 100, and 74.5 % for TpG, and 93.2, 85.4, 96.6, and 74.1 % for TpG+M. By ROC analysis the cut-off of TpG corresponding to a TPPA titer ≥5,120 was calculated to be 54 RU/mL with a sensitivity of 99.6 % and a resulting specificity of 58.6 %. Conclusions TpG appears suitable to substitute TPPA as a confirmatory test for syphilis diagnostics but TpG-negative samples have to be evaluated by further tests like FTA-Abs or immunoblot. <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgM determined in addition to TpG did not improve the test performance compared to the TPPA as a reference standard. Valid prediction of a TPPA titer ≥5,120 from TpG result appears not reasonable.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Treponema IgG ELISA alone and in combination with an IgM ELISA as substitutes for Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) as confirmatory tests in a two-tier diagnostic algorithm for diagnosis of syphilis infection\",\"authors\":\"Nele Wellinghausen, Teresa Esthela Rangel Vivar, Dietmar Plonné\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2023-0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The <jats:italic>Treponema pallidum</jats:italic> particle agglutination (TPPA) has been used for decades for serological diagnostics of syphilis but is no longer available. Therefore, we evaluated the <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgG ELISA (TpG) alone and in combination with the <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgM ELISA (TpG+M, both from Euroimmun) as possible substitutes for TPPA as a confirmatory test in a two-tier syphilis screening algorithm. Furthermore, we investigated whether a TPPA titer of 5,120 which is used as cut-off for therapeutic decision in pregnant women in Germany can be transferred to an appropriate cut-off value of the TpG. Methods All serum samples with reactive syphilis screening test (CLIA, Diasorin) within a 13-months period were included (n=739). In addition to TPPA and rapid plasma reagin test both ELISA tests were done in all samples. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.2, 100, 100, and 74.5 % for TpG, and 93.2, 85.4, 96.6, and 74.1 % for TpG+M. By ROC analysis the cut-off of TpG corresponding to a TPPA titer ≥5,120 was calculated to be 54 RU/mL with a sensitivity of 99.6 % and a resulting specificity of 58.6 %. Conclusions TpG appears suitable to substitute TPPA as a confirmatory test for syphilis diagnostics but TpG-negative samples have to be evaluated by further tests like FTA-Abs or immunoblot. <jats:italic>Treponema</jats:italic> IgM determined in addition to TpG did not improve the test performance compared to the TPPA as a reference standard. Valid prediction of a TPPA titer ≥5,120 from TpG result appears not reasonable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 数十年来,苍白螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)一直被用于梅毒的血清学诊断,但现在已无法使用。因此,我们评估了单独使用特雷波母 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(TpG)和结合使用特雷波母 IgM 酶联免疫吸附试验(TpG+M,均由 Euroimmun 公司提供)来替代 TPPA 作为梅毒两级筛查算法中的确证试验的可能性。此外,我们还研究了在德国孕妇中作为治疗决策临界值的 TPPA 滴度 5,120 是否可以转换为 TpG 的适当临界值。方法 纳入所有在 13 个月内进行过梅毒筛查反应试验(CLIA,Diasorin)的血清样本(n=739)。除 TPPA 和快速血浆试剂检测外,还对所有样本进行了 ELISA 检测。结果 TpG 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 92.2%、100%、100% 和 74.5%,TpG+M 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 93.2%、85.4%、96.6% 和 74.1%。通过 ROC 分析,计算出 TPPA 滴度≥5,120 时的 TpG 临界值为 54 RU/mL,灵敏度为 99.6%,特异度为 58.6%。结论 TpG可替代TPPA作为梅毒诊断的确证试验,但TpG阴性样本必须通过FTA-Abs或免疫印迹等进一步试验进行评估。与作为参考标准的 TPPA 相比,在 TpG 之外测定 Treponema IgM 并不能提高检测性能。根据 TpG 结果有效预测 TPPA 滴度≥5,120 似乎并不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Treponema IgG ELISA alone and in combination with an IgM ELISA as substitutes for Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) as confirmatory tests in a two-tier diagnostic algorithm for diagnosis of syphilis infection
Objectives The Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) has been used for decades for serological diagnostics of syphilis but is no longer available. Therefore, we evaluated the Treponema IgG ELISA (TpG) alone and in combination with the Treponema IgM ELISA (TpG+M, both from Euroimmun) as possible substitutes for TPPA as a confirmatory test in a two-tier syphilis screening algorithm. Furthermore, we investigated whether a TPPA titer of 5,120 which is used as cut-off for therapeutic decision in pregnant women in Germany can be transferred to an appropriate cut-off value of the TpG. Methods All serum samples with reactive syphilis screening test (CLIA, Diasorin) within a 13-months period were included (n=739). In addition to TPPA and rapid plasma reagin test both ELISA tests were done in all samples. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.2, 100, 100, and 74.5 % for TpG, and 93.2, 85.4, 96.6, and 74.1 % for TpG+M. By ROC analysis the cut-off of TpG corresponding to a TPPA titer ≥5,120 was calculated to be 54 RU/mL with a sensitivity of 99.6 % and a resulting specificity of 58.6 %. Conclusions TpG appears suitable to substitute TPPA as a confirmatory test for syphilis diagnostics but TpG-negative samples have to be evaluated by further tests like FTA-Abs or immunoblot. Treponema IgM determined in addition to TpG did not improve the test performance compared to the TPPA as a reference standard. Valid prediction of a TPPA titer ≥5,120 from TpG result appears not reasonable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals How Gaussian mixture modelling can help to verify reference intervals from laboratory data with a high proportion of pathological values Using machine learning techniques for exploration and classification of laboratory data Automated sex and age partitioning for the estimation of reference intervals using a regression tree model Serum LDH and its isoenzymes (LDH2 and LDH5) associated with predictive value for refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1