提高野生动物科学领域对 LGBTQ+ 的包容度和能力:社会文化、结构和历史障碍对包容度的交叉影响

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 Environmental Science Wildlife Society Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1002/wsb.1511
Nathan B. Alexander, Douglas Knutson, Loren Lynch, Madeleine Spellman, Michael Rivera, Leslie K. Morrow, Maxine Scherz, Thea E. Clarkberg, Lucas T. Allen-Custodio, Kal Fountain, Isaac Klimasmith, Emmett M. Smith, Jaime J. Coon
{"title":"提高野生动物科学领域对 LGBTQ+ 的包容度和能力:社会文化、结构和历史障碍对包容度的交叉影响","authors":"Nathan B. Alexander, Douglas Knutson, Loren Lynch, Madeleine Spellman, Michael Rivera, Leslie K. Morrow, Maxine Scherz, Thea E. Clarkberg, Lucas T. Allen-Custodio, Kal Fountain, Isaac Klimasmith, Emmett M. Smith, Jaime J. Coon","doi":"10.1002/wsb.1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science has a history of excluding marginalized groups, including people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other marginalized gender and sexual identities (LGBTQ+), and recent calls urge the wildlife sciences to address disparities. Literature on inclusion in the life sciences generally has focused on personal affirmation and has neglected comprehensive discussion of barriers rooted in historical, structural, and sociocultural context. In our literature review, we construct a narrative highlighting the intersections between historic LGBTQ+ exclusion in society and wildlife science due to current policy trends, pressures of cis-heteronormativity, and survival barriers on LGBTQ+ people in wildlife sciences in the United States. Wildlife scientists must have competency on LGBTQ+ marginalization topics to advance inclusion in our discipline, and this should include comprehension of historic and current legislation and social perceptions. To bolster inclusion efforts, we recommend thoughtful data collection on experiences of LGBTQ+ people within the wildlife sciences. To address root causes of exclusion, institutions and organizations should address disparities in financial support, housing, and physical and mental health resources as part of LGBTQ+ advocacy, in addition to interpersonal efforts.","PeriodicalId":23845,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing LGBTQ+ inclusion & competency in wildlife sciences: intersections of sociocultural, structural, and historic barriers to inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Nathan B. Alexander, Douglas Knutson, Loren Lynch, Madeleine Spellman, Michael Rivera, Leslie K. Morrow, Maxine Scherz, Thea E. Clarkberg, Lucas T. Allen-Custodio, Kal Fountain, Isaac Klimasmith, Emmett M. Smith, Jaime J. Coon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wsb.1511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science has a history of excluding marginalized groups, including people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other marginalized gender and sexual identities (LGBTQ+), and recent calls urge the wildlife sciences to address disparities. Literature on inclusion in the life sciences generally has focused on personal affirmation and has neglected comprehensive discussion of barriers rooted in historical, structural, and sociocultural context. In our literature review, we construct a narrative highlighting the intersections between historic LGBTQ+ exclusion in society and wildlife science due to current policy trends, pressures of cis-heteronormativity, and survival barriers on LGBTQ+ people in wildlife sciences in the United States. Wildlife scientists must have competency on LGBTQ+ marginalization topics to advance inclusion in our discipline, and this should include comprehension of historic and current legislation and social perceptions. To bolster inclusion efforts, we recommend thoughtful data collection on experiences of LGBTQ+ people within the wildlife sciences. To address root causes of exclusion, institutions and organizations should address disparities in financial support, housing, and physical and mental health resources as part of LGBTQ+ advocacy, in addition to interpersonal efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Society Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Society Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学历来排斥边缘化群体,包括女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者以及其他边缘化的性别和性身份(LGBTQ+)。有关生命科学包容性的文献通常侧重于对个人的肯定,而忽视了对历史、结构和社会文化背景下的障碍的全面讨论。在我们的文献综述中,我们构建了一个叙事,强调了历史上社会对 LGBTQ+ 的排斥与野生动物科学之间的交叉,其原因在于当前的政策趋势、顺式异性恋的压力以及美国野生动物科学中 LGBTQ+ 的生存障碍。野生动物科学家必须具备有关 LGBTQ+ 边缘化主题的能力,以促进本学科的包容性,这应包括对历史和当前立法及社会观念的理解。为了加强包容性,我们建议对 LGBTQ+ 在野生动物科学领域的经历进行深思熟虑的数据收集。为了从根本上解决排斥问题,除了人际交往方面的努力之外,各机构和组织还应该解决财政支持、住房和身心健康资源方面的差距,并将此作为 LGBTQ+ 倡导工作的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing LGBTQ+ inclusion & competency in wildlife sciences: intersections of sociocultural, structural, and historic barriers to inclusion
Science has a history of excluding marginalized groups, including people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other marginalized gender and sexual identities (LGBTQ+), and recent calls urge the wildlife sciences to address disparities. Literature on inclusion in the life sciences generally has focused on personal affirmation and has neglected comprehensive discussion of barriers rooted in historical, structural, and sociocultural context. In our literature review, we construct a narrative highlighting the intersections between historic LGBTQ+ exclusion in society and wildlife science due to current policy trends, pressures of cis-heteronormativity, and survival barriers on LGBTQ+ people in wildlife sciences in the United States. Wildlife scientists must have competency on LGBTQ+ marginalization topics to advance inclusion in our discipline, and this should include comprehension of historic and current legislation and social perceptions. To bolster inclusion efforts, we recommend thoughtful data collection on experiences of LGBTQ+ people within the wildlife sciences. To address root causes of exclusion, institutions and organizations should address disparities in financial support, housing, and physical and mental health resources as part of LGBTQ+ advocacy, in addition to interpersonal efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Society Bulletin BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Wildlife Society Bulletin is a journal for wildlife practitioners that effectively integrates cutting edge science with management and conservation, and also covers important policy issues, particularly those that focus on the integration of science and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin includes articles on contemporary wildlife management and conservation, education, administration, law enforcement, and review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. This includes: Reports on practices designed to achieve wildlife management or conservation goals. Presentation of new techniques or evaluation of techniques for studying or managing wildlife. Retrospective analyses of wildlife management and conservation programs, including the reasons for success or failure. Analyses or reports of wildlife policies, regulations, education, administration, law enforcement. Review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. as well as other pertinent topics that are deemed more appropriate for the Wildlife Society Bulletin than for The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews that focus on applied research, policy or wildlife management and conservation.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of semiautomated photographic identification programs for leopard seals The use of orthoimagery and stereoscopic aerial imagery to identify muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) houses Pesticide-free management of invasive ants impacting ground-nesting wildlife populations Considerations for a threatened seabird: The impact of shoreline avian predators on at-sea marbled murrelets Abundance estimates of Gunnison's prairie dogs compared to the number of active burrows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1