复杂交叉口混合车辆的最差响应时间

IF 4.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1109/OJITS.2024.3368797
Radha Reddy;Luis Almeida;Harrison Kurunathan;Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán;Pedro M. Santos;Eduardo Tovar
{"title":"复杂交叉口混合车辆的最差响应时间","authors":"Radha Reddy;Luis Almeida;Harrison Kurunathan;Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán;Pedro M. Santos;Eduardo Tovar","doi":"10.1109/OJITS.2024.3368797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operating autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) at urban intersections while observing requirements of safety and service level is complex due not only to the existence of multiple inflow and outflow lanes, conflicting crossing zones, and low-speed conditions but also due to differences between control mechanisms of HVs and AVs. Intelligent intersection management (IIM) strategies can tackle the coordination of mixed AV/HV intersections while improving intersection throughput and reducing travel delays and fuel wastage in the average case. An endeavor relevant to traffic planning and safety is assessing whether given worst-case service levels can be met. Given a specific arrival pattern, this can be done via the worst-case response time (WCRT) that any vehicle experiences when crossing intersections. In this research line, this paper estimates WCRT upper bounds and discusses the analytical characterization of arrival and service curves, including estimating maximum queue length and associated worst-case waiting time for various traffic arrival patterns. This analysis is then used to compare six state-of-the-art intersection management approaches from conventional to intelligent and synchronous. The analytical results show the advantage of employing a synchronous management approach and are validated with the vehicles floating car data (timestamped location and speed) and simulations carried out using SUMO.","PeriodicalId":100631,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"186-201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10443586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worst-Case Response Time of Mixed Vehicles at Complex Intersections\",\"authors\":\"Radha Reddy;Luis Almeida;Harrison Kurunathan;Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán;Pedro M. Santos;Eduardo Tovar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJITS.2024.3368797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operating autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) at urban intersections while observing requirements of safety and service level is complex due not only to the existence of multiple inflow and outflow lanes, conflicting crossing zones, and low-speed conditions but also due to differences between control mechanisms of HVs and AVs. Intelligent intersection management (IIM) strategies can tackle the coordination of mixed AV/HV intersections while improving intersection throughput and reducing travel delays and fuel wastage in the average case. An endeavor relevant to traffic planning and safety is assessing whether given worst-case service levels can be met. Given a specific arrival pattern, this can be done via the worst-case response time (WCRT) that any vehicle experiences when crossing intersections. In this research line, this paper estimates WCRT upper bounds and discusses the analytical characterization of arrival and service curves, including estimating maximum queue length and associated worst-case waiting time for various traffic arrival patterns. This analysis is then used to compare six state-of-the-art intersection management approaches from conventional to intelligent and synchronous. The analytical results show the advantage of employing a synchronous management approach and are validated with the vehicles floating car data (timestamped location and speed) and simulations carried out using SUMO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"186-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10443586\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10443586/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10443586/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在城市交叉路口运行自动驾驶车辆(AV)和人类驾驶车辆(HV)需要遵守安全和服务水平要求,这不仅是因为存在多条流入和流出车道、冲突交叉区和低速条件,还因为 HV 和 AV 的控制机制存在差异。智能交叉口管理(IIM)策略可以解决 AV/HV 混合交叉口的协调问题,同时提高交叉口的通过率,并在一般情况下减少行车延误和燃料浪费。与交通规划和安全相关的一项工作是评估是否能达到给定的最差服务水平。鉴于特定的到达模式,可以通过任何车辆在通过交叉口时经历的最坏情况响应时间(WCRT)来实现这一目标。在这一研究思路中,本文估算了 WCRT 上限,并讨论了到达和服务曲线的分析特征,包括估算各种交通到达模式的最大队列长度和相关的最坏情况等待时间。然后,利用该分析比较了从传统到智能和同步的六种最先进的交叉口管理方法。分析结果显示了采用同步管理方法的优势,并通过车辆浮动数据(时间戳位置和速度)和使用 SUMO 进行的模拟进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worst-Case Response Time of Mixed Vehicles at Complex Intersections
Operating autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) at urban intersections while observing requirements of safety and service level is complex due not only to the existence of multiple inflow and outflow lanes, conflicting crossing zones, and low-speed conditions but also due to differences between control mechanisms of HVs and AVs. Intelligent intersection management (IIM) strategies can tackle the coordination of mixed AV/HV intersections while improving intersection throughput and reducing travel delays and fuel wastage in the average case. An endeavor relevant to traffic planning and safety is assessing whether given worst-case service levels can be met. Given a specific arrival pattern, this can be done via the worst-case response time (WCRT) that any vehicle experiences when crossing intersections. In this research line, this paper estimates WCRT upper bounds and discusses the analytical characterization of arrival and service curves, including estimating maximum queue length and associated worst-case waiting time for various traffic arrival patterns. This analysis is then used to compare six state-of-the-art intersection management approaches from conventional to intelligent and synchronous. The analytical results show the advantage of employing a synchronous management approach and are validated with the vehicles floating car data (timestamped location and speed) and simulations carried out using SUMO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Vol. 5 Safety-Critical Oracles for Metamorphic Testing of Deep Learning LiDAR Point Cloud Object Detectors Front Cover IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Instructions for Authors IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS SOCIETY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1