青少年双相情感障碍 I 与双相情感障碍 II 的内在网络功能连接异常

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111802
Qian Xiao , Gui Zhang , Yuan Zhong
{"title":"青少年双相情感障碍 I 与双相情感障碍 II 的内在网络功能连接异常","authors":"Qian Xiao ,&nbsp;Gui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The symptoms of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD)-I and PBD-II differ, but accurate identification at an early stage is difficult and may prevent effective treatment of this disorder. Therefore, it is urgent to elucidate a biological marker based on objective imaging indicators to help distinguish the two. Therefore, this research aims to compare the functional connectivity between PBD-I patient and PBD-II patient in different brain networks.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our study enrolled 31 PBD-I and 23 PBD-II patients from 12 to 17 years of age. They were analyzed by resting state-functional connectivity through Independent component analysis (ICA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found differences between PBD-I and PBD-II in functional connectivity of the default network, frontoparietal network, salience network and limbic system. In addition, the clinical features, cognitive functions are associated with the functional connectivity of the intrinsic networks in PBD-I and PBD-II separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research is the first to find differences in functional connectivity between PBD-I and PBD-II, suggesting that abnormality of the functional connectivity within large networks may be biomarkers that help differentiate PBD-I from PBD-II in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 111802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abnormal functional connectivity of the intrinsic networks in adolescent bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder\",\"authors\":\"Qian Xiao ,&nbsp;Gui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The symptoms of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD)-I and PBD-II differ, but accurate identification at an early stage is difficult and may prevent effective treatment of this disorder. Therefore, it is urgent to elucidate a biological marker based on objective imaging indicators to help distinguish the two. Therefore, this research aims to compare the functional connectivity between PBD-I patient and PBD-II patient in different brain networks.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our study enrolled 31 PBD-I and 23 PBD-II patients from 12 to 17 years of age. They were analyzed by resting state-functional connectivity through Independent component analysis (ICA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found differences between PBD-I and PBD-II in functional connectivity of the default network, frontoparietal network, salience network and limbic system. In addition, the clinical features, cognitive functions are associated with the functional connectivity of the intrinsic networks in PBD-I and PBD-II separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research is the first to find differences in functional connectivity between PBD-I and PBD-II, suggesting that abnormality of the functional connectivity within large networks may be biomarkers that help differentiate PBD-I from PBD-II in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"340 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492724000258\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492724000258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景小儿双相情感障碍(PBD)-I 和 PBD-II 的症状各不相同,但很难在早期进行准确识别,这可能会妨碍对该疾病的有效治疗。因此,当务之急是根据客观影像学指标阐明一种生物标志物,以帮助区分这两种疾病。因此,本研究旨在比较 PBD-I 患者和 PBD-II 患者在不同大脑网络中的功能连接性。结果我们发现,PBD-Ⅰ和PBD-Ⅱ患者在默认网络、额顶叶网络、显著性网络和边缘系统的功能连接上存在差异。此外,PBD-Ⅰ和PBD-Ⅱ的临床特征、认知功能分别与固有网络的功能连通性相关。结论这项研究首次发现了PBD-Ⅰ和PBD-Ⅱ在功能连通性上的差异,表明大型网络内功能连通性的异常可能是未来帮助区分PBD-Ⅰ和PBD-Ⅱ的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abnormal functional connectivity of the intrinsic networks in adolescent bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder

Background

The symptoms of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD)-I and PBD-II differ, but accurate identification at an early stage is difficult and may prevent effective treatment of this disorder. Therefore, it is urgent to elucidate a biological marker based on objective imaging indicators to help distinguish the two. Therefore, this research aims to compare the functional connectivity between PBD-I patient and PBD-II patient in different brain networks.

Methods

Our study enrolled 31 PBD-I and 23 PBD-II patients from 12 to 17 years of age. They were analyzed by resting state-functional connectivity through Independent component analysis (ICA).

Results

We found differences between PBD-I and PBD-II in functional connectivity of the default network, frontoparietal network, salience network and limbic system. In addition, the clinical features, cognitive functions are associated with the functional connectivity of the intrinsic networks in PBD-I and PBD-II separately.

Conclusion

This research is the first to find differences in functional connectivity between PBD-I and PBD-II, suggesting that abnormality of the functional connectivity within large networks may be biomarkers that help differentiate PBD-I from PBD-II in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
期刊最新文献
Resting state functional connectivity in adolescents with substance use disorder and their unaffected siblings The association between eye movement characteristics and cognitive function in adolescents with major depressive disorder White matter organization abnormalities in adults with 47,XXX: A 7 Tesla MRI study Standardized weighted low-resolution electromagnetic tomography study of the amygdala activity in patients with comorbid major depressive disorder and anxiety symptoms Multimodal imaging of the amygdala in non-clinical subjects with high vs. low autistic-like social skills traits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1