评估大面积缺血核心以预测血栓切除术的结果:关于新治疗阶段的建议

T. Umemura, Yuko Tanaka, Toru Kurokawa, Ryo Miyaoka, M. Idei, Hirotsugu Ohta, J. Yamamoto
{"title":"评估大面积缺血核心以预测血栓切除术的结果:关于新治疗阶段的建议","authors":"T. Umemura, Yuko Tanaka, Toru Kurokawa, Ryo Miyaoka, M. Idei, Hirotsugu Ohta, J. Yamamoto","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Endovascular treatment of large ischemic cores is challenging. The severity of ischemic stress is assessed using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We aimed to evaluate the ADC in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score using diffusion‐weighted imaging and whether it correlates with clinical outcomes.\n \n \n \n This study included consecutive patients with acute large ischemic stroke (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score‐diffusion‐weighted imaging ≤5) who underwent endovascular treatment with successful recanalization between April 2014 and March 2023. The most frequent ADC (peak ADC) and diffusion‐weighted imaging lesion volumes were assessed. The primary outcome was the 3‐month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Good (mRS score, 0–3) and poor clinical outcomes (mRS score, 4–6) were compared to confirm whether ADC was associated with clinical outcomes.\n \n \n \n \n In total, 78 patients were enrolled in this study; 30 had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 3 months. The peak ADC in these patients was significantly higher than that in patients with mRS scores of 4 to 6 (\n P\n = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, peak ADC was strongly associated with good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.231;\n P\n = 0.0135) rather than onset‐to‐recanalization time and ischemic core volume. The optimal peak ADC threshold for discriminating between the mRS groups was 520×10\n −6\n mm\n 2\n /s with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. Good clinical outcomes were more frequently observed in patients with peak ADC ≥520×10\n −6\n mm\n 2\n /s (\n P\n <0.0001).\n \n \n \n \n \n In large ischemic cores, diffusion‐weighted imaging lesions with peak ADCs ≥520×10\n −6\n mm\n 2\n /s are associated with favorable outcomes. Evaluation of the ischemic core is necessary to confirm endovascular treatment.\n \n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"30 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Large Ischemic Cores to Predict Outcomes of Thrombectomy: A Proposal of a Novel Treatment Phase\",\"authors\":\"T. Umemura, Yuko Tanaka, Toru Kurokawa, Ryo Miyaoka, M. Idei, Hirotsugu Ohta, J. Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.123.001293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Endovascular treatment of large ischemic cores is challenging. The severity of ischemic stress is assessed using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We aimed to evaluate the ADC in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score using diffusion‐weighted imaging and whether it correlates with clinical outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study included consecutive patients with acute large ischemic stroke (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score‐diffusion‐weighted imaging ≤5) who underwent endovascular treatment with successful recanalization between April 2014 and March 2023. The most frequent ADC (peak ADC) and diffusion‐weighted imaging lesion volumes were assessed. The primary outcome was the 3‐month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Good (mRS score, 0–3) and poor clinical outcomes (mRS score, 4–6) were compared to confirm whether ADC was associated with clinical outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 78 patients were enrolled in this study; 30 had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 3 months. The peak ADC in these patients was significantly higher than that in patients with mRS scores of 4 to 6 (\\n P\\n = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, peak ADC was strongly associated with good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.231;\\n P\\n = 0.0135) rather than onset‐to‐recanalization time and ischemic core volume. The optimal peak ADC threshold for discriminating between the mRS groups was 520×10\\n −6\\n mm\\n 2\\n /s with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. Good clinical outcomes were more frequently observed in patients with peak ADC ≥520×10\\n −6\\n mm\\n 2\\n /s (\\n P\\n <0.0001).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n In large ischemic cores, diffusion‐weighted imaging lesions with peak ADCs ≥520×10\\n −6\\n mm\\n 2\\n /s are associated with favorable outcomes. Evaluation of the ischemic core is necessary to confirm endovascular treatment.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\"30 44\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大面积缺血核心的血管内治疗具有挑战性。缺血压力的严重程度可通过表观弥散系数(ADC)来评估。我们的目的是利用弥散加权成像评估阿尔伯塔省卒中计划早期 CT [计算机断层扫描] 评分较低患者的 ADC,以及它是否与临床结果相关。 本研究纳入了2014年4月至2023年3月期间接受血管内治疗并成功再通的急性大面积缺血性卒中(阿尔伯塔省卒中计划早期CT评分-弥散加权成像≤5)连续患者。对最常见的 ADC(峰值 ADC)和弥散加权成像病灶体积进行了评估。主要结果是3个月的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分。对良好(mRS 评分,0-3 分)和不良(mRS 评分,4-6 分)的临床结果进行比较,以确认 ADC 是否与临床结果相关。 共有 78 名患者参与了这项研究,其中 30 名患者在 3 个月时的 mRS 评分为 0 至 3 分。这些患者的 ADC 峰值明显高于 mRS 评分为 4 至 6 分的患者(P = 0.0002)。在多变量分析中,ADC峰值与良好的临床预后密切相关(几率比为1.231;P = 0.0135),而不是发病到重构时间和缺血核心体积。区分 mRS 组别的最佳 ADC 峰值阈值为 520×10 -6 mm 2 /s,灵敏度为 75%,特异度为 73%。ADC峰值≥520×10 -6 mm 2 /s的患者临床疗效更佳(P <0.0001)。 在大的缺血核心中,ADC峰值≥520×10 -6 mm 2 /s的弥散加权成像病灶与良好的预后相关。有必要对缺血核心进行评估,以确认血管内治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Large Ischemic Cores to Predict Outcomes of Thrombectomy: A Proposal of a Novel Treatment Phase
Endovascular treatment of large ischemic cores is challenging. The severity of ischemic stress is assessed using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We aimed to evaluate the ADC in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score using diffusion‐weighted imaging and whether it correlates with clinical outcomes. This study included consecutive patients with acute large ischemic stroke (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score‐diffusion‐weighted imaging ≤5) who underwent endovascular treatment with successful recanalization between April 2014 and March 2023. The most frequent ADC (peak ADC) and diffusion‐weighted imaging lesion volumes were assessed. The primary outcome was the 3‐month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Good (mRS score, 0–3) and poor clinical outcomes (mRS score, 4–6) were compared to confirm whether ADC was associated with clinical outcomes. In total, 78 patients were enrolled in this study; 30 had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 3 months. The peak ADC in these patients was significantly higher than that in patients with mRS scores of 4 to 6 ( P = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, peak ADC was strongly associated with good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.231; P = 0.0135) rather than onset‐to‐recanalization time and ischemic core volume. The optimal peak ADC threshold for discriminating between the mRS groups was 520×10 −6 mm 2 /s with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. Good clinical outcomes were more frequently observed in patients with peak ADC ≥520×10 −6 mm 2 /s ( P <0.0001). In large ischemic cores, diffusion‐weighted imaging lesions with peak ADCs ≥520×10 −6 mm 2 /s are associated with favorable outcomes. Evaluation of the ischemic core is necessary to confirm endovascular treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1