健康中年人的痴呆风险和丘脑核体积测量:预防痴呆研究

Sita N Shah, Maria-Eleni Dounavi, Paresh Malhotra, Brian Lawlor, L. Naci, Ivan Koychev, Craig Ritchie, Karen Ritchie, John T. O'Brien
{"title":"健康中年人的痴呆风险和丘脑核体积测量:预防痴呆研究","authors":"Sita N Shah, Maria-Eleni Dounavi, Paresh Malhotra, Brian Lawlor, L. Naci, Ivan Koychev, Craig Ritchie, Karen Ritchie, John T. O'Brien","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A reduction in the volume of the thalamus and its nuclei has been reported in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and asymptomatic individuals with risk factors for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Some studies have reported thalamic atrophy to occur prior to hippocampal atrophy, suggesting thalamic pathology may be an early sign of cognitive decline. We aimed to investigate volumetric differences in thalamic nuclei in middle-aged, cognitively unimpaired people with respect to dementia family history and apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriership and the relationship with cognition.\n 700 participants aged 40-59 years were recruited into the PREVENT-Dementia study. Individuals were stratified according to dementia risk (approximately half with and without parental dementia history). The subnuclei of the thalamus of 645 participants were segmented on T1-weighted 3 T MRI scans using Freesurfer 7.1.0. Thalamic nuclei were grouped into six regions; 1) Anterior, 2) Lateral, 3) Ventral, 4) Intralaminar, 5) Medial and 6) Posterior. Cognitive performance was evaluated using the computerised assessment of information processing battery.\n Robust linear regression was used to analyse differences in thalamic nuclei volumes and their association with cognitive performance, with age, sex, total intracranial volume and years of education as covariates and false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons.\n We did not find significant volumetric differences of the thalamus or its subregions, that survived FDR correction, with respect to first-degree family history of dementia or apolipoprotein ε4 allele status. Greater age was associated with smaller volumes of thalamic subregions, except for the medial thalamus, but only in those without dementia family history. A larger volume of the mediodorsal medial nucleus (pFDR = 0.019) was associated with a faster processing speed in those without dementia family history. Larger volumes of the thalamus (p = 0.016) and posterior thalamus (pFDR = 0.022) were associated with significantly worse performance in the immediate recall test in apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriers.\n We did not find significant volumetric differences of thalamic subregions in relation to dementia risk but did identify an interaction between dementia family history and age. Larger medial thalamic nuclei may exert a protective effect on cognitive performance in individuals without dementia family history but have little effect in those with dementia family history. Larger volumes of posterior thalamic nuclei were associated with worse recall in apolipoprotein ε4 carriers. Our results could represent initial dysregulation in the disease process; further study is needed with functional imaging and longitudinal analysis.","PeriodicalId":9318,"journal":{"name":"Brain Communications","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dementia risk and thalamic nuclei volumetry in healthy midlife adults: The prevent-dementia study\",\"authors\":\"Sita N Shah, Maria-Eleni Dounavi, Paresh Malhotra, Brian Lawlor, L. Naci, Ivan Koychev, Craig Ritchie, Karen Ritchie, John T. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/braincomms/fcae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A reduction in the volume of the thalamus and its nuclei has been reported in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and asymptomatic individuals with risk factors for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Some studies have reported thalamic atrophy to occur prior to hippocampal atrophy, suggesting thalamic pathology may be an early sign of cognitive decline. We aimed to investigate volumetric differences in thalamic nuclei in middle-aged, cognitively unimpaired people with respect to dementia family history and apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriership and the relationship with cognition.\\n 700 participants aged 40-59 years were recruited into the PREVENT-Dementia study. Individuals were stratified according to dementia risk (approximately half with and without parental dementia history). The subnuclei of the thalamus of 645 participants were segmented on T1-weighted 3 T MRI scans using Freesurfer 7.1.0. Thalamic nuclei were grouped into six regions; 1) Anterior, 2) Lateral, 3) Ventral, 4) Intralaminar, 5) Medial and 6) Posterior. Cognitive performance was evaluated using the computerised assessment of information processing battery.\\n Robust linear regression was used to analyse differences in thalamic nuclei volumes and their association with cognitive performance, with age, sex, total intracranial volume and years of education as covariates and false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons.\\n We did not find significant volumetric differences of the thalamus or its subregions, that survived FDR correction, with respect to first-degree family history of dementia or apolipoprotein ε4 allele status. Greater age was associated with smaller volumes of thalamic subregions, except for the medial thalamus, but only in those without dementia family history. A larger volume of the mediodorsal medial nucleus (pFDR = 0.019) was associated with a faster processing speed in those without dementia family history. Larger volumes of the thalamus (p = 0.016) and posterior thalamus (pFDR = 0.022) were associated with significantly worse performance in the immediate recall test in apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriers.\\n We did not find significant volumetric differences of thalamic subregions in relation to dementia risk but did identify an interaction between dementia family history and age. Larger medial thalamic nuclei may exert a protective effect on cognitive performance in individuals without dementia family history but have little effect in those with dementia family history. Larger volumes of posterior thalamic nuclei were associated with worse recall in apolipoprotein ε4 carriers. Our results could represent initial dysregulation in the disease process; further study is needed with functional imaging and longitudinal analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Communications\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,在阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知障碍和有早发性阿尔茨海默病危险因素的无症状个体中,丘脑及其核团的体积会缩小。一些研究报告称丘脑萎缩发生在海马萎缩之前,这表明丘脑病变可能是认知能力下降的早期征兆。我们的目的是研究认知功能未受损的中年人丘脑核的体积差异与痴呆家族史和脂蛋白ε4等位基因携带情况以及与认知功能的关系。PREVENT-痴呆症研究招募了 700 名 40-59 岁的参与者。研究人员根据痴呆症风险进行了分层(父母有痴呆症病史和父母无痴呆症病史的各占一半)。使用 Freesurfer 7.1.0 对 645 名参与者的丘脑亚核进行了 T1 加权 3 T MRI 扫描分割。丘脑核被分为六个区域:1)前部;2)外侧;3)腹侧;4)层内;5)内侧;6)后部。认知能力采用计算机化信息处理评估电池进行评估。以年龄、性别、颅内总容积和受教育年限作为协变量,并对多重比较进行错误发现率(FDR)校正,采用稳健线性回归分析丘脑核体积的差异及其与认知能力的关系。我们没有发现丘脑或其亚区在一级痴呆症家族史或载脂蛋白ε4等位基因状态方面存在明显的体积差异,也没有发现丘脑或其亚区在FDR校正后存在明显的体积差异。除丘脑内侧外,年龄越大丘脑亚区的体积越小,但仅限于无痴呆症家族史的人群。在无痴呆症家族史的人群中,背内侧内侧核体积越大(pFDR = 0.019),处理速度越快。在脂蛋白ε4等位基因携带者中,丘脑(p = 0.016)和丘脑后部(pFDR = 0.022)体积较大与即时回忆测试成绩明显较差有关。我们没有发现丘脑亚区的体积差异与痴呆风险有明显关系,但发现痴呆家族史和年龄之间存在相互作用。较大的丘脑内侧核可能对无痴呆症家族史的人的认知能力有保护作用,但对有痴呆症家族史的人影响不大。丘脑后核体积较大与载脂蛋白ε4携带者的回忆能力较差有关。我们的研究结果可能代表了疾病过程中的初始失调;还需要通过功能成像和纵向分析进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dementia risk and thalamic nuclei volumetry in healthy midlife adults: The prevent-dementia study
A reduction in the volume of the thalamus and its nuclei has been reported in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and asymptomatic individuals with risk factors for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Some studies have reported thalamic atrophy to occur prior to hippocampal atrophy, suggesting thalamic pathology may be an early sign of cognitive decline. We aimed to investigate volumetric differences in thalamic nuclei in middle-aged, cognitively unimpaired people with respect to dementia family history and apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriership and the relationship with cognition. 700 participants aged 40-59 years were recruited into the PREVENT-Dementia study. Individuals were stratified according to dementia risk (approximately half with and without parental dementia history). The subnuclei of the thalamus of 645 participants were segmented on T1-weighted 3 T MRI scans using Freesurfer 7.1.0. Thalamic nuclei were grouped into six regions; 1) Anterior, 2) Lateral, 3) Ventral, 4) Intralaminar, 5) Medial and 6) Posterior. Cognitive performance was evaluated using the computerised assessment of information processing battery. Robust linear regression was used to analyse differences in thalamic nuclei volumes and their association with cognitive performance, with age, sex, total intracranial volume and years of education as covariates and false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons. We did not find significant volumetric differences of the thalamus or its subregions, that survived FDR correction, with respect to first-degree family history of dementia or apolipoprotein ε4 allele status. Greater age was associated with smaller volumes of thalamic subregions, except for the medial thalamus, but only in those without dementia family history. A larger volume of the mediodorsal medial nucleus (pFDR = 0.019) was associated with a faster processing speed in those without dementia family history. Larger volumes of the thalamus (p = 0.016) and posterior thalamus (pFDR = 0.022) were associated with significantly worse performance in the immediate recall test in apolipoprotein ε4 allele carriers. We did not find significant volumetric differences of thalamic subregions in relation to dementia risk but did identify an interaction between dementia family history and age. Larger medial thalamic nuclei may exert a protective effect on cognitive performance in individuals without dementia family history but have little effect in those with dementia family history. Larger volumes of posterior thalamic nuclei were associated with worse recall in apolipoprotein ε4 carriers. Our results could represent initial dysregulation in the disease process; further study is needed with functional imaging and longitudinal analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dose-dependent LSD effects on cortical/thalamic and cerebellar activity: brain oxygen level-dependent fMRI study in awake rats Statin use and risk of Parkinson’s disease among older adults in Japan: a nested case-control study using the longevity improvement and fair evidence study Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy Leveraging sex-genetic interactions to understand brain disorders: recent advances and current gaps Propionic acid promotes neurite recovery in damaged multiple sclerosis neurons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1