氨甲环酸减少颈椎手术患者围手术期失血量效果的回顾性对比分析

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001592
Adam J Money, Guillaume Dumont, Sean Sheppard, J Benjamin Jackson, Michael Spitnale, Yianni Bakaes, Chase Gauthier, Gregory Grabowski
{"title":"氨甲环酸减少颈椎手术患者围手术期失血量效果的回顾性对比分析","authors":"Adam J Money, Guillaume Dumont, Sean Sheppard, J Benjamin Jackson, Michael Spitnale, Yianni Bakaes, Chase Gauthier, Gregory Grabowski","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of intravenous TXA on blood loss outcomes in anterior, posterior, and combined approaches for elective cervical spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss in a variety of operations, such as lumbar spine surgery. However, limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of TXA in cervical spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's elective cervical spine operations between September 2011 and March 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: anterior approach, posterior approach, or combined approach. Patients were then further subdivided into TXA versus control groups based on whether they received TXA treatment. We performed multiple linear regressions to assess the relationship between the use of TXA and other dependent variables (number of vertebral levels treated, need for a vertebral corpectomy) on total perioperative blood loss, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drain output, total operative time, postoperative change in hemoglobin, and occurrence of transfusion and/or postoperative deep venous thrombus (DVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the use of TXA statistically significantly reduced total perioperative blood loss ( P =0.04) and postoperative drain output ( P =0.004) in posterior surgical approach cervical spine surgery but did not statistically significantly impact any blood loss variables in anterior or combined surgical approaches to elective cervical spine surgery. The use of TXA was a significant predictor for a decrease in intraoperative ( P =0.02) and postoperative ( P <0.01) blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that TXA statistically significantly decreased total blood loss and postoperative drain output when controlling for multiple confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E330-E334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Comparative Analysis on the Effect of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Perioperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Adam J Money, Guillaume Dumont, Sean Sheppard, J Benjamin Jackson, Michael Spitnale, Yianni Bakaes, Chase Gauthier, Gregory Grabowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of intravenous TXA on blood loss outcomes in anterior, posterior, and combined approaches for elective cervical spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss in a variety of operations, such as lumbar spine surgery. However, limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of TXA in cervical spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's elective cervical spine operations between September 2011 and March 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: anterior approach, posterior approach, or combined approach. Patients were then further subdivided into TXA versus control groups based on whether they received TXA treatment. We performed multiple linear regressions to assess the relationship between the use of TXA and other dependent variables (number of vertebral levels treated, need for a vertebral corpectomy) on total perioperative blood loss, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drain output, total operative time, postoperative change in hemoglobin, and occurrence of transfusion and/or postoperative deep venous thrombus (DVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the use of TXA statistically significantly reduced total perioperative blood loss ( P =0.04) and postoperative drain output ( P =0.004) in posterior surgical approach cervical spine surgery but did not statistically significantly impact any blood loss variables in anterior or combined surgical approaches to elective cervical spine surgery. The use of TXA was a significant predictor for a decrease in intraoperative ( P =0.02) and postoperative ( P <0.01) blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that TXA statistically significantly decreased total blood loss and postoperative drain output when controlling for multiple confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E330-E334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究:本研究的目的是评估静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)对选择性颈椎手术前路、后路和联合入路失血结果的影响:氨甲环酸(TXA)已被证明可减少腰椎手术等多种手术的失血量。然而,评估氨甲环酸在颈椎手术中疗效的研究却很有限:我们对一名外科医生在 2011 年 9 月至 2017 年 3 月期间的择期颈椎手术进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为三组:前路、后路或联合路。然后根据是否接受 TXA 治疗将患者进一步细分为 TXA 组和对照组。我们进行了多元线性回归,以评估TXA的使用和其他因变量(治疗的椎体水平数、椎体切除术的需要)与围术期总失血量、术中估计失血量、术后引流量、总手术时间、术后血红蛋白变化以及输血和/或术后深静脉血栓(DVT)发生率之间的关系:我们发现,在后路手术入路的颈椎手术中,使用TXA可显著减少围术期总失血量(P=0.04)和术后引流管输出量(P=0.004),但在前路或联合手术入路的择期颈椎手术中,使用TXA对任何失血变量均无显著影响。使用 TXA 可显著预测术中(P=0.02)和术后(PConclusions)失血量的减少:本研究发现,在控制多种混杂因素的情况下,TXA可在统计学上显著降低总失血量和术后引流管输出量:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Retrospective Comparative Analysis on the Effect of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Perioperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of intravenous TXA on blood loss outcomes in anterior, posterior, and combined approaches for elective cervical spine surgery.

Summary of background data: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss in a variety of operations, such as lumbar spine surgery. However, limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of TXA in cervical spine surgery.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's elective cervical spine operations between September 2011 and March 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: anterior approach, posterior approach, or combined approach. Patients were then further subdivided into TXA versus control groups based on whether they received TXA treatment. We performed multiple linear regressions to assess the relationship between the use of TXA and other dependent variables (number of vertebral levels treated, need for a vertebral corpectomy) on total perioperative blood loss, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drain output, total operative time, postoperative change in hemoglobin, and occurrence of transfusion and/or postoperative deep venous thrombus (DVT).

Results: We found that the use of TXA statistically significantly reduced total perioperative blood loss ( P =0.04) and postoperative drain output ( P =0.004) in posterior surgical approach cervical spine surgery but did not statistically significantly impact any blood loss variables in anterior or combined surgical approaches to elective cervical spine surgery. The use of TXA was a significant predictor for a decrease in intraoperative ( P =0.02) and postoperative ( P <0.01) blood loss.

Conclusions: This study found that TXA statistically significantly decreased total blood loss and postoperative drain output when controlling for multiple confounding factors.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT as a Source of Patient Information for Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search. Restoration of Spinopelvic Alignment After Reduction of High-grade Spondylolisthesis: Myth or Reality? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis. Timelines for Return to Different Sports Types After Eight Cervical Spine Fractures in Recreational and Elite Athletes: A Survey of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research. Feasibility of Using Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Detecting Bone Layer of Cervical Spine Surgery. Lower Hounsfield Units at the Planned Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1