帽状张力环和帽状钩植入术治疗马凡氏综合征眼睑外翻的安全性和有效性:真实世界研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001434
Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Tianhui Chen, Xin Shen, Yalei Wang, Yang Sun, Yongxiang Jiang
{"title":"帽状张力环和帽状钩植入术治疗马凡氏综合征眼睑外翻的安全性和有效性:真实世界研究。","authors":"Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Tianhui Chen, Xin Shen, Yalei Wang, Yang Sun, Yongxiang Jiang","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capsular tension ring and capsular hook (CTR-CH) implantation in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with ectopia lentis (EL).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with MFS who had in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation assisted by CTR-CH or modified CTR (MCTR). The safety analysis focused on the resurgery rate. The efficacy analysis compared the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the incidence of laser capsulotomy after propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study encompassed 148 eyes that had the CTR-CH procedure and 162 eyes that received MCTR implantation. In the CTR-CH group, the median age at the time of surgery was 5 years, with a mean follow-up duration of 1.81 ± 0.4 years. 5 eyes (3.38%) required a second surgery because of retinal detachment (2, 1.35%), IOL decentration (2, 1.35%), and CH dislocation (1, 0.68%). The resurgery rate was comparable with that of the MCTR group ( P = .486). After PSM, a total of 108 eyes were recruited in each group. Postoperative CDVA was significantly improved in both groups (both P < .001), but comparable between the groups ( P = .057). The posterior capsular opacification took place earlier ( P = .046) while the anterior capsular opacification required laser capsulotomy at a later stage ( P = .037) compared with the MCTR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTR-CH procedure was a feasible, safe, and efficient approach for managing EL in patients with MFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"698-706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of capsular tension ring and capsular hook implantation for managing ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome: real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Tianhui Chen, Xin Shen, Yalei Wang, Yang Sun, Yongxiang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capsular tension ring and capsular hook (CTR-CH) implantation in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with ectopia lentis (EL).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with MFS who had in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation assisted by CTR-CH or modified CTR (MCTR). The safety analysis focused on the resurgery rate. The efficacy analysis compared the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the incidence of laser capsulotomy after propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study encompassed 148 eyes that had the CTR-CH procedure and 162 eyes that received MCTR implantation. In the CTR-CH group, the median age at the time of surgery was 5 years, with a mean follow-up duration of 1.81 ± 0.4 years. 5 eyes (3.38%) required a second surgery because of retinal detachment (2, 1.35%), IOL decentration (2, 1.35%), and CH dislocation (1, 0.68%). The resurgery rate was comparable with that of the MCTR group ( P = .486). After PSM, a total of 108 eyes were recruited in each group. Postoperative CDVA was significantly improved in both groups (both P < .001), but comparable between the groups ( P = .057). The posterior capsular opacification took place earlier ( P = .046) while the anterior capsular opacification required laser capsulotomy at a later stage ( P = .037) compared with the MCTR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTR-CH procedure was a feasible, safe, and efficient approach for managing EL in patients with MFS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"698-706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估马凡氏综合征(MFS)患者眼睑外翻(EL)时植入囊张力环和囊钩(CTR-CH)的安全性和有效性:复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院:回顾性倾向分数匹配队列研究:本研究纳入了在CTR-CH或改良囊膜拉力环(MCTR)辅助下进行囊内人工晶体(IOL)植入术的MFS患者。安全性分析的重点是再次手术率。疗效分析比较了最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和倾向得分匹配(PSM)后激光切囊的发生率:该研究包括148只接受CTR-CH手术的眼睛和162只接受MCTR植入手术的眼睛。在 CTR-CH 组中,手术时的中位年龄为 5 岁,平均随访时间为 1.81 ± 0.4 年。5只眼睛(3.38%)因视网膜脱离(2只,1.35%)、人工晶体脱位(2只,1.35%)和CH脱位(1只,0.68%)而需要进行第二次手术。再次手术率与 MCTR 组相当(P = 0.486)。PSM 后,每组共招募了 108 名患者。两组患者术后 BCVA 均有明显改善(均 P < 0.001),但两组之间的差异不明显(P = 0.057)。与MCTR组相比,后囊膜混浊发生的时间更早(P = 0.046),而前囊膜混浊需要激光切囊的时间更晚(P = 0.037):结论:CTR-CH手术是治疗MFS患者EL的一种可行、安全且高效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of capsular tension ring and capsular hook implantation for managing ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome: real-world study.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capsular tension ring and capsular hook (CTR-CH) implantation in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with ectopia lentis (EL).

Setting: Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Design: Retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Methods: This study included patients with MFS who had in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation assisted by CTR-CH or modified CTR (MCTR). The safety analysis focused on the resurgery rate. The efficacy analysis compared the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the incidence of laser capsulotomy after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: This study encompassed 148 eyes that had the CTR-CH procedure and 162 eyes that received MCTR implantation. In the CTR-CH group, the median age at the time of surgery was 5 years, with a mean follow-up duration of 1.81 ± 0.4 years. 5 eyes (3.38%) required a second surgery because of retinal detachment (2, 1.35%), IOL decentration (2, 1.35%), and CH dislocation (1, 0.68%). The resurgery rate was comparable with that of the MCTR group ( P = .486). After PSM, a total of 108 eyes were recruited in each group. Postoperative CDVA was significantly improved in both groups (both P < .001), but comparable between the groups ( P = .057). The posterior capsular opacification took place earlier ( P = .046) while the anterior capsular opacification required laser capsulotomy at a later stage ( P = .037) compared with the MCTR group.

Conclusions: The CTR-CH procedure was a feasible, safe, and efficient approach for managing EL in patients with MFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Ocular Shape of Cataract with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Case-Control Study. Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability after Cataract Surgery with and without Primary Posterior Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorrhexis. Risk of Zonular Dialysis in Fellow-Eye Cataract Surgeries: A Multicenter Comparative Study. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in patients with endothelial dystrophy without edema. Analysis of the ESCRS calculator's prediction accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1