使用 2bRAD-M 元基因组测序法分析不同清洁度的可摘义齿上的病原微生物群。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Oral Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059
Tong Wah Lim, Shi Huang, Yuesong Jiang, Yufeng Zhang, Michael Francis Burrow, Colman McGrath
{"title":"使用 2bRAD-M 元基因组测序法分析不同清洁度的可摘义齿上的病原微生物群。","authors":"Tong Wah Lim, Shi Huang, Yuesong Jiang, Yufeng Zhang, Michael Francis Burrow, Colman McGrath","doi":"10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The microbiomes on the surface of unclean removable prostheses are complex and yet largely underexplored using metagenomic sequencing technology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the microbiome of removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using Type IIB Restriction-site Associated DNA for Microbiome (2bRAD-M) sequencing and compare the Microbial Index of Pathogenic Bacteria (MIP) between clean and unclean prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-seven removable prostheses were classified into 'clean' and 'unclean' groups. All prosthesis plaque samples underwent 2bRAD metagenomic sequencing to characterize the species-resolved microbial composition. MIPs for clean and unclean prostheses were calculated based on the sum of the relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria in a microbiome using a reference database that contains opportunistic pathogenic bacteria and disease-associated information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beta diversity analyses based on Jaccard qualitative and Bray-Curtis quantitative distance matrices identified significant differences between the two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant enrichment of many pathogenic bacteria in the unclean prosthesis group. The MIP for unclean prostheses (0.47 ± 0.25) was significantly higher than for clean prostheses (0.37 ± 0.29), <i>p</i> = 0.029.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The microbial community of plaque samples from 'unclean' prostheses demonstrated compositional differences compared with 'clean' prostheses. In addition, the pathogenic microbiome in the 'unclean' versus 'clean' group differed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Microbiology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2317059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of pathogenic microbiome on removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using 2bRAD-M metagenomic sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Wah Lim, Shi Huang, Yuesong Jiang, Yufeng Zhang, Michael Francis Burrow, Colman McGrath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The microbiomes on the surface of unclean removable prostheses are complex and yet largely underexplored using metagenomic sequencing technology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the microbiome of removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using Type IIB Restriction-site Associated DNA for Microbiome (2bRAD-M) sequencing and compare the Microbial Index of Pathogenic Bacteria (MIP) between clean and unclean prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-seven removable prostheses were classified into 'clean' and 'unclean' groups. All prosthesis plaque samples underwent 2bRAD metagenomic sequencing to characterize the species-resolved microbial composition. MIPs for clean and unclean prostheses were calculated based on the sum of the relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria in a microbiome using a reference database that contains opportunistic pathogenic bacteria and disease-associated information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beta diversity analyses based on Jaccard qualitative and Bray-Curtis quantitative distance matrices identified significant differences between the two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant enrichment of many pathogenic bacteria in the unclean prosthesis group. The MIP for unclean prostheses (0.47 ± 0.25) was significantly higher than for clean prostheses (0.37 ± 0.29), <i>p</i> = 0.029.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The microbial community of plaque samples from 'unclean' prostheses demonstrated compositional differences compared with 'clean' prostheses. In addition, the pathogenic microbiome in the 'unclean' versus 'clean' group differed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2317059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不洁可摘义齿表面的微生物群非常复杂,但元基因组测序技术对其的研究却远远不够:使用 IIB 型限制性位点相关 DNA 微生物组(2bRAD-M)测序技术描述不同清洁度的可摘义齿的微生物组特征,并比较清洁和不清洁义齿的致病菌微生物指数(MIP):将 97 个可摘义齿分为 "清洁 "组和 "不清洁 "组。所有假体斑块样本都进行了 2bRAD 元基因组测序,以确定微生物组成的物种特征。利用包含机会致病菌和疾病相关信息的参考数据库,根据微生物组中致病菌相对丰度的总和计算出清洁和不清洁假体的 MIPs:基于Jaccard定性和Bray-Curtis定量距离矩阵的贝塔多样性分析确定了两组之间的显著差异(p p = 0.029):结论:与 "清洁 "假体相比,"不清洁 "假体牙菌斑样本的微生物群落在组成上存在差异。此外,"不清洁 "组与 "清洁 "组的病原微生物群也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of pathogenic microbiome on removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using 2bRAD-M metagenomic sequencing.

Background: The microbiomes on the surface of unclean removable prostheses are complex and yet largely underexplored using metagenomic sequencing technology.

Objectives: To characterize the microbiome of removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using Type IIB Restriction-site Associated DNA for Microbiome (2bRAD-M) sequencing and compare the Microbial Index of Pathogenic Bacteria (MIP) between clean and unclean prostheses.

Materials and methods: Ninety-seven removable prostheses were classified into 'clean' and 'unclean' groups. All prosthesis plaque samples underwent 2bRAD metagenomic sequencing to characterize the species-resolved microbial composition. MIPs for clean and unclean prostheses were calculated based on the sum of the relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria in a microbiome using a reference database that contains opportunistic pathogenic bacteria and disease-associated information.

Results: Beta diversity analyses based on Jaccard qualitative and Bray-Curtis quantitative distance matrices identified significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant enrichment of many pathogenic bacteria in the unclean prosthesis group. The MIP for unclean prostheses (0.47 ± 0.25) was significantly higher than for clean prostheses (0.37 ± 0.29), p = 0.029.

Conclusions: The microbial community of plaque samples from 'unclean' prostheses demonstrated compositional differences compared with 'clean' prostheses. In addition, the pathogenic microbiome in the 'unclean' versus 'clean' group differed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the first Open Access journal in its field, the Journal of Oral Microbiology aims to be an influential source of knowledge on the aetiological agents behind oral infectious diseases. The journal is an international forum for original research on all aspects of ''oral health''. Articles which seek to understand ''oral health'' through exploration of the pathogenesis, virulence, host-parasite interactions, and immunology of oral infections are of particular interest. However, the journal also welcomes work that addresses the global agenda of oral infectious diseases and articles that present new strategies for treatment and prevention or improvements to existing strategies. Topics: ''oral health'', microbiome, genomics, host-pathogen interactions, oral infections, aetiologic agents, pathogenesis, molecular microbiology systemic diseases, ecology/environmental microbiology, treatment, diagnostics, epidemiology, basic oral microbiology, and taxonomy/systematics. Article types: original articles, notes, review articles, mini-reviews and commentaries
期刊最新文献
Oral administration of Porphyromonas gingivalis to mice with diet-induced obesity impairs cognitive function associated with microglial activation in the brain. RE: colonization of bacterial and viral respiratory pathogens among healthcare workers in China during COVID-19 pandemic. In vitro plaque formation model to unravel biofilm formation dynamics on implant abutment surfaces. Evaluation of a Burkholderia ambifaria strain from plants as a novel promising probiotic in dental caries management. Methanobrevibacter oralis: a comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1