肺泡一氧化氮在胃食管反流引起的咳嗽中的作用:前瞻性观察研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17534666241231117
Li Zhang, Mengru Zhang, Alimire Aierken, Ran Dong, Qiang Chen, Zhongmin Qiu
{"title":"肺泡一氧化氮在胃食管反流引起的咳嗽中的作用:前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Li Zhang, Mengru Zhang, Alimire Aierken, Ran Dong, Qiang Chen, Zhongmin Qiu","doi":"10.1177/17534666241231117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measured at multiple exhalation flow rates can be used as a biomarker to differentiate central and peripheral airway inflammation. However, the role of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) indicating peripheral airway inflammation remains unclear in gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough (GERC).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to characterize the changes in alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) and determine its clinical implication in GERC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a single-center prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FeNOs at exhalation flow rates of 50 and 200 ml/s were measured in 102 patients with GERC and 134 patients with other causes of chronic cough (non-GERC). CaNO was calculated based on a two-compartment model and the factors associated with CaNO were analyzed. The effect of anti-reflux therapy on CaNO was examined in 26 GERC patients with elevated CaNO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CaNO was significantly elevated in GERC compared with that in non-GERC (4.6 ± 4.4 ppb <i>versus</i> 2.8 ± 2.3 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001). GERC patients with high CaNO (>5 ppb) had more proximal reflux events (24 ± 15 <i>versus</i> 9 ± 9 episodes, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher level of pepsin (984.8 ± 492.5 <i>versus</i> 634.5 ± 626.4 pg/ml, <i>p</i> = 0.002) in sputum supernatant than those with normal CaNO. More GERC patients with high CaNO required intensified anti-reflux therapy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.963, <i>p</i> = 0.046), as predicted by a sensitivity of 41.7% and specificity of 83.3%. Cough relief paralleled a significant improvement in CaNO (8.3 ± 3.0 <i>versus</i> 4.8 ± 2.6 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peripheral airway inflammation can be assessed by CaNO measurement in GERC. High CaNO indicates potential micro-aspiration and may predict a necessity for intensified anti-reflux therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"17534666241231117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of alveolar nitric oxide in gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough: prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhang, Mengru Zhang, Alimire Aierken, Ran Dong, Qiang Chen, Zhongmin Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17534666241231117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measured at multiple exhalation flow rates can be used as a biomarker to differentiate central and peripheral airway inflammation. However, the role of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) indicating peripheral airway inflammation remains unclear in gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough (GERC).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to characterize the changes in alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) and determine its clinical implication in GERC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a single-center prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FeNOs at exhalation flow rates of 50 and 200 ml/s were measured in 102 patients with GERC and 134 patients with other causes of chronic cough (non-GERC). CaNO was calculated based on a two-compartment model and the factors associated with CaNO were analyzed. The effect of anti-reflux therapy on CaNO was examined in 26 GERC patients with elevated CaNO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CaNO was significantly elevated in GERC compared with that in non-GERC (4.6 ± 4.4 ppb <i>versus</i> 2.8 ± 2.3 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001). GERC patients with high CaNO (>5 ppb) had more proximal reflux events (24 ± 15 <i>versus</i> 9 ± 9 episodes, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher level of pepsin (984.8 ± 492.5 <i>versus</i> 634.5 ± 626.4 pg/ml, <i>p</i> = 0.002) in sputum supernatant than those with normal CaNO. More GERC patients with high CaNO required intensified anti-reflux therapy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.963, <i>p</i> = 0.046), as predicted by a sensitivity of 41.7% and specificity of 83.3%. Cough relief paralleled a significant improvement in CaNO (8.3 ± 3.0 <i>versus</i> 4.8 ± 2.6 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peripheral airway inflammation can be assessed by CaNO measurement in GERC. High CaNO indicates potential micro-aspiration and may predict a necessity for intensified anti-reflux therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17534666241231117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241231117\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241231117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在多种呼气流速下测量的分量呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)可用作区分中枢和外周气道炎症的生物标志物。然而,肺泡一氧化氮(CaNO)在胃食管反流相关性咳嗽(GERC)中指示外周气道炎症的作用仍不明确:我们旨在描述肺泡一氧化氮(CaNO)的变化特征,并确定其在胃食管反流性咳嗽中的临床意义:这是一项单中心前瞻性观察研究:方法:测量 102 名 GERC 患者和 134 名其他原因引起的慢性咳嗽(非 GERC)患者在 50 毫升/秒和 200 毫升/秒呼气流速下的 FeNO。根据二室模型计算出 CaNO,并分析了与 CaNO 相关的因素。在 26 名 CaNO 升高的 GERC 患者中,研究了抗反流治疗对 CaNO 的影响:结果:与 CaNO 正常的患者相比,GERC 患者的 CaNO 明显升高(4.6 ± 4.4 ppb 对 2.8 ± 2.3 ppb,p 5 ppb),有更多的近端反流事件(24 ± 15 对 9 ± 9 次,p = 0.001),痰上清液中胃蛋白酶水平更高(984.8 ± 492.5 对 634.5 ± 626.4 pg/ml,p = 0.002)。更多的高 CaNO GERC 患者需要加强抗反流治疗(χ2 = 3.963,p = 0.046),预计敏感性为 41.7%,特异性为 83.3%。在咳嗽缓解的同时,CNO 也有明显改善(8.3 ± 3.0 对 4.8 ± 2.6 ppb,P 结论:CNO 的改善与咳嗽的缓解密切相关:在 GERC 中通过 CaNO 测量可评估外周气道炎症。高 CaNO 表示潜在的微吸入,可能预示着需要加强抗反流治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of alveolar nitric oxide in gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough: prospective observational study.

Background: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measured at multiple exhalation flow rates can be used as a biomarker to differentiate central and peripheral airway inflammation. However, the role of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) indicating peripheral airway inflammation remains unclear in gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough (GERC).

Objectives: We aimed to characterize the changes in alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) and determine its clinical implication in GERC.

Design: This is a single-center prospective observational study.

Methods: FeNOs at exhalation flow rates of 50 and 200 ml/s were measured in 102 patients with GERC and 134 patients with other causes of chronic cough (non-GERC). CaNO was calculated based on a two-compartment model and the factors associated with CaNO were analyzed. The effect of anti-reflux therapy on CaNO was examined in 26 GERC patients with elevated CaNO.

Results: CaNO was significantly elevated in GERC compared with that in non-GERC (4.6 ± 4.4 ppb versus 2.8 ± 2.3 ppb, p < 0.001). GERC patients with high CaNO (>5 ppb) had more proximal reflux events (24 ± 15 versus 9 ± 9 episodes, p = 0.001) and a higher level of pepsin (984.8 ± 492.5 versus 634.5 ± 626.4 pg/ml, p = 0.002) in sputum supernatant than those with normal CaNO. More GERC patients with high CaNO required intensified anti-reflux therapy (χ2 = 3.963, p = 0.046), as predicted by a sensitivity of 41.7% and specificity of 83.3%. Cough relief paralleled a significant improvement in CaNO (8.3 ± 3.0 versus 4.8 ± 2.6 ppb, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Peripheral airway inflammation can be assessed by CaNO measurement in GERC. High CaNO indicates potential micro-aspiration and may predict a necessity for intensified anti-reflux therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
期刊最新文献
Prone positioning during CPAP therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a concise clinical review. Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data. Referral rates and barriers to lung transplantation based on pulmonary function criteria in interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective cohort study. A comparison between a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire-based algorithm and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index: a new parameter for the identification of non-acid gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1