Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson
{"title":"验证用于评估护理专业学生电子健康记录模拟能力的工具。","authors":"Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：本研究旨在确定电子健康记录模拟能力评估（CASE）工具的可靠性和有效性：背景：有效的教学实践，包括对学生电子健康记录（EHR）能力进行有效、可靠的评估，有助于提供安全、优质、高效的护理服务：该研究采用混合方法设计来测试 CASE 工具的可靠性和有效性：来自 27 个州的大学教师为使用 CASE 工具的视频提供了具有全国代表性的样本分数。47 名参与者中的 22 人（47%）完成了第二轮评分。第一次和第二次回答的最终得分之间的类内相关性显示了测试-再测试可靠性的一致性（ICC = .78, p < .001）：CASE 工具为评估模拟电子病历能力提供了有效性和可靠性的证据。
Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.
Aim: The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.
Background: Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.
Method: The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.
Results: A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).
Conclusion: The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
