在线 SBIRT 培训项目评估。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Pub Date : 2024-03-03 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1080/00952990.2023.2286582
Joseph G Pickard, Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Sharon D Johnson, Miriam Taylor
{"title":"在线 SBIRT 培训项目评估。","authors":"Joseph G Pickard, Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Sharon D Johnson, Miriam Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2023.2286582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> While human ecosystem disruptions have happened in the past, the COVID-19 pandemic is the first situation to warrant such a large, world-wide transition to online education. The pandemic has increased the need for intervention with people in varying stages of substance use disorders.<i>Objectives:</i> In response to the need for more evidence-based, online educational and training options to address this need, this study used pre-posttest evaluations to determine the efficacy of an online training for a specific evidence-based intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Services (SBIRT).<i>Methods:</i> Social Work students from two universities completed a 4-hour, online training in SBIRT which included a pre/posttest, demographic variables, a satisfaction scale, and a measure of self-efficacy. Mixed Effects Linear regression was used to model the repeated measures of SBIRT knowledge and efficacy, while a linear regression model was used to measure the relationship between satisfaction and participant characteristics.<i>Results:</i> Participants were mostly female (85.9%), mostly White/Caucasian (72.9%), and most already had a bachelor's degree (50%) or higher (9.6%). Individuals who were White, non-Hispanic/Latinx, or had master's level or doctoral level mental health training were more likely to have higher SBIRT scores. Those with the highest levels of self-efficacy had the lowest change scores on the knowledge test. Overall, there was an almost threefold increase in SBIRT knowledge posttraining, indicating the viability of this training format, which is similar to findings from studies of in-person trainings of SBIRT which also found increases in SBIRT knowledge.<i>Conclusion:</i> Recommendations based on the results are provided to encourage improved student outcomes from this type of e-learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an online SBIRT training program.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph G Pickard, Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Sharon D Johnson, Miriam Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00952990.2023.2286582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> While human ecosystem disruptions have happened in the past, the COVID-19 pandemic is the first situation to warrant such a large, world-wide transition to online education. The pandemic has increased the need for intervention with people in varying stages of substance use disorders.<i>Objectives:</i> In response to the need for more evidence-based, online educational and training options to address this need, this study used pre-posttest evaluations to determine the efficacy of an online training for a specific evidence-based intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Services (SBIRT).<i>Methods:</i> Social Work students from two universities completed a 4-hour, online training in SBIRT which included a pre/posttest, demographic variables, a satisfaction scale, and a measure of self-efficacy. Mixed Effects Linear regression was used to model the repeated measures of SBIRT knowledge and efficacy, while a linear regression model was used to measure the relationship between satisfaction and participant characteristics.<i>Results:</i> Participants were mostly female (85.9%), mostly White/Caucasian (72.9%), and most already had a bachelor's degree (50%) or higher (9.6%). Individuals who were White, non-Hispanic/Latinx, or had master's level or doctoral level mental health training were more likely to have higher SBIRT scores. Those with the highest levels of self-efficacy had the lowest change scores on the knowledge test. Overall, there was an almost threefold increase in SBIRT knowledge posttraining, indicating the viability of this training format, which is similar to findings from studies of in-person trainings of SBIRT which also found increases in SBIRT knowledge.<i>Conclusion:</i> Recommendations based on the results are provided to encourage improved student outcomes from this type of e-learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2286582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2286582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然人类生态系统的破坏在过去也曾发生过,但 COVID-19 大流行是第一次需要在全球范围内如此大规模地过渡到在线教育的情况。这种流行病增加了对处于不同药物使用障碍阶段的人进行干预的需求:为了满足对更多循证在线教育和培训选项的需求,本研究采用了前测-后测评估的方法,以确定针对特定循证干预--筛查、简单干预和转介服务(SBIRT)--的在线培训的效果:来自两所大学的社会工作专业学生完成了 4 小时的 SBIRT 在线培训,培训内容包括前/后测试、人口统计学变量、满意度量表和自我效能测量。混合效应线性回归用于建立 SBIRT 知识和效能的重复测量模型,而线性回归模型则用于测量满意度与参与者特征之间的关系:参与者大部分为女性(85.9%),大部分为白人/高加索人(72.9%),大部分已获得学士学位(50%)或更高学位(9.6%)。白人、非西班牙裔/拉丁裔、受过硕士或博士心理健康培训的人更有可能获得较高的 SBIRT 分数。自我效能感最高的人在知识测试中的得分变化最小。总体而言,培训后 SBIRT 知识增加了近三倍,表明这种培训形式是可行的,这与 SBIRT 面对面培训的研究结果类似,后者也发现 SBIRT 知识有所增加:结论:根据研究结果提出建议,鼓励通过这种电子学习方式提高学生的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of an online SBIRT training program.

Background: While human ecosystem disruptions have happened in the past, the COVID-19 pandemic is the first situation to warrant such a large, world-wide transition to online education. The pandemic has increased the need for intervention with people in varying stages of substance use disorders.Objectives: In response to the need for more evidence-based, online educational and training options to address this need, this study used pre-posttest evaluations to determine the efficacy of an online training for a specific evidence-based intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Services (SBIRT).Methods: Social Work students from two universities completed a 4-hour, online training in SBIRT which included a pre/posttest, demographic variables, a satisfaction scale, and a measure of self-efficacy. Mixed Effects Linear regression was used to model the repeated measures of SBIRT knowledge and efficacy, while a linear regression model was used to measure the relationship between satisfaction and participant characteristics.Results: Participants were mostly female (85.9%), mostly White/Caucasian (72.9%), and most already had a bachelor's degree (50%) or higher (9.6%). Individuals who were White, non-Hispanic/Latinx, or had master's level or doctoral level mental health training were more likely to have higher SBIRT scores. Those with the highest levels of self-efficacy had the lowest change scores on the knowledge test. Overall, there was an almost threefold increase in SBIRT knowledge posttraining, indicating the viability of this training format, which is similar to findings from studies of in-person trainings of SBIRT which also found increases in SBIRT knowledge.Conclusion: Recommendations based on the results are provided to encourage improved student outcomes from this type of e-learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
期刊最新文献
Large-scale longitudinal analysis of the progression of alcohol use among members of a social media platform: an observational study. Associations between college enrollment and trends in substance use among young adults in the US from 2015 to 2019. Digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Risk factors of overdose in maternal patients with opioid use disorder: a scoping review. Substance use and help seeking as coping behaviors among parents and unpaid caregivers of adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1