在社区寻求治疗的样本中厘清情绪调节、情绪回避和焦虑症状之间的关系。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1111/papt.12523
Rachel C. Bock, Lucas D. Baker, Emily A. Kalantar, Christopher R. Berghoff, Joel C. Stroman, Kim L. Gratz, Matthew T. Tull
{"title":"在社区寻求治疗的样本中厘清情绪调节、情绪回避和焦虑症状之间的关系。","authors":"Rachel C. Bock,&nbsp;Lucas D. Baker,&nbsp;Emily A. Kalantar,&nbsp;Christopher R. Berghoff,&nbsp;Joel C. Stroman,&nbsp;Kim L. Gratz,&nbsp;Matthew T. Tull","doi":"10.1111/papt.12523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Anxiety is a global problem that is readily treatable with psychosocial interventions, though many individuals do not benefit following participation in extant treatment protocols. Accordingly, clarification of process-related variables that may be leveraged to enhance outcomes appears warranted. Emotion regulation (ER) is a robust correlate of anxiety symptoms and is often targeted in behavioural treatments applied to anxiety-related problems. Yet, some evidence suggests ER difficulties may be a proxy variable for emotional avoidance (EA). Clarifying the relative influence of ER and EA on anxiety symptom severity may improve specificity in targeting behavioural processes within psychosocial treatments designed to alleviate anxiety-related suffering. Accordingly, we examined relations of ER and EA to anxiety symptom severity after accounting for anxiety sensitivity and anxiolytic medication use in a community-based treatment-seeking sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A four-step hierarchical linear regression analysis of cross-sectional data provided by a community-based treatment-seeking sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Totally, 120 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 39.18; Female = 58.3%) completed a questionnaire packet upon intake to an anxiety disorders clinic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>EA and ER were strongly correlated, and each accounted for significant variance over and above model covariates. EA was a dominant risk factor for anxiety symptom severity, as ER was not a significant predictor (<i>p</i> = .073) following the inclusion of EA in the model (<i>p</i> = .006).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>EA appears to be a dominant risk factor, and ER a proxy risk factor, for anxiety symptom severity. EA may be an avenue for greater treatment specificity for those with anxiety symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarifying relations of emotion regulation, emotional avoidance and anxiety symptoms in a community-based treatment-seeking sample\",\"authors\":\"Rachel C. Bock,&nbsp;Lucas D. Baker,&nbsp;Emily A. Kalantar,&nbsp;Christopher R. Berghoff,&nbsp;Joel C. Stroman,&nbsp;Kim L. Gratz,&nbsp;Matthew T. Tull\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papt.12523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anxiety is a global problem that is readily treatable with psychosocial interventions, though many individuals do not benefit following participation in extant treatment protocols. Accordingly, clarification of process-related variables that may be leveraged to enhance outcomes appears warranted. Emotion regulation (ER) is a robust correlate of anxiety symptoms and is often targeted in behavioural treatments applied to anxiety-related problems. Yet, some evidence suggests ER difficulties may be a proxy variable for emotional avoidance (EA). Clarifying the relative influence of ER and EA on anxiety symptom severity may improve specificity in targeting behavioural processes within psychosocial treatments designed to alleviate anxiety-related suffering. Accordingly, we examined relations of ER and EA to anxiety symptom severity after accounting for anxiety sensitivity and anxiolytic medication use in a community-based treatment-seeking sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A four-step hierarchical linear regression analysis of cross-sectional data provided by a community-based treatment-seeking sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Totally, 120 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 39.18; Female = 58.3%) completed a questionnaire packet upon intake to an anxiety disorders clinic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>EA and ER were strongly correlated, and each accounted for significant variance over and above model covariates. EA was a dominant risk factor for anxiety symptom severity, as ER was not a significant predictor (<i>p</i> = .073) following the inclusion of EA in the model (<i>p</i> = .006).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>EA appears to be a dominant risk factor, and ER a proxy risk factor, for anxiety symptom severity. EA may be an avenue for greater treatment specificity for those with anxiety symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:焦虑症是一个全球性问题,可以通过社会心理干预进行治疗,但许多人在接受现有的治疗方案后并没有从中受益。因此,我们有必要澄清与治疗过程相关的变量,以提高治疗效果。情绪调节(ER)是焦虑症状的一个重要相关因素,也是焦虑相关问题行为治疗的目标。然而,一些证据表明,情绪调节困难可能是情绪回避(EA)的替代变量。明确情绪回避和情感回避对焦虑症状严重程度的相对影响,可以提高旨在减轻焦虑相关痛苦的社会心理治疗中针对行为过程的特异性。因此,我们在一个以社区为基础的寻求治疗样本中,在考虑了焦虑敏感性和抗焦虑药物使用情况后,研究了ER和EA与焦虑症状严重程度的关系:设计:对社区求治样本提供的横截面数据进行四步分层线性回归分析:共有120名参与者(男性=39.18%;女性=58.3%)在焦虑症诊所就诊时填写了调查问卷:结果:EA和ER具有很强的相关性,且各自都比模型中的协变量具有更大的变异性。EA是焦虑症状严重程度的主要风险因素,因为在将EA纳入模型(p = .006)后,ER并不是一个重要的预测因素(p = .073):结论:EA 似乎是焦虑症状严重程度的主要风险因素,而 ER 则是焦虑症状严重程度的替代风险因素。EA可能是提高焦虑症状患者治疗特异性的一个途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clarifying relations of emotion regulation, emotional avoidance and anxiety symptoms in a community-based treatment-seeking sample

Objectives

Anxiety is a global problem that is readily treatable with psychosocial interventions, though many individuals do not benefit following participation in extant treatment protocols. Accordingly, clarification of process-related variables that may be leveraged to enhance outcomes appears warranted. Emotion regulation (ER) is a robust correlate of anxiety symptoms and is often targeted in behavioural treatments applied to anxiety-related problems. Yet, some evidence suggests ER difficulties may be a proxy variable for emotional avoidance (EA). Clarifying the relative influence of ER and EA on anxiety symptom severity may improve specificity in targeting behavioural processes within psychosocial treatments designed to alleviate anxiety-related suffering. Accordingly, we examined relations of ER and EA to anxiety symptom severity after accounting for anxiety sensitivity and anxiolytic medication use in a community-based treatment-seeking sample.

Design

A four-step hierarchical linear regression analysis of cross-sectional data provided by a community-based treatment-seeking sample.

Methods

Totally, 120 participants (Mage = 39.18; Female = 58.3%) completed a questionnaire packet upon intake to an anxiety disorders clinic.

Results

EA and ER were strongly correlated, and each accounted for significant variance over and above model covariates. EA was a dominant risk factor for anxiety symptom severity, as ER was not a significant predictor (p = .073) following the inclusion of EA in the model (p = .006).

Conclusions

EA appears to be a dominant risk factor, and ER a proxy risk factor, for anxiety symptom severity. EA may be an avenue for greater treatment specificity for those with anxiety symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
期刊最新文献
Adult stakeholders' perspectives on supporting or undermining the mental health of sexual and gender minoritised adolescents. A qualitative study exploring participants experiences of the Mental Imagery for Suicidality in Students Trial. Lost in translation? Qualitative interviews with Australian psychedelic-assisted therapy trial clinicians. ‘Cheering on from the side‐lines’: The perceived impact of romantic partner's commentary and behaviour on maintaining women's appearance anxiety 'Like walking with someone as opposed to trying to catch up to them'-Dynamics at play when clinicians and young people formulate together.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1