投机性摩擦:人工智能之后的公民未来书写

Alexandra Thrall, T. Philip Nichols, Kevin R. Magill
{"title":"投机性摩擦:人工智能之后的公民未来书写","authors":"Alexandra Thrall, T. Philip Nichols, Kevin R. Magill","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study is to examine how young people imagine civic futures through speculative fiction writing about artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The authors argue that young people’s speculative fiction writing about AI not only helps make visible the ways they imagine the impacts of emerging technologies and the modes of collective action available for leveraging, resisting or countering them but also the frictions and fissures between the two.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This practitioner research study used data from student artifacts (speculative fiction stories, prewriting and relevant unit work) as well as classroom fieldnotes. The authors used inductive coding to identify emergent patterns in the ways young people wrote about AI and civics, as well as deductive coding using digital civic ecologies framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study spotlight both the breadth of intractable civic concerns that young people associate with AI, as well as the limitations of the civic frameworks for imagining political interventions to these challenges. Importantly, they also indicate that the process of speculative writing itself can help reconcile this disjuncture by opening space to dwell in, rather than resolve, the tensions between “the speculative” and the “civic.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Teachers might use speculative fiction writing and the digital civic ecologies framework to support students in critically examining possible AI futures and effective civic actions within them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Speculative fiction writing offers an avenue for students to analyze the growing civic concerns posed by emerging platform technologies like AI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501133,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculative frictions: writing civic futures after AI\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Thrall, T. Philip Nichols, Kevin R. Magill\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of this study is to examine how young people imagine civic futures through speculative fiction writing about artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The authors argue that young people’s speculative fiction writing about AI not only helps make visible the ways they imagine the impacts of emerging technologies and the modes of collective action available for leveraging, resisting or countering them but also the frictions and fissures between the two.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This practitioner research study used data from student artifacts (speculative fiction stories, prewriting and relevant unit work) as well as classroom fieldnotes. The authors used inductive coding to identify emergent patterns in the ways young people wrote about AI and civics, as well as deductive coding using digital civic ecologies framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings of this study spotlight both the breadth of intractable civic concerns that young people associate with AI, as well as the limitations of the civic frameworks for imagining political interventions to these challenges. Importantly, they also indicate that the process of speculative writing itself can help reconcile this disjuncture by opening space to dwell in, rather than resolve, the tensions between “the speculative” and the “civic.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Teachers might use speculative fiction writing and the digital civic ecologies framework to support students in critically examining possible AI futures and effective civic actions within them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Speculative fiction writing offers an avenue for students to analyze the growing civic concerns posed by emerging platform technologies like AI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":501133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨年轻人如何通过关于人工智能(AI)技术的推理小说创作来想象公民的未来。作者认为,年轻人关于人工智能的推理小说写作不仅有助于让人们看到他们想象新兴技术的影响以及利用、抵制或对抗新兴技术的集体行动模式,还有助于让人们看到这两者之间的摩擦和裂痕。设计/方法/方法这项实践研究使用了学生作品(推理小说故事、预习写作和相关单元作业)以及课堂现场笔记中的数据。作者使用归纳编码来识别年轻人书写人工智能和公民的方式中出现的模式,并使用数字公民生态框架进行演绎编码。研究结果本研究的结果既突出了年轻人与人工智能相关联的棘手公民问题的广泛性,也突出了想象政治干预这些挑战的公民框架的局限性。重要的是,这些研究还表明,推测性写作过程本身可以帮助调和这种矛盾,为 "推测 "和 "公民 "之间的紧张关系提供空间,而不是解决这种紧张关系。"实践意义教师可以利用推理小说写作和数字公民生态框架,支持学生批判性地审视可能的人工智能未来以及其中有效的公民行动。原创性/价值推理小说写作为学生分析人工智能等新兴平台技术带来的日益增长的公民关切提供了一个途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Speculative frictions: writing civic futures after AI

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine how young people imagine civic futures through speculative fiction writing about artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The authors argue that young people’s speculative fiction writing about AI not only helps make visible the ways they imagine the impacts of emerging technologies and the modes of collective action available for leveraging, resisting or countering them but also the frictions and fissures between the two.

Design/methodology/approach

This practitioner research study used data from student artifacts (speculative fiction stories, prewriting and relevant unit work) as well as classroom fieldnotes. The authors used inductive coding to identify emergent patterns in the ways young people wrote about AI and civics, as well as deductive coding using digital civic ecologies framework.

Findings

The findings of this study spotlight both the breadth of intractable civic concerns that young people associate with AI, as well as the limitations of the civic frameworks for imagining political interventions to these challenges. Importantly, they also indicate that the process of speculative writing itself can help reconcile this disjuncture by opening space to dwell in, rather than resolve, the tensions between “the speculative” and the “civic.”

Practical implications

Teachers might use speculative fiction writing and the digital civic ecologies framework to support students in critically examining possible AI futures and effective civic actions within them.

Originality/value

Speculative fiction writing offers an avenue for students to analyze the growing civic concerns posed by emerging platform technologies like AI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting a languaging approach for teaching about the climate crisis in English language arts Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education I apologize: body positivity love movements “We're loud, why aren't you?” Laura’s social media activism through justice-oriented literacies Loving the skin, you’re in: a deconstruction of children’s literature that focus on body (size) issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1