西班牙射血分数全谱心衰患者服用安格列净的成本效益分析:EMPEROR-Preserved 和 EMPEROR-Reduced 试验的综合结果。

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/14779072.2024.2324027
Xavier García-Moll, Francesco Croci, Alexandra Solé, Elisabeth S Hartgers-Gubbels, Miguel A Calleja-Hernández
{"title":"西班牙射血分数全谱心衰患者服用安格列净的成本效益分析:EMPEROR-Preserved 和 EMPEROR-Reduced 试验的综合结果。","authors":"Xavier García-Moll, Francesco Croci, Alexandra Solé, Elisabeth S Hartgers-Gubbels, Miguel A Calleja-Hernández","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2324027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition with considerable clinical burden for patients and economic burden for healthcare systems. Treatment for HF is typically based on ejection fraction (EF) phenotype. The cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin + standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC has been examined for HF phenotypes below or above 40% EF separately, but not across the full spectrum of EF in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of two preexisting, validated, and published phenotype-specific Markov cohort models were combined using a population-weighted approach, reflecting the incidence of each phenotype in the total HF population in Spain. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed by sampling each model's probabilistic results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC resulted in increased life-years (LYs) (6.48 vs. 6.35), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) (4.80 vs. 4.63), and healthcare costs (€19,090 vs. €18,246), over a lifetime time horizon for the combined HF population in Spain. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €5,089/QALY. All subgroup, scenario, and probabilistic ICERs were consistently below €10,000/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empagliflozin is the first treatment with established efficacy and cost-effectiveness for HF patients across EF from the perspective of healthcare payers in Spain. Empagliflozin also proved to be cost-effective for all subgroups of patients included in the analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"131-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin for heart failure patients across the full spectrum of ejection fraction in Spain: combined results of the EMPEROR-Preserved and EMPEROR-Reduced trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xavier García-Moll, Francesco Croci, Alexandra Solé, Elisabeth S Hartgers-Gubbels, Miguel A Calleja-Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14779072.2024.2324027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition with considerable clinical burden for patients and economic burden for healthcare systems. Treatment for HF is typically based on ejection fraction (EF) phenotype. The cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin + standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC has been examined for HF phenotypes below or above 40% EF separately, but not across the full spectrum of EF in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of two preexisting, validated, and published phenotype-specific Markov cohort models were combined using a population-weighted approach, reflecting the incidence of each phenotype in the total HF population in Spain. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed by sampling each model's probabilistic results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC resulted in increased life-years (LYs) (6.48 vs. 6.35), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) (4.80 vs. 4.63), and healthcare costs (€19,090 vs. €18,246), over a lifetime time horizon for the combined HF population in Spain. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €5,089/QALY. All subgroup, scenario, and probabilistic ICERs were consistently below €10,000/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empagliflozin is the first treatment with established efficacy and cost-effectiveness for HF patients across EF from the perspective of healthcare payers in Spain. Empagliflozin also proved to be cost-effective for all subgroups of patients included in the analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2324027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2324027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一种慢性疾病,给患者带来沉重的临床负担,也给医疗系统带来沉重的经济负担。心力衰竭的治疗通常基于射血分数(EF)表型。在西班牙,针对射血分数低于或高于 40% 的心房颤动表型,分别研究了 empagliflozin + 标准护理(SoC)与标准护理(SoC)相比的成本效益,但未对射血分数的所有表型进行研究:方法: 采用人口加权法,将两个已存在、经过验证且已发表的表型特异性马尔可夫队列模型的结果合并在一起,以反映西班牙全部 HF 人口中每种表型的发病率。通过对每个模型的概率结果取样,进行了概率敏感性分析:结果:与SoC相比,Empagliflozin + SoC可使西班牙合并HF人群在终生时间范围内的生命年数(LYs)(6.48 vs. 6.35)、质量调整生命年数(QALYs)(4.80 vs. 4.63)和医疗成本(19,090欧元 vs. 18,246欧元)增加。增量成本效益比 (ICER) 为 5089 欧元/QALY。所有亚组、情景和概率 ICER 始终低于 10,000 欧元/QALY:从西班牙医疗支付方的角度来看,Empagliflozin 是第一种对不同 EF 的高血压患者具有公认疗效和成本效益的治疗方法。事实证明,对于纳入分析的所有亚组患者,恩格列净都具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin for heart failure patients across the full spectrum of ejection fraction in Spain: combined results of the EMPEROR-Preserved and EMPEROR-Reduced trials.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition with considerable clinical burden for patients and economic burden for healthcare systems. Treatment for HF is typically based on ejection fraction (EF) phenotype. The cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin + standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC has been examined for HF phenotypes below or above 40% EF separately, but not across the full spectrum of EF in Spain.

Methods: The results of two preexisting, validated, and published phenotype-specific Markov cohort models were combined using a population-weighted approach, reflecting the incidence of each phenotype in the total HF population in Spain. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed by sampling each model's probabilistic results.

Results: Empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC resulted in increased life-years (LYs) (6.48 vs. 6.35), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) (4.80 vs. 4.63), and healthcare costs (€19,090 vs. €18,246), over a lifetime time horizon for the combined HF population in Spain. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €5,089/QALY. All subgroup, scenario, and probabilistic ICERs were consistently below €10,000/QALY.

Conclusions: Empagliflozin is the first treatment with established efficacy and cost-effectiveness for HF patients across EF from the perspective of healthcare payers in Spain. Empagliflozin also proved to be cost-effective for all subgroups of patients included in the analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Risk management of patients with multiple CVDs: what are the best practices? Contemporary review of the evolution of various treatment modalities for mitral regurgitation. Treatment of hypertension in the elderly: target the lowest well tolerated blood pressure. Short-term and long-term outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiogenic shock. Nattokinase as an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for non-communicable diseases: a review of fibrinolytic, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1