维持性透析患者全因死亡率预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Renal Failure Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322039
Jingcan Wu, Xuehong Li, Hong Zhang, Lin Lin, Man Li, Gangyi Chen, Cheng Wang
{"title":"维持性透析患者全因死亡率预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jingcan Wu, Xuehong Li, Hong Zhang, Lin Lin, Man Li, Gangyi Chen, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality risk varies considerably among individual dialysis patients. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly predictive model for predicting all-cause mortality among dialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data regarding dialysis patients were obtained from two hospitals. Patients in training cohort (<i>N</i> = 1421) were recruited from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, and patients in external validation cohort (<i>N</i> = 429) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The follow-up endpoint event was all-cause death. Variables were selected by LASSO-Cox regression, and the model was constructed by Cox regression, which was presented in the form of nomogram and web-based tool. The discrimination and accuracy of the prediction model were assessed using <i>C</i>-indexes and calibration curves, while the clinical value was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best predictors of 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortality contained nine independent factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, urine volume, hemoglobin (HGB), albumin (ALB), and pleural effusion (PE). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year <i>C</i>-indexes in the training set (0.840, 0.866, and 0.846, respectively) and validation set (0.746, 0.783, and 0.741, respectively) were consistent with comparable performance. According to the calibration curve, the nomogram predicted survival accurately matched the actual survival rate. The DCA showed the nomogram got more clinical net benefit in both the training and validation sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effective and convenient nomogram may help clinicians quantify the risk of mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":"46 1","pages":"2322039"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a prediction model for all-cause mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jingcan Wu, Xuehong Li, Hong Zhang, Lin Lin, Man Li, Gangyi Chen, Cheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality risk varies considerably among individual dialysis patients. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly predictive model for predicting all-cause mortality among dialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data regarding dialysis patients were obtained from two hospitals. Patients in training cohort (<i>N</i> = 1421) were recruited from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, and patients in external validation cohort (<i>N</i> = 429) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The follow-up endpoint event was all-cause death. Variables were selected by LASSO-Cox regression, and the model was constructed by Cox regression, which was presented in the form of nomogram and web-based tool. The discrimination and accuracy of the prediction model were assessed using <i>C</i>-indexes and calibration curves, while the clinical value was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best predictors of 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortality contained nine independent factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, urine volume, hemoglobin (HGB), albumin (ALB), and pleural effusion (PE). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year <i>C</i>-indexes in the training set (0.840, 0.866, and 0.846, respectively) and validation set (0.746, 0.783, and 0.741, respectively) were consistent with comparable performance. According to the calibration curve, the nomogram predicted survival accurately matched the actual survival rate. The DCA showed the nomogram got more clinical net benefit in both the training and validation sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effective and convenient nomogram may help clinicians quantify the risk of mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal Failure\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"2322039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同透析患者的死亡风险差异很大。本研究旨在开发一个用户友好型预测模型,用于预测透析患者的全因死亡率:方法:从两家医院获得透析患者的回顾性数据。方法:透析患者的回顾性数据来自两家医院,训练队列中的患者(N = 1421)来自中山大学附属第五医院,外部验证队列中的患者(N = 429)来自广州中医药大学附属第一医院。随访终点事件为全因死亡。采用LASSO-Cox回归法选择变量,并通过Cox回归法构建模型,该模型以提名图和网络工具的形式呈现。预测模型的区分度和准确性通过C指数和校准曲线进行评估,临床价值则通过决策曲线分析(DCA)进行评估:1年、3年和5年全因死亡率的最佳预测因子包含9个独立因素,包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病(DM)、心血管疾病(CVD)、癌症、尿量、血红蛋白(HGB)、白蛋白(ALB)和胸腔积液(PE)。训练集(分别为 0.840、0.866 和 0.846)和验证集(分别为 0.746、0.783 和 0.741)中的 1 年、3 年和 5 年 C 指数一致,性能相当。根据校准曲线,提名图预测的存活率与实际存活率准确吻合。DCA显示,在训练集和验证集中,提名图都获得了更多的临床净收益:结论:有效、便捷的提名图可以帮助临床医生量化维持性透析患者的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a prediction model for all-cause mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Background: The mortality risk varies considerably among individual dialysis patients. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly predictive model for predicting all-cause mortality among dialysis patients.

Methods: Retrospective data regarding dialysis patients were obtained from two hospitals. Patients in training cohort (N = 1421) were recruited from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, and patients in external validation cohort (N = 429) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The follow-up endpoint event was all-cause death. Variables were selected by LASSO-Cox regression, and the model was constructed by Cox regression, which was presented in the form of nomogram and web-based tool. The discrimination and accuracy of the prediction model were assessed using C-indexes and calibration curves, while the clinical value was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The best predictors of 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortality contained nine independent factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, urine volume, hemoglobin (HGB), albumin (ALB), and pleural effusion (PE). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year C-indexes in the training set (0.840, 0.866, and 0.846, respectively) and validation set (0.746, 0.783, and 0.741, respectively) were consistent with comparable performance. According to the calibration curve, the nomogram predicted survival accurately matched the actual survival rate. The DCA showed the nomogram got more clinical net benefit in both the training and validation sets.

Conclusions: The effective and convenient nomogram may help clinicians quantify the risk of mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
期刊最新文献
The use of urinary kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosis of hepato-renal syndrome in advanced cirrhotic patients. Identification of common and specific fibrosis-related genes in three common chronic kidney diseases. A Mendelian randomization study: physical activities and chronic kidney disease. Association between normal saline infusion volume in the emergency department and acute kidney injury in heat stroke patients: a multicenter retrospective study. Association of frequent intradialytic hypotension with the clinical outcomes of patients on hemodialysis: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1