基于癫痫患者的临床和定量脑电图特征,构建识别癫痫患者合并焦虑症的机器学习模型

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107333
Zhe Ren , Bin Wang , Mengyan Yue , Jiuyan Han , Yanan Chen , Ting Zhao , Na Wang , Jun Xu , Pan Zhao , Mingmin Li , Lei Sun , Bin Wen , Zongya Zhao , Xiong Han
{"title":"基于癫痫患者的临床和定量脑电图特征,构建识别癫痫患者合并焦虑症的机器学习模型","authors":"Zhe Ren ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Mengyan Yue ,&nbsp;Jiuyan Han ,&nbsp;Yanan Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhao ,&nbsp;Na Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Xu ,&nbsp;Pan Zhao ,&nbsp;Mingmin Li ,&nbsp;Lei Sun ,&nbsp;Bin Wen ,&nbsp;Zongya Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiong Han","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to construct prediction models for the recognizing of anxiety disorders (AD) in patients with epilepsy (PWEs) by combining clinical features with quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) features and using machine learning (ML).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nineteen clinical features and 20-min resting-state EEG were collected from 71 PWEs comorbid with AD and another 60 PWEs without AD who met the inclusion-exclusion criteria of this study. The EEG were preprocessed and 684 Phase Locking Value (PLV) and 76 Lempel–Ziv Complexity (LZC) features on four bands were extracted. The Fisher score method was used to rank all the derived features. We constructed four models for recognizing AD in PWEs, whether PWEs based on different combinations of features using eXtreme gradient boosting (XGboost) and evaluated these models using the five-fold cross-validation method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prediction model constructed by combining the clinical, PLV, and LZC features showed the best performance, with an accuracy of 96.18%, precision of 94.29%, sensitivity of 98.33%, F1-score of 96.06%, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.96. The Fisher score ranking results displayed that the top ten features were depression, educational attainment, α_P3<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, α_T6-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, α_F7<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, β_Fp2-O1<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, θ_T4-Cz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, θ_F7-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, α_Fp2<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, and θ_T4-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The model, constructed by combining the clinical and qEEG features PLV and LZC, efficiently identified the presence of AD comorbidity in PWEs and might have the potential to complement the clinical diagnosis. Our findings suggest that LZC features in the α band and PLV features in Fp2-O1 may be potential biomarkers for diagnosing AD in PWEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction of machine learning models for recognizing comorbid anxiety in epilepsy patients based on their clinical and quantitative EEG features\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Ren ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Mengyan Yue ,&nbsp;Jiuyan Han ,&nbsp;Yanan Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhao ,&nbsp;Na Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Xu ,&nbsp;Pan Zhao ,&nbsp;Mingmin Li ,&nbsp;Lei Sun ,&nbsp;Bin Wen ,&nbsp;Zongya Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiong Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to construct prediction models for the recognizing of anxiety disorders (AD) in patients with epilepsy (PWEs) by combining clinical features with quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) features and using machine learning (ML).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nineteen clinical features and 20-min resting-state EEG were collected from 71 PWEs comorbid with AD and another 60 PWEs without AD who met the inclusion-exclusion criteria of this study. The EEG were preprocessed and 684 Phase Locking Value (PLV) and 76 Lempel–Ziv Complexity (LZC) features on four bands were extracted. The Fisher score method was used to rank all the derived features. We constructed four models for recognizing AD in PWEs, whether PWEs based on different combinations of features using eXtreme gradient boosting (XGboost) and evaluated these models using the five-fold cross-validation method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prediction model constructed by combining the clinical, PLV, and LZC features showed the best performance, with an accuracy of 96.18%, precision of 94.29%, sensitivity of 98.33%, F1-score of 96.06%, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.96. The Fisher score ranking results displayed that the top ten features were depression, educational attainment, α_P3<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, α_T6-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, α_F7<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, β_Fp2-O1<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, θ_T4-Cz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, θ_F7-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>, α_Fp2<sub><em>LZC</em></sub>, and θ_T4-Pz<sub><em>PLV</em></sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The model, constructed by combining the clinical and qEEG features PLV and LZC, efficiently identified the presence of AD comorbidity in PWEs and might have the potential to complement the clinical diagnosis. Our findings suggest that LZC features in the α band and PLV features in Fp2-O1 may be potential biomarkers for diagnosing AD in PWEs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究旨在通过将临床特征与定量脑电图(qEEG)特征相结合,并利用机器学习(ML),构建用于识别癫痫患者焦虑症(AD)的预测模型。方法收集了符合本研究纳入-排除标准的71名合并AD的癫痫患者和60名无AD的癫痫患者的19个临床特征和20分钟静息态脑电图。脑电图经过预处理,提取了四个波段上的 684 个锁相值(PLV)和 76 个 Lempel-Ziv 复杂性(LZC)特征。我们采用费雪评分法对所有提取的特征进行排序。结果综合临床、PLV 和 LZC 特征构建的预测模型表现最佳,准确率为 96.18%,精确度为 94.29%,灵敏度为 98.33%,F1-score 为 96.06%,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.96。费舍尔得分排名结果显示,前十位特征分别是抑郁、教育程度、α_P3LZC、α_T6-PzPLV、α_F7LZC、β_Fp2-O1PLV、θ_T4-CzPLV、θ_F7-PzPLV、α_Fp2LZC 和 θ_T4-PzPLV。结论该模型结合了临床和 qEEG 特征 PLV 和 LZC,能有效识别 PWE 中是否存在 AD 合并症,并有可能补充临床诊断。我们的研究结果表明,α波段的LZC特征和Fp2-O1的PLV特征可能是诊断PWEs中AD的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construction of machine learning models for recognizing comorbid anxiety in epilepsy patients based on their clinical and quantitative EEG features

Background

This study aimed to construct prediction models for the recognizing of anxiety disorders (AD) in patients with epilepsy (PWEs) by combining clinical features with quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) features and using machine learning (ML).

Methods

Nineteen clinical features and 20-min resting-state EEG were collected from 71 PWEs comorbid with AD and another 60 PWEs without AD who met the inclusion-exclusion criteria of this study. The EEG were preprocessed and 684 Phase Locking Value (PLV) and 76 Lempel–Ziv Complexity (LZC) features on four bands were extracted. The Fisher score method was used to rank all the derived features. We constructed four models for recognizing AD in PWEs, whether PWEs based on different combinations of features using eXtreme gradient boosting (XGboost) and evaluated these models using the five-fold cross-validation method.

Results

The prediction model constructed by combining the clinical, PLV, and LZC features showed the best performance, with an accuracy of 96.18%, precision of 94.29%, sensitivity of 98.33%, F1-score of 96.06%, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.96. The Fisher score ranking results displayed that the top ten features were depression, educational attainment, α_P3LZC, α_T6-PzPLV, α_F7LZC, β_Fp2-O1PLV, θ_T4-CzPLV, θ_F7-PzPLV, α_Fp2LZC, and θ_T4-PzPLV.

Conclusions

The model, constructed by combining the clinical and qEEG features PLV and LZC, efficiently identified the presence of AD comorbidity in PWEs and might have the potential to complement the clinical diagnosis. Our findings suggest that LZC features in the α band and PLV features in Fp2-O1 may be potential biomarkers for diagnosing AD in PWEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1