As the Raven flies: nest control with drones

Monitoring of breeding success in wildlife is key for evaluating population trends and support conservation measures. However, it is challenging depending on breeding places or non-accessible habitat. In recent years, new technologies were applied to studies of bird biology, i.e. drones. UAV (drones) are available to study new aspects of bird ecology, which are not available using traditional methods. The Raven Corvus corax predominantly nests in upper tree canopies or on high cliffs. Hence, it is challenging to monitor it breeding success from the ground. Our study were conducted in forests in NE Poland, on the 77 arboreal Raven nests in 2021–2022. By using drones, we investigated (i) whether the classic data on breeding success from ground observations differ from those of nest inspections via drone, and (ii) to what extent the adult birds behave when the drone is used at the nest. The inspection from the ground failed to determine the contents of as many as 30% of the occupied nests. Inspections using a drone and those made from the ground yielded different results, as aerial assessment showed a higher number of the young (respectively 1.93 vs. 3.22 per successful brood). Broods with three young accounted for 6.5% of nests controlled from the ground and 23.3% using a drone, while broods with two young accounted for 33.8% and 10.4% of nests, respectively. During most of the inspected nests (65% of the cases), adult birds sat nearby in the tree tops and called. In 12% of the cases, the birds flew close to the nest, passing the drone at a distance of more than 20 m, and did not attempt to approach the device. In four cases, adult birds closed the drone at less than 10 m. A direct collision did not happen. The most vital reactions were recorded in several instances (only 4.2%) in which the birds were not near the nest when the inspection began but arrived during the inspection. Drone surveys have revealed previously un-described behavior of birds, alarmed at the examination of empty nests. In 50 nests, 65% of the cases, the Raven tolerated the drone’s presence at the nest, although the birds showed concern and occasionally defensive reactions. It seems that the adverse reaction of birds is weaker when they associate the appearance of a drone with human presence. Key recommendations: control in teams of two - operator and observer, starting end landing in close vicinity of the nest tree, immediate interruption of flight if birds react, forbade flying directly over the nest. It is advisable to check the reaction of adult Ravens to drone inspections of nests with small nestlings. To sum up, our study showed that the drone inspections did not harm the adult birds but provides a more reliable data for reproduction than the observation from ground.