Jacob A Worden, Andrew M Gabig, Hayden L Cooke, Michael B Gottschalk, Eric R Wagner
{"title":"关于肘关节外科的 100 篇经典和当代论文:肘部手术文献趋势分析。","authors":"Jacob A Worden, Andrew M Gabig, Hayden L Cooke, Michael B Gottschalk, Eric R Wagner","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bibliometric analyses provide an aggregate of the most frequently cited literature in a given field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the top 100 most-cited classical and contemporary papers relating to elbow surgery to serve as a reference for surgeons and trainees for educational and research purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted for all papers containing the term \"elbow\" in the categories Orthopedics, Surgery, and Sports Science in the Clarivate Web of Science. Classical papers were those published from 1980 to 2009, and contemporary papers were those published from 2010 to 2019. Articles were assessed by country of origin, authors and their credentials, parent journal, level of evidence, and topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Citation frequency ranged from 86 to 867. Among the classical group, there were more level IV papers compared with level I papers; however, the opposite was true in the contemporary group. The most common topic in the classical group was elbow anatomy and function, and the most common topic in the contemporary group was lateral epicondylitis and medial epicondylitis and associated therapies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This bibliometric analysis serves to help guide surgeons and trainees on the highly cited articles and important topics in elbow surgery, demonstrating a shift to prospective randomized controlled trials in recent years.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V (Systematic Review with Level V as Lowest LOE).</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Top 100 Classical and Contemporary Papers on Elbow Surgery: A Trend Analysis of Elbow Surgery Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob A Worden, Andrew M Gabig, Hayden L Cooke, Michael B Gottschalk, Eric R Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bibliometric analyses provide an aggregate of the most frequently cited literature in a given field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the top 100 most-cited classical and contemporary papers relating to elbow surgery to serve as a reference for surgeons and trainees for educational and research purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted for all papers containing the term \\\"elbow\\\" in the categories Orthopedics, Surgery, and Sports Science in the Clarivate Web of Science. Classical papers were those published from 1980 to 2009, and contemporary papers were those published from 2010 to 2019. Articles were assessed by country of origin, authors and their credentials, parent journal, level of evidence, and topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Citation frequency ranged from 86 to 867. Among the classical group, there were more level IV papers compared with level I papers; however, the opposite was true in the contemporary group. The most common topic in the classical group was elbow anatomy and function, and the most common topic in the contemporary group was lateral epicondylitis and medial epicondylitis and associated therapies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This bibliometric analysis serves to help guide surgeons and trainees on the highly cited articles and important topics in elbow surgery, demonstrating a shift to prospective randomized controlled trials in recent years.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V (Systematic Review with Level V as Lowest LOE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介文献计量学分析提供了特定领域中最常被引用文献的总和。本研究的目的是分析与肘部手术相关的经典和现代论文中被引用次数最多的前 100 篇,为外科医生和受训人员的教育和研究提供参考:方法:在Clarivate Web of Science中搜索了所有包含 "肘部 "一词的论文,分类为骨科、外科和运动科学。经典论文指 1980 年至 2009 年发表的论文,当代论文指 2010 年至 2019 年发表的论文。文章按照来源国、作者及其资历、母刊、证据级别和主题进行评估:引用频率从86次到867次不等。在经典组中,IV 级论文多于 I 级论文;但在当代组中,情况恰恰相反。经典组中最常见的主题是肘部解剖和功能,而当代组中最常见的主题是外侧上髁炎和内侧上髁炎及相关疗法:该文献计量学分析有助于指导外科医生和受训人员了解肘关节手术中的高引用率文章和重要主题,显示了近年来向前瞻性随机对照试验的转变:五级(系统综述,五级为最低LOE)。
The Top 100 Classical and Contemporary Papers on Elbow Surgery: A Trend Analysis of Elbow Surgery Literature.
Introduction: Bibliometric analyses provide an aggregate of the most frequently cited literature in a given field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the top 100 most-cited classical and contemporary papers relating to elbow surgery to serve as a reference for surgeons and trainees for educational and research purposes.
Methods: A search was conducted for all papers containing the term "elbow" in the categories Orthopedics, Surgery, and Sports Science in the Clarivate Web of Science. Classical papers were those published from 1980 to 2009, and contemporary papers were those published from 2010 to 2019. Articles were assessed by country of origin, authors and their credentials, parent journal, level of evidence, and topic.
Results: Citation frequency ranged from 86 to 867. Among the classical group, there were more level IV papers compared with level I papers; however, the opposite was true in the contemporary group. The most common topic in the classical group was elbow anatomy and function, and the most common topic in the contemporary group was lateral epicondylitis and medial epicondylitis and associated therapies.
Discussion: This bibliometric analysis serves to help guide surgeons and trainees on the highly cited articles and important topics in elbow surgery, demonstrating a shift to prospective randomized controlled trials in recent years.
Level of evidence: Level V (Systematic Review with Level V as Lowest LOE).