以人为本的规划在医疗补助家庭和社区服务中的成果。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae017
Natalie Chong, Joseph Caldwell, H Stephen Kaye, Monika Mitra
{"title":"以人为本的规划在医疗补助家庭和社区服务中的成果。","authors":"Natalie Chong, Joseph Caldwell, H Stephen Kaye, Monika Mitra","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Person-centered planning (PCP) allows recipients of home- and community-based service (HCBS) to plan services and supports according to their preferences and needs. The extent to which HCBS systems engage in PCP and evidence for the relationship between PCP and beneficiary outcomes are limited. We examine the prevalence of PCP among HCBS recipients and the relationship between PCP and person-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used the 2018-2019 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey, collected among adult Medicaid HCBS recipients in 12 states (n = 5,849). We examined 2 general PCP measures (1 on decision making and another on whether service plans reflected preferences/choices). We also constructed a scale to assess the fidelity of recipients' service planning meeting to the PCP process. Outcomes included unmet service needs and community living (i.e., participation, control, and satisfaction). We examined recipient characteristics associated with PCP and used adjusted logistic regression models to assess the relationship between PCP and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 72% of HCBS recipients were involved in decision making, 72% reported their service plan reflected their preferences/choices, and 47% had meetings that scored \"high fidelity\" on the PCP fidelity scale. PCP measures were consistently related to lower likelihood of unmet service needs and greater likelihood of experiencing community living outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings suggest PCP is important for adequately meeting service needs and ensuring community living among HCBS beneficiaries. Additional standardized measures should be developed to facilitate quality improvement and accountability for delivering person-centered HCBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Person-Centered Planning in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Chong, Joseph Caldwell, H Stephen Kaye, Monika Mitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Person-centered planning (PCP) allows recipients of home- and community-based service (HCBS) to plan services and supports according to their preferences and needs. The extent to which HCBS systems engage in PCP and evidence for the relationship between PCP and beneficiary outcomes are limited. We examine the prevalence of PCP among HCBS recipients and the relationship between PCP and person-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used the 2018-2019 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey, collected among adult Medicaid HCBS recipients in 12 states (n = 5,849). We examined 2 general PCP measures (1 on decision making and another on whether service plans reflected preferences/choices). We also constructed a scale to assess the fidelity of recipients' service planning meeting to the PCP process. Outcomes included unmet service needs and community living (i.e., participation, control, and satisfaction). We examined recipient characteristics associated with PCP and used adjusted logistic regression models to assess the relationship between PCP and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 72% of HCBS recipients were involved in decision making, 72% reported their service plan reflected their preferences/choices, and 47% had meetings that scored \\\"high fidelity\\\" on the PCP fidelity scale. PCP measures were consistently related to lower likelihood of unmet service needs and greater likelihood of experiencing community living outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings suggest PCP is important for adequately meeting service needs and ensuring community living among HCBS beneficiaries. Additional standardized measures should be developed to facilitate quality improvement and accountability for delivering person-centered HCBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:以人为本的规划(PCP)允许家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的受益人根据自己的偏好和需求来规划服务和支持。居家和社区服务系统参与 PCP 的程度以及 PCP 与受益人结果之间关系的证据都很有限。我们研究了在 HCBS 受助者中 PCP 的普遍程度,以及 PCP 与个人报告结果之间的关系:我们使用了 2018-2019 年国家核心指标--老龄和残疾调查,该调查是在 12 个州的成年医疗补助 HCBS 受助人中收集的(n = 5,849 人)。我们研究了两个一般的 PCP 测量(一个关于决策,另一个关于服务计划是否反映了偏好/选择)。我们还构建了一个量表来评估受助者的服务规划会议是否忠实于以人为本的规划流程。结果包括未满足的服务需求和社区生活(即参与、控制和满意度)。我们研究了与 "以人为本的规划 "相关的受助者特征,并使用调整后的逻辑回归模型来评估 "以人为本的规划 "与结果之间的关系:约 72% 的 HCBS 受助人参与了决策,72% 的受助人称他们的服务计划反映了他们的偏好/选择,47% 的受助人的会议在 PCP 忠诚度量表中得分 "高忠诚度"。PCP 措施始终与较低的未满足服务需求可能性和较高的社区生活成果可能性相关:研究结果表明,PCP 对于充分满足服务需求和确保 HCBS 受益人的社区生活非常重要。应制定更多标准化措施,以促进以人为本的 HCBS 的质量改进和问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Person-Centered Planning in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services.

Background and objectives: Person-centered planning (PCP) allows recipients of home- and community-based service (HCBS) to plan services and supports according to their preferences and needs. The extent to which HCBS systems engage in PCP and evidence for the relationship between PCP and beneficiary outcomes are limited. We examine the prevalence of PCP among HCBS recipients and the relationship between PCP and person-reported outcomes.

Research design and methods: We used the 2018-2019 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey, collected among adult Medicaid HCBS recipients in 12 states (n = 5,849). We examined 2 general PCP measures (1 on decision making and another on whether service plans reflected preferences/choices). We also constructed a scale to assess the fidelity of recipients' service planning meeting to the PCP process. Outcomes included unmet service needs and community living (i.e., participation, control, and satisfaction). We examined recipient characteristics associated with PCP and used adjusted logistic regression models to assess the relationship between PCP and outcomes.

Results: About 72% of HCBS recipients were involved in decision making, 72% reported their service plan reflected their preferences/choices, and 47% had meetings that scored "high fidelity" on the PCP fidelity scale. PCP measures were consistently related to lower likelihood of unmet service needs and greater likelihood of experiencing community living outcomes.

Discussion and implications: Findings suggest PCP is important for adequately meeting service needs and ensuring community living among HCBS beneficiaries. Additional standardized measures should be developed to facilitate quality improvement and accountability for delivering person-centered HCBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between physical capability, social support, loneliness, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction in older adults. Covid-19 Impacts on Physical Activity among Community-dwelling Older Adults with Memory Problems: The Moderating Role of Walkable Neighborhood Destinations. Finding the Balance to Quiet the Striving: The Difference Between Successful Aging and Wise Aging. Impacts of acculturation on depressive symptoms and activities of daily living of U.S. older Chinese immigrants. Later-Life Creativity and Successful Aging in Neoliberal Agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1