与滥用监督研究相关的测量伪影:对 Mackey 等人(2017 年)分析的再审视

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pto.2023.12.002
J. Veilleux Deschênes , C. Sénéchal , S. Larivée , L. Brunet
{"title":"与滥用监督研究相关的测量伪影:对 Mackey 等人(2017 年)分析的再审视","authors":"J. Veilleux Deschênes ,&nbsp;C. Sénéchal ,&nbsp;S. Larivée ,&nbsp;L. Brunet","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 29-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artéfacts de mesure associés à l'étude de la supervision abusive : un second regard aux analyses de Mackey et al. (2017)\",\"authors\":\"J. Veilleux Deschênes ,&nbsp;C. Sénéchal ,&nbsp;S. Larivée ,&nbsp;L. Brunet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pto.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253023001024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253023001024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滥用权力的领导者利用羞辱、贬低和操纵来影响员工实现与工作相关的目标。更好地了解助长滥用职权的前因后果和机制,有助于调整组织流程,减少滥用职权现象的发生和负面影响。然而,与衡量滥用性监督有关的问题需要引起注意,如工具和变体的多样性,以及在衡量不同文化背景下的构建时可能存在的差异。本系统综述侧重于 2015-2020 年间发表的对 Tepper(2000 年)的滥用性督导进行定量测量的前流行病学实证研究,旨在增加有关目标测量问题的知识。其目的是帮助研究人员和从业人员选择和调整测量工具,以便更有效地捕捉该建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artéfacts de mesure associés à l'étude de la supervision abusive : un second regard aux analyses de Mackey et al. (2017)

An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Estime de soi : un médiateur entre le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et le bien-être positif au travail ? Un outil n’est pas fait pour s’épanouir. Le rôle médiateur de l’auto-objectification entre la déshumanisation organisationnelle et l’épanouissement psychologique au travail Engagement de continuité et santé mentale des employés : le rôle des traits d’affectivité
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1