额颞叶痴呆症临床亚型和主要症状的萎缩网络图。

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae067
Min Chu, Deming Jiang, Dan Li, Shaozhen Yan, Li Liu, Haitian Nan, Yingtao Wang, Yihao Wang, Ailing Yue, Liankun Ren, Kewei Chen, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Jie Lu, Liyong Wu
{"title":"额颞叶痴呆症临床亚型和主要症状的萎缩网络图。","authors":"Min Chu, Deming Jiang, Dan Li, Shaozhen Yan, Li Liu, Haitian Nan, Yingtao Wang, Yihao Wang, Ailing Yue, Liankun Ren, Kewei Chen, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Jie Lu, Liyong Wu","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a disease of high heterogeneity, apathy and disinhibition present in all subtypes of FTD and imposes a significant burden on families/society. Traditional neuroimaging analysis has limitations in elucidating the network localization due to individual clinical and neuroanatomical variability. The study aims to identify the atrophy network map associated with different FTD clinical subtypes and determine the specific localization of the network for apathy and disinhibition. Eighty FTD patients [45 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and 35 semantic variant progressive primary aphasia (svPPA)] and 58 healthy controls at Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled as Dataset 1; 112 FTD patients including 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA and 30 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) cases, and 110 healthy controls from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI) dataset were included as Dataset 2. Initially, single-subject atrophy maps were defined by comparing cortical thickness in each FTD patient versus healthy controls. Next, the network of brain regions functionally connected to each FTD patient's location of atrophy was determined using seed-based functional connectivity in a large (n = 1000) normative connectome. Finally, we used atrophy network mapping to define clinical subtype-specific network (45 bvFTD, 35 svPPA and 58 healthy controls in Dataset 1; 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA, 30 nfvPPA and 110 healthy controls in Dataset 2) and symptom-specific networks [combined Datasets 1 and 2, apathy without depression versus non-apathy without depression (80:26), disinhibition versus non-disinhibition (88:68)]. We compare the result with matched symptom networks derived from patients with focal brain lesions or conjunction analysis. Through the analysis of two datasets, we identified heterogeneity in atrophy patterns among FTD patients. However, these atrophy patterns are connected to a common brain network. The primary regions affected by atrophy in FTD included the frontal and temporal lobes, particularly the anterior temporal lobe. bvFTD connects to frontal and temporal cortical areas, svPPA mainly impacts the anterior temporal region and nfvPPA targets the inferior frontal gyrus and precentral cortex regions. The apathy-specific network was localized in the orbital frontal cortex and ventral striatum, while the disinhibition-specific network was localized in the bilateral orbital frontal gyrus and right temporal lobe. Apathy and disinhibition atrophy networks resemble known motivational and criminal lesion networks, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the apathy/disinhibition scores and functional connectivity between atrophy maps and the peak of the networks. This study localizes the common network of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in FTD, guiding future FTD neuromodulation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atrophy network mapping of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in frontotemporal dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Min Chu, Deming Jiang, Dan Li, Shaozhen Yan, Li Liu, Haitian Nan, Yingtao Wang, Yihao Wang, Ailing Yue, Liankun Ren, Kewei Chen, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Jie Lu, Liyong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/brain/awae067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a disease of high heterogeneity, apathy and disinhibition present in all subtypes of FTD and imposes a significant burden on families/society. Traditional neuroimaging analysis has limitations in elucidating the network localization due to individual clinical and neuroanatomical variability. The study aims to identify the atrophy network map associated with different FTD clinical subtypes and determine the specific localization of the network for apathy and disinhibition. Eighty FTD patients [45 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and 35 semantic variant progressive primary aphasia (svPPA)] and 58 healthy controls at Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled as Dataset 1; 112 FTD patients including 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA and 30 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) cases, and 110 healthy controls from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI) dataset were included as Dataset 2. Initially, single-subject atrophy maps were defined by comparing cortical thickness in each FTD patient versus healthy controls. Next, the network of brain regions functionally connected to each FTD patient's location of atrophy was determined using seed-based functional connectivity in a large (n = 1000) normative connectome. Finally, we used atrophy network mapping to define clinical subtype-specific network (45 bvFTD, 35 svPPA and 58 healthy controls in Dataset 1; 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA, 30 nfvPPA and 110 healthy controls in Dataset 2) and symptom-specific networks [combined Datasets 1 and 2, apathy without depression versus non-apathy without depression (80:26), disinhibition versus non-disinhibition (88:68)]. We compare the result with matched symptom networks derived from patients with focal brain lesions or conjunction analysis. Through the analysis of two datasets, we identified heterogeneity in atrophy patterns among FTD patients. However, these atrophy patterns are connected to a common brain network. The primary regions affected by atrophy in FTD included the frontal and temporal lobes, particularly the anterior temporal lobe. bvFTD connects to frontal and temporal cortical areas, svPPA mainly impacts the anterior temporal region and nfvPPA targets the inferior frontal gyrus and precentral cortex regions. The apathy-specific network was localized in the orbital frontal cortex and ventral striatum, while the disinhibition-specific network was localized in the bilateral orbital frontal gyrus and right temporal lobe. Apathy and disinhibition atrophy networks resemble known motivational and criminal lesion networks, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the apathy/disinhibition scores and functional connectivity between atrophy maps and the peak of the networks. This study localizes the common network of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in FTD, guiding future FTD neuromodulation interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

额颞叶痴呆症(FTD)是一种异质性很高的疾病,所有亚型的 FTD 都会出现冷漠和抑制,给家庭/社会带来沉重负担。由于个体临床和神经解剖的差异性,传统的神经影像分析在阐明网络定位方面存在局限性。本研究旨在确定与不同 FTD 临床亚型相关的萎缩网络图,并确定冷漠和抑制网络的具体定位。研究以宣武医院的80例FTD患者(45例行为变异型FTD(bvFTD)和35例语义变异型进行性原发性失语(svPPA))和58例健康对照(HCs)为数据集1;以前额颞叶变性神经影像学倡议(FTLDNI)数据集的112例FTD患者(包括50例bvFTD、32例svPPA和30例非流利变异型PPA(nfvPPA))和110例HCs为数据集2。首先,通过比较每位 FTD 患者与 HCs 的皮质厚度来定义单受试者萎缩图。接下来,我们在一个大型(n = 1000)常模连接组中使用基于种子的功能连接来确定与每位 FTD 患者萎缩位置有功能连接的脑区网络。最后,我们利用萎缩网络映射确定了临床亚型特异性网络(数据集 1 中有 45 例 bvFTD、35 例 svPPA 和 58 例 HC;数据集 2 中有 50 例 bvFTD、32 例 svPPA、30 例 nfvPPA 和 110 例 HC)和症状特异性网络 [数据集 1 和 2 的组合,无抑郁的淡漠与无抑郁的非淡漠(80:26),抑制与非抑制(88:68)]。我们将这一结果与来自脑部病灶患者的匹配症状网络或联合分析结果进行了比较。通过对两个数据集的分析,我们发现了 FTD 患者萎缩模式的异质性。然而,这些萎缩模式与一个共同的大脑网络相连。bvFTD与额叶和颞叶皮质区域相连,svPPA主要影响颞叶前部区域,而nfvPPA则以额叶下回和前中央皮质区域为目标。冷漠特异性网络定位于眶额皮层和腹侧纹状体,而抑制特异性网络定位于双侧眶额回和右侧颞叶。冷漠和抑制失调萎缩网络分别与已知的动机和犯罪病变网络相似。研究发现,冷漠/抑制评分与萎缩图之间的功能连接和网络峰值之间存在明显的相关性。这项研究定位了FTD临床亚型和主要症状的共同网络,为未来的FTD神经调节干预提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Atrophy network mapping of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in frontotemporal dementia.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a disease of high heterogeneity, apathy and disinhibition present in all subtypes of FTD and imposes a significant burden on families/society. Traditional neuroimaging analysis has limitations in elucidating the network localization due to individual clinical and neuroanatomical variability. The study aims to identify the atrophy network map associated with different FTD clinical subtypes and determine the specific localization of the network for apathy and disinhibition. Eighty FTD patients [45 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and 35 semantic variant progressive primary aphasia (svPPA)] and 58 healthy controls at Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled as Dataset 1; 112 FTD patients including 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA and 30 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) cases, and 110 healthy controls from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI) dataset were included as Dataset 2. Initially, single-subject atrophy maps were defined by comparing cortical thickness in each FTD patient versus healthy controls. Next, the network of brain regions functionally connected to each FTD patient's location of atrophy was determined using seed-based functional connectivity in a large (n = 1000) normative connectome. Finally, we used atrophy network mapping to define clinical subtype-specific network (45 bvFTD, 35 svPPA and 58 healthy controls in Dataset 1; 50 bvFTD, 32 svPPA, 30 nfvPPA and 110 healthy controls in Dataset 2) and symptom-specific networks [combined Datasets 1 and 2, apathy without depression versus non-apathy without depression (80:26), disinhibition versus non-disinhibition (88:68)]. We compare the result with matched symptom networks derived from patients with focal brain lesions or conjunction analysis. Through the analysis of two datasets, we identified heterogeneity in atrophy patterns among FTD patients. However, these atrophy patterns are connected to a common brain network. The primary regions affected by atrophy in FTD included the frontal and temporal lobes, particularly the anterior temporal lobe. bvFTD connects to frontal and temporal cortical areas, svPPA mainly impacts the anterior temporal region and nfvPPA targets the inferior frontal gyrus and precentral cortex regions. The apathy-specific network was localized in the orbital frontal cortex and ventral striatum, while the disinhibition-specific network was localized in the bilateral orbital frontal gyrus and right temporal lobe. Apathy and disinhibition atrophy networks resemble known motivational and criminal lesion networks, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the apathy/disinhibition scores and functional connectivity between atrophy maps and the peak of the networks. This study localizes the common network of clinical subtypes and main symptoms in FTD, guiding future FTD neuromodulation interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Phase 2b program with sonlicromanol in patients with mitochondrial disease due to m.3243A>G mutation. Focal brain administration of antiseizure medications improves outcomes and reduces side effects. Tau, synapse loss and gliosis progress in an Alzheimer's mouse model after amyloid-β immunotherapy. Mental health disorders before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study. Smaller cingulate grey matter mediates the association between dual-task gait and incident dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1