肾脏科医生的意见和结构因素在透析方式选择中的作用。腹膜透析研究小组问卷调查结果。

Loris Neri, Giusto Viglino, Valerio Vizzardi, Silvia Porreca, Claudio Mastropaolo, Giancarlo Marinangeli, Gianfranca Cabiddu
{"title":"肾脏科医生的意见和结构因素在透析方式选择中的作用。腹膜透析研究小组问卷调查结果。","authors":"Loris Neri, Giusto Viglino, Valerio Vizzardi, Silvia Porreca, Claudio Mastropaolo, Giancarlo Marinangeli, Gianfranca Cabiddu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The use of PD depends on economic, structural and organizational factors. The nephrologist's opinion is that peritoneal dialysis is less used than it shold be. In Italy, PD is not carried out in private Centers, but neither is it in around one third of Public Centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of nephrologists on PD in Public Centers only, thereby nullifying the influence of the economic factors. <b>Materials and Methods.</b> The investigation was carried out by means of an online questionnaire (Qs) via mail, and during meetings and Congresses in 2006-07. The Qs investigated the characteristics of the Centers, the nephrologists interviewed, and opinions on the various aspects of the choice of Renal Replacement Therapy Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) (26 questions). Responses were received from 454 nephrologists in 270 public Centers. Among these, 205 centers (370 Qs) report PD (PD-YES), 36 (42 Qs) do not (PD-NO) and 29 (42 Qs) do not use it but send patients selected for PD to other Centers (PD-TRANSF). <b>Results.</b> The PD-NO and PD-TRANSF Centers are significantly smaller, with greater availability of beds. In the PD-YES Centers the presence of a pre-dialysis pathway, early referral and nurses dedicated solely to PD are associated with a higher use of PD. The nephrologists in the PD-NO Centers rate PD more negatively in terms of both clinical and non-clinical factors. The belief that more than 40% of patients can do either PD or HD differs among the nephrologists in the PD-YES (74.3%), PD-TRANSF (45.2%) and PD-NO (28.6%) Centers. Likewise, the belief that PD can be used as a first treatment in more than 30% of cases differs among the nephrologists in PD-YES (49.2%), PD-TRANSF (33.3%) and PD-NO (14.3%) Centers. <b>Conclusions.</b> The use of PD in Public Centers is conditioned by both structural and organizational factors, and by the opinions of nephrologists on the use and effectiveness of the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":12553,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of the Opinions of the Nephrologist and Structural Factors in Dialysis Modality Selection. Results of a Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Loris Neri, Giusto Viglino, Valerio Vizzardi, Silvia Porreca, Claudio Mastropaolo, Giancarlo Marinangeli, Gianfranca Cabiddu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The use of PD depends on economic, structural and organizational factors. The nephrologist's opinion is that peritoneal dialysis is less used than it shold be. In Italy, PD is not carried out in private Centers, but neither is it in around one third of Public Centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of nephrologists on PD in Public Centers only, thereby nullifying the influence of the economic factors. <b>Materials and Methods.</b> The investigation was carried out by means of an online questionnaire (Qs) via mail, and during meetings and Congresses in 2006-07. The Qs investigated the characteristics of the Centers, the nephrologists interviewed, and opinions on the various aspects of the choice of Renal Replacement Therapy Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) (26 questions). Responses were received from 454 nephrologists in 270 public Centers. Among these, 205 centers (370 Qs) report PD (PD-YES), 36 (42 Qs) do not (PD-NO) and 29 (42 Qs) do not use it but send patients selected for PD to other Centers (PD-TRANSF). <b>Results.</b> The PD-NO and PD-TRANSF Centers are significantly smaller, with greater availability of beds. In the PD-YES Centers the presence of a pre-dialysis pathway, early referral and nurses dedicated solely to PD are associated with a higher use of PD. The nephrologists in the PD-NO Centers rate PD more negatively in terms of both clinical and non-clinical factors. The belief that more than 40% of patients can do either PD or HD differs among the nephrologists in the PD-YES (74.3%), PD-TRANSF (45.2%) and PD-NO (28.6%) Centers. Likewise, the belief that PD can be used as a first treatment in more than 30% of cases differs among the nephrologists in PD-YES (49.2%), PD-TRANSF (33.3%) and PD-NO (14.3%) Centers. <b>Conclusions.</b> The use of PD in Public Centers is conditioned by both structural and organizational factors, and by the opinions of nephrologists on the use and effectiveness of the technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。腹膜透析的使用取决于经济、结构和组织因素。肾病专家认为,腹膜透析的使用率低于其应有的水平。在意大利,腹膜透析不在私人中心进行,但也不在约三分之一的公立中心进行。本研究旨在调查肾病专家对公立中心腹膜透析的看法,从而排除经济因素的影响。材料和方法。调查是通过邮件在线问卷(Qs)以及在 2006-07 年的会议和大会期间进行的。问卷调查了各中心的特点、受访肾科医生以及对选择肾脏替代疗法(RRT)各方面的意见(26 个问题)。270 个公共中心的 454 名肾病学家提供了答复。其中,205 个中心(370 个问题)报告使用肾脏替代疗法(PD-YES),36 个中心(42 个问题)不使用肾脏替代疗法(PD-NO),29 个中心(42 个问题)不使用肾脏替代疗法,但将选择肾脏替代疗法的患者送往其他中心(PD-TRANSF)。结果。PD-NO 和 PD-TRANSF 中心的规模明显更小,床位更充足。在 PD-YES 中心,透析前路径、早期转诊和专门负责透析的护士的存在与透析使用率较高有关。就临床和非临床因素而言,PD-NO 中心的肾病专家对透析的评价更为负面。PD-YES(74.3%)、PD-TRANSF(45.2%)和 PD-NO(28.6%)中心的肾科医师对 40% 以上的患者可以进行腹膜透析或 HD 的看法各不相同。同样,PD-YES(49.2%)、PD-TRANSF(33.3%)和 PD-NO(14.3%)中心的肾病学家认为 30% 以上的病例可将 PD 用作首次治疗的比例也不同。结论公立中心使用 PD 的情况受结构和组织因素以及肾病专家对该技术的使用和有效性的看法的制约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of the Opinions of the Nephrologist and Structural Factors in Dialysis Modality Selection. Results of a Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group Questionnaire.

Background. The use of PD depends on economic, structural and organizational factors. The nephrologist's opinion is that peritoneal dialysis is less used than it shold be. In Italy, PD is not carried out in private Centers, but neither is it in around one third of Public Centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of nephrologists on PD in Public Centers only, thereby nullifying the influence of the economic factors. Materials and Methods. The investigation was carried out by means of an online questionnaire (Qs) via mail, and during meetings and Congresses in 2006-07. The Qs investigated the characteristics of the Centers, the nephrologists interviewed, and opinions on the various aspects of the choice of Renal Replacement Therapy Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) (26 questions). Responses were received from 454 nephrologists in 270 public Centers. Among these, 205 centers (370 Qs) report PD (PD-YES), 36 (42 Qs) do not (PD-NO) and 29 (42 Qs) do not use it but send patients selected for PD to other Centers (PD-TRANSF). Results. The PD-NO and PD-TRANSF Centers are significantly smaller, with greater availability of beds. In the PD-YES Centers the presence of a pre-dialysis pathway, early referral and nurses dedicated solely to PD are associated with a higher use of PD. The nephrologists in the PD-NO Centers rate PD more negatively in terms of both clinical and non-clinical factors. The belief that more than 40% of patients can do either PD or HD differs among the nephrologists in the PD-YES (74.3%), PD-TRANSF (45.2%) and PD-NO (28.6%) Centers. Likewise, the belief that PD can be used as a first treatment in more than 30% of cases differs among the nephrologists in PD-YES (49.2%), PD-TRANSF (33.3%) and PD-NO (14.3%) Centers. Conclusions. The use of PD in Public Centers is conditioned by both structural and organizational factors, and by the opinions of nephrologists on the use and effectiveness of the technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Il Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia (GIN) è la rivista di educazione continua della Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN ed è pubblicato bimestralmente. E" il più autorevole organo di informazione nefrologia disponibile a livello nazionale. Il giornale Italiano di Nefrologia offre la più aggiornata informazione medico-scientifica rivolta al nefrologo sotto forma di rassegne, casi clinici e articoli finalizzati all’Educazione Continua in Medicina, oltre ai notiziari ed agli atti dei congressi di questa prestigiosa Società Scientifica
期刊最新文献
[ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis Following SARS-CoV2 Infection: A Case Report]. [Governo clinico in nefrologia: organizzazione e sviluppo della dialisi peritoneale]. [Hypotension and Generalized Edema Due to Plasma Leakage: A Case Report]. [Reactive Perforating Collagenosis in Hemodialysis Patients]. [Survey and Intervention Tools for Burnout in Dialysis Healthcare Staff].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1