评估用于改善视觉功能的新型虚拟现实系统的安全性和接受度的试点研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2024.2324074
Luis Leal-Vega, David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Carlos J Hernández-Rodríguez, Rubén Cuadrado-Asensio, Adrián Martín-Gutiérrez, Juan Francisco Arenillas Lara, María Begoña Coco Martín
{"title":"评估用于改善视觉功能的新型虚拟现实系统的安全性和接受度的试点研究。","authors":"Luis Leal-Vega, David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Carlos J Hernández-Rodríguez, Rubén Cuadrado-Asensio, Adrián Martín-Gutiérrez, Juan Francisco Arenillas Lara, María Begoña Coco Martín","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2324074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of the clinical use of a novel Virtual Reality (VR) training software designed to be used for active vision therapy in amblyopic patients by determining its preliminary safety and acceptance on the visual function of healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilot study enrolling 10 individuals (3 men, 7 women, mean age: 31.8 ± 6.5 years) with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ .90 (decimal) in both eyes were evaluated before and after 20 minutes of exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system using the HTC Vive Pro Eye head mounted display. Visual function assessment included near (40 cm) and distance (6 m) cover test (CT), stereopsis, binocular accommodative facility (BAF), near point of convergence (NPC), near point of accommodation (NPA), accommodative-convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio and positive and negative fusional vergences. Safety was assessed using the VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) and acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model ;(TAM). Changes in all these variables after VR exposure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short-term exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system only induced statistically significant changes in distance phoria (<i>p</i> = .016), but these changes were not clinically relevant. No significant changes were observed in VRSQ oculo-motricity and disorientation scores after exposure (<i>p</i> = .197 and .317, respectively). TAM scores showed a good acceptance of the system in terms of perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use, although some concerns were raised in relation to the intention-to-use domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system does not seem to adversely affect the visual function in healthy adults and its safety and acceptance profile seems to be adequate for supporting its potential use in other populations, such as amblyopic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"394-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Study Assessing the Safety and Acceptance of a Novel Virtual Reality System to Improve Visual Function.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Leal-Vega, David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Carlos J Hernández-Rodríguez, Rubén Cuadrado-Asensio, Adrián Martín-Gutiérrez, Juan Francisco Arenillas Lara, María Begoña Coco Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2324074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of the clinical use of a novel Virtual Reality (VR) training software designed to be used for active vision therapy in amblyopic patients by determining its preliminary safety and acceptance on the visual function of healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilot study enrolling 10 individuals (3 men, 7 women, mean age: 31.8 ± 6.5 years) with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ .90 (decimal) in both eyes were evaluated before and after 20 minutes of exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system using the HTC Vive Pro Eye head mounted display. Visual function assessment included near (40 cm) and distance (6 m) cover test (CT), stereopsis, binocular accommodative facility (BAF), near point of convergence (NPC), near point of accommodation (NPA), accommodative-convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio and positive and negative fusional vergences. Safety was assessed using the VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) and acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model ;(TAM). Changes in all these variables after VR exposure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short-term exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system only induced statistically significant changes in distance phoria (<i>p</i> = .016), but these changes were not clinically relevant. No significant changes were observed in VRSQ oculo-motricity and disorientation scores after exposure (<i>p</i> = .197 and .317, respectively). TAM scores showed a good acceptance of the system in terms of perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use, although some concerns were raised in relation to the intention-to-use domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system does not seem to adversely affect the visual function in healthy adults and its safety and acceptance profile seems to be adequate for supporting its potential use in other populations, such as amblyopic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"394-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2324074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2324074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估新型虚拟现实(VR)训练软件用于弱视患者主动视力治疗的临床应用可行性,确定其对健康成年人视觉功能的初步安全性和接受度:试点研究招募了 10 名双眼最佳矫正视力 (BCVA) 均≥ 0.90(十进制)的患者(3 名男性,7 名女性,平均年龄:31.8 ± 6.5 岁),在使用 HTC Vive Pro Eye 头戴式显示器接触 NEIVATECH VR 系统 20 分钟前后进行评估。视觉功能评估包括近距离(40 厘米)和远距离(6 米)遮盖测试(CT)、立体视、双眼容纳设施(BAF)、近辐辏点(NPC)、近调节点(NPA)、容纳-辐辏大于调节(AC/A)比率以及正负融合眩晕。安全性采用 VR 晕眩问卷(VRSQ)进行评估,接受度采用技术接受模型(TAM)进行评估。对所有这些变量在接触 VR 后的变化进行了分析:结果:短期暴露于 NEIVATECH VR 系统仅在距离幻觉方面引起了统计学意义上的显著变化(p = .016),但这些变化与临床无关。暴露后,VRSQ 的眼球运动性和迷失方向评分没有明显变化(p = .197 和 .317)。TAM评分显示,在感知乐趣和感知易用性方面,受试者对该系统的接受度较高,但在使用意向方面存在一些问题:结论:接触 NEIVATECH VR 系统似乎不会对健康成年人的视觉功能产生不利影响,其安全性和接受度似乎足以支持其在弱视患者等其他人群中的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot Study Assessing the Safety and Acceptance of a Novel Virtual Reality System to Improve Visual Function.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of the clinical use of a novel Virtual Reality (VR) training software designed to be used for active vision therapy in amblyopic patients by determining its preliminary safety and acceptance on the visual function of healthy adults.

Methods: Pilot study enrolling 10 individuals (3 men, 7 women, mean age: 31.8 ± 6.5 years) with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ .90 (decimal) in both eyes were evaluated before and after 20 minutes of exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system using the HTC Vive Pro Eye head mounted display. Visual function assessment included near (40 cm) and distance (6 m) cover test (CT), stereopsis, binocular accommodative facility (BAF), near point of convergence (NPC), near point of accommodation (NPA), accommodative-convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio and positive and negative fusional vergences. Safety was assessed using the VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) and acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model ;(TAM). Changes in all these variables after VR exposure were analyzed.

Results: Short-term exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system only induced statistically significant changes in distance phoria (p = .016), but these changes were not clinically relevant. No significant changes were observed in VRSQ oculo-motricity and disorientation scores after exposure (p = .197 and .317, respectively). TAM scores showed a good acceptance of the system in terms of perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use, although some concerns were raised in relation to the intention-to-use domain.

Conclusion: Exposure to the NEIVATECH VR system does not seem to adversely affect the visual function in healthy adults and its safety and acceptance profile seems to be adequate for supporting its potential use in other populations, such as amblyopic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
期刊最新文献
Susac Syndrome: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management with an Emphasis on Ophthalmic Involvement. Tear Film and Dry Eye Characteristics as Predictors of Photophobia in 374 Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Risk Factors for Eye and Orbital Injuries Related to Electric Scooters and Off-Road Vehicles. Lacrimal History - Part VII: Doyens of Dacryology Series - The Contributions from the Anatomical School of Padua: Andreas Vesalius, Gabriele Falloppio, and Giovanni Battista Morgagni. Recent Progression of Pathogenesis and Treatment for Diabetic Cataracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1