运动想象和动作观察对慢性中风患者自律神经功能的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2322884
Humeyra Kiloatar, Aylin Aydogdu Delibay, Hasan Huseyin Gokpinar
{"title":"运动想象和动作观察对慢性中风患者自律神经功能的影响。","authors":"Humeyra Kiloatar, Aylin Aydogdu Delibay, Hasan Huseyin Gokpinar","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2322884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of motor imagery (MI), action observation (AO), and action execution (AE) interventions on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in individuals with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, randomized, case-control study. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to MI (<i>n</i> = 10), AO (<i>n</i> = 15), and the AE group (<i>n</i> = 11). Heart rate (HR)-based measurements (HR, heart rate variability (HRV)) and blood pressure were evaluated before the practice of each group. In the MI group, participants were instructed to imagine themselves walking at their own comfortable pace for 5 minutes. Meanwhile, in the AO group, participants were shown a video of a person walking for 5 minutes. Finally, in the AE group, participants were instructed to actually walk for 5 minutes. Then, all measurements were taken again.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in HR and mean RR interval within the AE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Root Mean Square of Successive Differences Between Normal Heartbeats (RMSSD) (ms) within the AO group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant difference in HR and mean RR intervals (ms) between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). According to post-hoc analyses, HR was statistically significantly higher in the AE group compared to the other groups, and the mean RR interval was statistically significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, in patients with chronic stroke, AE and AO may affect ANS by increasing sympathetic activation. It is recommended for future studies to evaluate whether patients actually engage in imagery during the MI task.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"713-722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of motor imagery and action observation on autonomic functions in patients with chronic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Humeyra Kiloatar, Aylin Aydogdu Delibay, Hasan Huseyin Gokpinar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2322884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of motor imagery (MI), action observation (AO), and action execution (AE) interventions on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in individuals with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, randomized, case-control study. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to MI (<i>n</i> = 10), AO (<i>n</i> = 15), and the AE group (<i>n</i> = 11). Heart rate (HR)-based measurements (HR, heart rate variability (HRV)) and blood pressure were evaluated before the practice of each group. In the MI group, participants were instructed to imagine themselves walking at their own comfortable pace for 5 minutes. Meanwhile, in the AO group, participants were shown a video of a person walking for 5 minutes. Finally, in the AE group, participants were instructed to actually walk for 5 minutes. Then, all measurements were taken again.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in HR and mean RR interval within the AE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Root Mean Square of Successive Differences Between Normal Heartbeats (RMSSD) (ms) within the AO group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant difference in HR and mean RR intervals (ms) between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). According to post-hoc analyses, HR was statistically significantly higher in the AE group compared to the other groups, and the mean RR interval was statistically significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, in patients with chronic stroke, AE and AO may affect ANS by increasing sympathetic activation. It is recommended for future studies to evaluate whether patients actually engage in imagery during the MI task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"713-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2322884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2322884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨运动想象(MI)、动作观察(AO)和动作执行(AE)干预对慢性中风患者自主神经系统(ANS)的影响:这是一项单中心、随机、病例对照研究。36名患者被随机分配到MI组(10人)、AO组(15人)和AE组(11人)。在每组练习前,对基于心率(HR)的测量(心率、心率变异性(HRV))和血压进行评估。在 MI 组,参与者被要求想象自己以自己舒适的速度行走 5 分钟。同时,在 AO 组中,参与者观看一个人行走 5 分钟的视频。最后,在 AE 组,参与者被要求实际行走 5 分钟。然后,再次进行所有测量:结果:在 AE 组中,心率和平均 RR 间期的差异具有统计学意义(P P P P P 结论:AE 组的心率和平均 RR 间期的差异具有统计学意义(P P P P总之,在慢性中风患者中,AE 和 AO 可能会通过增加交感神经激活来影响自律神经系统。建议在今后的研究中评估患者在完成 MI 任务时是否真的进行了想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of motor imagery and action observation on autonomic functions in patients with chronic stroke.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of motor imagery (MI), action observation (AO), and action execution (AE) interventions on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in individuals with chronic stroke.

Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, case-control study. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to MI (n = 10), AO (n = 15), and the AE group (n = 11). Heart rate (HR)-based measurements (HR, heart rate variability (HRV)) and blood pressure were evaluated before the practice of each group. In the MI group, participants were instructed to imagine themselves walking at their own comfortable pace for 5 minutes. Meanwhile, in the AO group, participants were shown a video of a person walking for 5 minutes. Finally, in the AE group, participants were instructed to actually walk for 5 minutes. Then, all measurements were taken again.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found in HR and mean RR interval within the AE group (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Root Mean Square of Successive Differences Between Normal Heartbeats (RMSSD) (ms) within the AO group (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in HR and mean RR intervals (ms) between groups (p < 0.05). According to post-hoc analyses, HR was statistically significantly higher in the AE group compared to the other groups, and the mean RR interval was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In conclusion, in patients with chronic stroke, AE and AO may affect ANS by increasing sympathetic activation. It is recommended for future studies to evaluate whether patients actually engage in imagery during the MI task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Lateropulsion resolution and outcomes up to one year post-stroke: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. The effects of kinesiophobia, fatigue, and quality of life on physical activity in patients with stroke. Cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue three months after first-ever ischemic stroke. Turkish cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the stroke activity scale in individuals with Hemiparesis. Defining tibial anterior muscle morphology in first-ever chronic stroke patients using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1