前瞻性评估患者报告的焦虑以及在磁共振成像仪上接受适应性放射治疗的体验

Amanda Moreira , Winnie Li , Alejandro Berlin , Cathy Carpino-Rocca , Peter Chung , Leigh Conroy , Jennifer Dang , Laura A. Dawson , Rachel M. Glicksman , Ali Hosni , Harald Keller , Vickie Kong , Patricia Lindsay , Andrea Shessel , Teo Stanescu , Edward Taylor , Jeff Winter , Michael Yan , Daniel Letourneau , Michael Milosevic , Michael Velec
{"title":"前瞻性评估患者报告的焦虑以及在磁共振成像仪上接受适应性放射治疗的体验","authors":"Amanda Moreira ,&nbsp;Winnie Li ,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin ,&nbsp;Cathy Carpino-Rocca ,&nbsp;Peter Chung ,&nbsp;Leigh Conroy ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dang ,&nbsp;Laura A. Dawson ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Glicksman ,&nbsp;Ali Hosni ,&nbsp;Harald Keller ,&nbsp;Vickie Kong ,&nbsp;Patricia Lindsay ,&nbsp;Andrea Shessel ,&nbsp;Teo Stanescu ,&nbsp;Edward Taylor ,&nbsp;Jeff Winter ,&nbsp;Michael Yan ,&nbsp;Daniel Letourneau ,&nbsp;Michael Milosevic ,&nbsp;Michael Velec","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as “not at all” (87%), “somewhat” (11%), “moderately” (1%) and “very much so” (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96–100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78–85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000076/pdfft?md5=1efb64100727ab207b0664f1ebdc0113&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Moreira ,&nbsp;Winnie Li ,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin ,&nbsp;Cathy Carpino-Rocca ,&nbsp;Peter Chung ,&nbsp;Leigh Conroy ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dang ,&nbsp;Laura A. Dawson ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Glicksman ,&nbsp;Ali Hosni ,&nbsp;Harald Keller ,&nbsp;Vickie Kong ,&nbsp;Patricia Lindsay ,&nbsp;Andrea Shessel ,&nbsp;Teo Stanescu ,&nbsp;Edward Taylor ,&nbsp;Jeff Winter ,&nbsp;Michael Yan ,&nbsp;Daniel Letourneau ,&nbsp;Michael Milosevic ,&nbsp;Michael Velec\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as “not at all” (87%), “somewhat” (11%), “moderately” (1%) and “very much so” (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96–100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78–85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000076/pdfft?md5=1efb64100727ab207b0664f1ebdc0113&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000076-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过每日在线自适应放射治疗(ART)实现了磁共振扫描仪和直线加速器(MR-linac)的一体化。本研究评估了患者对医院整体护理以及在磁共振线性加速器环境中接受治疗的体验报告。方法预先筛选出符合磁共振条件和患有幽闭恐惧症的患者,将其转介到 1.5 T 磁共振线性加速器上进行模拟治疗。患者报告的体验测量采用两种经过验证的调查方法。首次治疗后立即进行 15 项 MR 焦虑问卷 (MR-AQ),以评估与 MR 相关的焦虑和放松程度。在最后一次治疗后立即进行 40 项癌症护理满意度问卷调查,对医生、放射治疗师、服务和护理机构及其门诊体验进行评分,采用五点 Likert 式回答。结果205名患者被纳入分析范围。对骨盆和腹部的多个部位进行了治疗,每次治疗的中位时间分别为 46 分钟和 66 分钟。患者对 MR 相关焦虑的评价为 "完全不焦虑"(87%)、"有点焦虑"(11%)、"一般焦虑"(1%)和 "非常焦虑"(1%)。所有项目的正面满意度从 78% 到 100% 不等(中位数为 93%)。所有辐射治疗师特定项目的正面满意度均为 96%-100%。评分最低的五个项目(范围为 78-85%)与信息提供、协调和沟通的一般情况有关。在这一大型单一机构前瞻性队列中,尽管使用 MR-linac 进行了长时间的 ART 治疗,但所有患者与 MR 相关的焦虑程度都很低,并按计划完成了治疗。总体而言,患者对使用 MR-linac 进行抗逆转录病毒疗法的癌症治疗非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac

Purpose

An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment.

Methods

Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as “not at all” (87%), “somewhat” (11%), “moderately” (1%) and “very much so” (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96–100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78–85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%.

Conclusion

In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Treatment efficiency and quality improvement via double imaging modality (DIM) versus single imaging modality (SIM) image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer Patient experience preparing for prostate cancer radiotherapy Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy Pan-Canadian assessment of image guided adaptive radiation therapy and the role of the radiation therapist Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of CTV contour adaptations by radiation therapists for adaptive prostate radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MR-Linac
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1