创造权威与自主:公共部门项目管理中必要的辩证紧张关系

Kevan M. Rowe , Stephen Jonathan Whitty , Bronte van der Hoorn
{"title":"创造权威与自主:公共部门项目管理中必要的辩证紧张关系","authors":"Kevan M. Rowe ,&nbsp;Stephen Jonathan Whitty ,&nbsp;Bronte van der Hoorn","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the nuanced relationship between public sector project managers and their adherence to organizational project management protocols, as defined by reference documents such as PRINCE2 and PMBOK® Guide. It investigates why these project managers frequently deviate from these protocols. The study investigates the practical relevance yet perceived redundancy of these documents through interviews and a focus group with nine experienced project managers in the Australian public sector. Using thematic analysis and a Derridean perspective, we show how these documents create a project manager's their authority and autonomy. The study concludes with the proposal of a deconstructive theory of public sector project management, emphasising pragmatism over rigid adherence to established project management ideologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000048/pdfft?md5=7d731313e766cf61ee7b1dc67be882c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating authority and autonomy: Necessary dialectical tensions in public sector project management\",\"authors\":\"Kevan M. Rowe ,&nbsp;Stephen Jonathan Whitty ,&nbsp;Bronte van der Hoorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the nuanced relationship between public sector project managers and their adherence to organizational project management protocols, as defined by reference documents such as PRINCE2 and PMBOK® Guide. It investigates why these project managers frequently deviate from these protocols. The study investigates the practical relevance yet perceived redundancy of these documents through interviews and a focus group with nine experienced project managers in the Australian public sector. Using thematic analysis and a Derridean perspective, we show how these documents create a project manager's their authority and autonomy. The study concludes with the proposal of a deconstructive theory of public sector project management, emphasising pragmatism over rigid adherence to established project management ideologies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000048/pdfft?md5=7d731313e766cf61ee7b1dc67be882c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000048-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了公共部门项目经理与他们遵守 PRINCE2 和 PMBOK® Guide 等参考文件规定的组织项目管理规程之间的微妙关系。研究还探讨了这些项目经理经常偏离这些规程的原因。本研究通过与澳大利亚公共部门的九位经验丰富的项目经理进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,探讨了这些文件的实际意义和冗余感。通过主题分析和德里达观点,我们展示了这些文件是如何创建项目经理的权威和自主权的。研究最后提出了公共部门项目管理的解构理论,强调实用主义,而不是死守既定的项目管理意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating authority and autonomy: Necessary dialectical tensions in public sector project management

This study investigates the nuanced relationship between public sector project managers and their adherence to organizational project management protocols, as defined by reference documents such as PRINCE2 and PMBOK® Guide. It investigates why these project managers frequently deviate from these protocols. The study investigates the practical relevance yet perceived redundancy of these documents through interviews and a focus group with nine experienced project managers in the Australian public sector. Using thematic analysis and a Derridean perspective, we show how these documents create a project manager's their authority and autonomy. The study concludes with the proposal of a deconstructive theory of public sector project management, emphasising pragmatism over rigid adherence to established project management ideologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Authoritarian leadership in projects: An integrated model to understand the team members’ task and innovative performance Overlooked and underused? The benefits and challenges of using causal mapping for project studies How does building information modeling influence decision-making process in the project design? An input, process and output analysis Space in project organising: Insights from planning within and between construction projects Governmentality in construction claim management: Role of smart data initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1