毁灭以取代:定居者对土著人民的种族灭绝》,作者 Mohamed Adhikari(评论)

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of World History Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1353/jwh.2024.a920678
Mark Meuwese
{"title":"毁灭以取代:定居者对土著人民的种族灭绝》,作者 Mohamed Adhikari(评论)","authors":"Mark Meuwese","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2024.a920678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples</em> by Mohamed Adhikari <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Mark Meuwese </li> </ul> <em>Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples</em>. By <small>mohamed adhikari</small>. Critical Themes in World History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2022. xliv + 179 pp. ISBN 978-1-64792-049-4. $18.00 (paper). <p>Mohamed Adhikari rightly points out that settler genocides are often overlooked in comparison to the wider known mass-killings of the Holocaust and the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. This book examines four settler genocides in the context of Western expansion across the world from approximately 1400 until the early twentieth century. The cases include the genocide of the Canary Islanders in the fifteenth century, the genocide of California’s Indigenous peoples during the Gold Rush from 1848 to 1870, the destruction of Aboriginal societies in Queensland in Australia during the second half of the nineteenth century, and the genocide of the Hereros of Southwestern Africa in the early twentieth century. The author has previously published on the genocide of the San people of South Africa. <em>Destroying to Replace</em>, part of a series aimed at undergraduate students, contains a preface, a series editor’s foreword, an introduction, a detailed examination of the four case studies, and a conclusion highlighting several themes common to each case study. Each chapter of the four cases ends with a selection of primary sources to encourage discussion.</p> <p>The introduction contains a succinct overview of the concepts of genocide and settler colonialism. The author emphasizes the influential role of the Polish-Jewish legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in developing the concept while in exile in the United States during the Second <strong>[End Page 172]</strong> World War. As part of negotiations at the United Nations (UN), Lemkin’s original expansive definition was revised as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide by the international body in December 1948. Although many scholars have used the UN definition, Adhikari argues that it is useful in international law but not in academia. The author settles on his own, which is the “intentional physical destruction of a social group or the intentional annihilation of such a significant part of the social relationships that constitute its communal life, that it is no longer able to reproduce itself biologically or culturally” (p. xxxii). Next, Adhikari discusses settler colonialism. Unlike resource exploitation colonies where violence committed against the Indigenous populations is relatively limited, Adhikari argues that in settler colonies, “where the expropriation of Indigenous land is central to the colonial project, violence is likely to be more intense” (pp. xxxiv–xxxv). Like scholars such as Lorenzo Veracini and Patrick Wolfe, Adhikari characterizes settler colonialism as a zero sum game in which settlers refuse to compromise with the Indigenous peoples because the latter need to make way for the settlers. At the same time, Adhikari views settler colonialism not as inherently genocidal. According to the author, forced removals, residential schools, and reserves are by themselves not evidence of genocide. Although Indigenous peoples were invariably faced with dispossession, removal, and assimilationist policies, not all were the subject of a focused campaign of exterminatory violence.</p> <p>Adhikari’s conceptual and comparative approach has several strengths. The four case studies that he examines are unequivocally examples of settler genocides. In all cases, settlers perpetrated sustained campaigns of physical violence against the Indigenous peoples resulting in their near complete destruction. This was especially the case for the little known Canary Islanders who faced relentless campaigns of Normandy and Spanish knights, soldiers, and settlers during the fifteenth century. The Spanish either killed or enslaved the Indigenous islanders as a workforce on the sugar mills of Madeira and the Canary Islands. By the early sixteenth century, no autonomous Indigenous communities were left on the islands. The Indigenous populations of California and Queensland suffered similar catastrophes during the nineteenth century as large numbers of aggressive settlers took over their homelands. Another strength of the book is that it clearly shows how commercial motives drove the taking of Indigenous lands as well as the large-scale enslavement of Indigenous populations, including women and children. Another common factor that Adhikari highlights well is how Indigenous resistance escalated settler violence. Whenever <strong>[End Page 173]</strong> Indigenous peoples put up...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples by Mohamed Adhikari (review)\",\"authors\":\"Mark Meuwese\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jwh.2024.a920678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples</em> by Mohamed Adhikari <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Mark Meuwese </li> </ul> <em>Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples</em>. By <small>mohamed adhikari</small>. Critical Themes in World History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2022. xliv + 179 pp. ISBN 978-1-64792-049-4. $18.00 (paper). <p>Mohamed Adhikari rightly points out that settler genocides are often overlooked in comparison to the wider known mass-killings of the Holocaust and the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. This book examines four settler genocides in the context of Western expansion across the world from approximately 1400 until the early twentieth century. The cases include the genocide of the Canary Islanders in the fifteenth century, the genocide of California’s Indigenous peoples during the Gold Rush from 1848 to 1870, the destruction of Aboriginal societies in Queensland in Australia during the second half of the nineteenth century, and the genocide of the Hereros of Southwestern Africa in the early twentieth century. The author has previously published on the genocide of the San people of South Africa. <em>Destroying to Replace</em>, part of a series aimed at undergraduate students, contains a preface, a series editor’s foreword, an introduction, a detailed examination of the four case studies, and a conclusion highlighting several themes common to each case study. Each chapter of the four cases ends with a selection of primary sources to encourage discussion.</p> <p>The introduction contains a succinct overview of the concepts of genocide and settler colonialism. The author emphasizes the influential role of the Polish-Jewish legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in developing the concept while in exile in the United States during the Second <strong>[End Page 172]</strong> World War. As part of negotiations at the United Nations (UN), Lemkin’s original expansive definition was revised as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide by the international body in December 1948. Although many scholars have used the UN definition, Adhikari argues that it is useful in international law but not in academia. The author settles on his own, which is the “intentional physical destruction of a social group or the intentional annihilation of such a significant part of the social relationships that constitute its communal life, that it is no longer able to reproduce itself biologically or culturally” (p. xxxii). Next, Adhikari discusses settler colonialism. Unlike resource exploitation colonies where violence committed against the Indigenous populations is relatively limited, Adhikari argues that in settler colonies, “where the expropriation of Indigenous land is central to the colonial project, violence is likely to be more intense” (pp. xxxiv–xxxv). Like scholars such as Lorenzo Veracini and Patrick Wolfe, Adhikari characterizes settler colonialism as a zero sum game in which settlers refuse to compromise with the Indigenous peoples because the latter need to make way for the settlers. At the same time, Adhikari views settler colonialism not as inherently genocidal. According to the author, forced removals, residential schools, and reserves are by themselves not evidence of genocide. Although Indigenous peoples were invariably faced with dispossession, removal, and assimilationist policies, not all were the subject of a focused campaign of exterminatory violence.</p> <p>Adhikari’s conceptual and comparative approach has several strengths. The four case studies that he examines are unequivocally examples of settler genocides. In all cases, settlers perpetrated sustained campaigns of physical violence against the Indigenous peoples resulting in their near complete destruction. This was especially the case for the little known Canary Islanders who faced relentless campaigns of Normandy and Spanish knights, soldiers, and settlers during the fifteenth century. The Spanish either killed or enslaved the Indigenous islanders as a workforce on the sugar mills of Madeira and the Canary Islands. By the early sixteenth century, no autonomous Indigenous communities were left on the islands. The Indigenous populations of California and Queensland suffered similar catastrophes during the nineteenth century as large numbers of aggressive settlers took over their homelands. Another strength of the book is that it clearly shows how commercial motives drove the taking of Indigenous lands as well as the large-scale enslavement of Indigenous populations, including women and children. Another common factor that Adhikari highlights well is how Indigenous resistance escalated settler violence. Whenever <strong>[End Page 173]</strong> Indigenous peoples put up...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World History\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2024.a920678\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2024.a920678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: Destroying to Replace:Mohamed Adhikari 著 Mark Meuwese 译 Destroying to Replace:定居者对土著人民的种族灭绝。作者:穆罕默德-阿迪卡里。世界历史的关键主题》。印第安纳波利斯:哈克特,2022 年。xliv + 179 pp.ISBN978-1-64792-049-4。18.00美元(纸质)。穆罕默德-阿迪卡里(Mohamed Adhikari)正确地指出,与众所周知的大屠杀和卢旺达图西族种族灭绝相比,定居者种族灭绝往往被忽视。本书从大约 1400 年至 20 世纪初西方在全球扩张的背景出发,研究了四起定居者种族灭绝事件。这些案例包括 15 世纪对加那利岛民的种族灭绝、1848 年至 1870 年淘金热期间对加利福尼亚土著人的种族灭绝、19 世纪下半叶对澳大利亚昆士兰原住民社会的破坏以及 20 世纪初对非洲西南部赫勒斯人的种族灭绝。作者曾出版过关于南非桑人种族灭绝的著作。毁灭以取代》是面向本科生的系列丛书之一,包含序言、系列丛书编辑前言、导言、对四个案例研究的详细审查,以及强调每个案例研究共同主题的结论。四个案例的每一章都以精选的原始资料结尾,以鼓励讨论。导言简明扼要地概述了种族灭绝和定居者殖民主义的概念。作者强调了波兰裔犹太法律学者拉斐尔-莱姆金在第二次 [完 第 172 页] 世界大战期间流亡美国期间在发展这一概念方面发挥的影响作用。作为联合国(UN)谈判的一部分,莱姆金最初提出的广义定义于 1948 年 12 月被该国际机构修订为《防止及惩治灭绝种族罪公约》。尽管许多学者都使用了联合国的定义,但阿迪卡里认为,该定义在国际法中有用,但在学术界并不适用。作者确定了自己的定义,即 "蓄意从肉体上摧毁一个社会群体,或蓄意消灭构成其社区生活的社会关系的重要部分,使其无法再从生物或文化上繁衍"(第 xxxii 页)。接下来,阿迪卡里讨论了定居者殖民主义。在资源开发殖民地,针对土著居民的暴力行为相对有限,但阿迪卡里认为,在定居者殖民地,"征用土著土地是殖民项目的核心,暴力行为可能会更加激烈"(第 xxxiv-xxxv 页)。与洛伦佐-维拉奇尼和帕特里克-沃尔夫等学者一样,阿迪卡里将定居者殖民主义描述为一种零和游戏,定居者拒绝与原住民妥协,因为原住民需要为定居者让路。同时,阿迪卡里认为定居者殖民主义本质上并非种族灭绝。作者认为,强制迁移、寄宿学校和保留地本身并不是种族灭绝的证据。虽然原住民无一例外地面临着剥夺财产、迁移和同化政策,但并非所有原住民都是灭绝性暴力集中运动的对象。阿迪卡里的概念和比较方法有几个优点。他所研究的四个案例都是定居者种族灭绝的明确例子。在所有案例中,定居者都对土著人实施了持续的肉体暴力,导致土著人几乎被彻底毁灭。鲜为人知的加那利岛民的情况尤其如此,他们在 15 世纪面对诺曼底和西班牙骑士、士兵和定居者的无情打击。西班牙人要么杀害土著岛民,要么奴役他们作为马德拉和加那利群岛糖厂的劳动力。到 16 世纪初,岛上已没有自治的土著社区。加利福尼亚和昆士兰的土著居民在 19 世纪也遭受了类似的灾难,因为大批侵略性的定居者占领了他们的家园。该书的另一个优点是,它清楚地表明了商业动机是如何推动掠夺土著土地以及大规模奴役土著居民(包括妇女和儿童)的。阿迪卡里很好地强调了另一个共同因素,即土著人的反抗如何使定居者的暴力升级。每当 [第 173 页完] 土著人民反抗时,他们就会......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples by Mohamed Adhikari (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples by Mohamed Adhikari
  • Mark Meuwese
Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples. By mohamed adhikari. Critical Themes in World History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2022. xliv + 179 pp. ISBN 978-1-64792-049-4. $18.00 (paper).

Mohamed Adhikari rightly points out that settler genocides are often overlooked in comparison to the wider known mass-killings of the Holocaust and the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. This book examines four settler genocides in the context of Western expansion across the world from approximately 1400 until the early twentieth century. The cases include the genocide of the Canary Islanders in the fifteenth century, the genocide of California’s Indigenous peoples during the Gold Rush from 1848 to 1870, the destruction of Aboriginal societies in Queensland in Australia during the second half of the nineteenth century, and the genocide of the Hereros of Southwestern Africa in the early twentieth century. The author has previously published on the genocide of the San people of South Africa. Destroying to Replace, part of a series aimed at undergraduate students, contains a preface, a series editor’s foreword, an introduction, a detailed examination of the four case studies, and a conclusion highlighting several themes common to each case study. Each chapter of the four cases ends with a selection of primary sources to encourage discussion.

The introduction contains a succinct overview of the concepts of genocide and settler colonialism. The author emphasizes the influential role of the Polish-Jewish legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in developing the concept while in exile in the United States during the Second [End Page 172] World War. As part of negotiations at the United Nations (UN), Lemkin’s original expansive definition was revised as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide by the international body in December 1948. Although many scholars have used the UN definition, Adhikari argues that it is useful in international law but not in academia. The author settles on his own, which is the “intentional physical destruction of a social group or the intentional annihilation of such a significant part of the social relationships that constitute its communal life, that it is no longer able to reproduce itself biologically or culturally” (p. xxxii). Next, Adhikari discusses settler colonialism. Unlike resource exploitation colonies where violence committed against the Indigenous populations is relatively limited, Adhikari argues that in settler colonies, “where the expropriation of Indigenous land is central to the colonial project, violence is likely to be more intense” (pp. xxxiv–xxxv). Like scholars such as Lorenzo Veracini and Patrick Wolfe, Adhikari characterizes settler colonialism as a zero sum game in which settlers refuse to compromise with the Indigenous peoples because the latter need to make way for the settlers. At the same time, Adhikari views settler colonialism not as inherently genocidal. According to the author, forced removals, residential schools, and reserves are by themselves not evidence of genocide. Although Indigenous peoples were invariably faced with dispossession, removal, and assimilationist policies, not all were the subject of a focused campaign of exterminatory violence.

Adhikari’s conceptual and comparative approach has several strengths. The four case studies that he examines are unequivocally examples of settler genocides. In all cases, settlers perpetrated sustained campaigns of physical violence against the Indigenous peoples resulting in their near complete destruction. This was especially the case for the little known Canary Islanders who faced relentless campaigns of Normandy and Spanish knights, soldiers, and settlers during the fifteenth century. The Spanish either killed or enslaved the Indigenous islanders as a workforce on the sugar mills of Madeira and the Canary Islands. By the early sixteenth century, no autonomous Indigenous communities were left on the islands. The Indigenous populations of California and Queensland suffered similar catastrophes during the nineteenth century as large numbers of aggressive settlers took over their homelands. Another strength of the book is that it clearly shows how commercial motives drove the taking of Indigenous lands as well as the large-scale enslavement of Indigenous populations, including women and children. Another common factor that Adhikari highlights well is how Indigenous resistance escalated settler violence. Whenever [End Page 173] Indigenous peoples put up...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.
期刊最新文献
Between World-Imagining and World-Making: Politics of Fin-de-Siècle Universalism and Transimperial Indo-U.S. Brotherhood Colonial City, Global Entanglements: Intra-and Trans-Imperial Networks in George Town, 1786–1937 Empire, Kinship and Violence: Family Histories, Indigenous Rights and the Making of Settler Colonialism, 1770–1842 by Elizabeth Elbourne (review) Many Black Women of this Fortress: Graça, Mónica, and Adwoa, Three Enslaved Women of Portugal's African Empire by Kwasi Konadu (review) Inter-Imperial Entanglement: The British Claim to Portuguese Delagoa Bay in the Nineteenth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1