使用超高性能混凝土墩铤加固钢筋混凝土桥墩,防止重型车辆碰撞:有限元分析研究

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1177/13694332241237575
Chunpeng Qu, Farhad Farzaneh, Sungmoon Jung, Qian Zhang
{"title":"使用超高性能混凝土墩铤加固钢筋混凝土桥墩,防止重型车辆碰撞:有限元分析研究","authors":"Chunpeng Qu, Farhad Farzaneh, Sungmoon Jung, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1177/13694332241237575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the effectiveness of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) collars in strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions through finite element (FE) analysis. First, validated FE models of UHPC and a heavy tractor-trailer were provided. Then, FE analyses were conducted to evaluate the strengthening performance of the UHPC collar. The effectiveness of UHPC collar was compared with conventional RC collar, and the effects of varying UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement were investigated. The results showed that the most severe damage observed on bridge piers due to heavy vehicle collisions primarily occurred below a height of approximately 2000 mm, manifested as diagonal shear cracks and plastic hinges. Therefore, the recommended minimum collar height is 2000 mm. The comparison between UHPC collar and RC collar strengthening demonstrated the superior effectiveness of UHPC collars. A 130-mm UHPC collar exhibited a similar strengthening effect as an 180-mm RC collar. Among the three investigated parameters of UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement, the study found that collar thickness had the most significant influence on the effectiveness of the UHPC collar in terms of damage pattern, energy absorption, and maximum deflection. While collar height primarily influenced deflection, a larger collar height was beneficial in reducing pier deflection at the end of the strengthened segment. Adding a small amount of collar reinforcement improved the performance of piers; however, this improvement was limited. The findings of this study address the lack of research on using UHPC for strengthening full-scale bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions and provide valuable references for future designs with similar applications.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening reinforced concrete bridge piers against heavy vehicle collisions with ultra-high performance concrete collars: A finite element analysis study\",\"authors\":\"Chunpeng Qu, Farhad Farzaneh, Sungmoon Jung, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13694332241237575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the effectiveness of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) collars in strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions through finite element (FE) analysis. First, validated FE models of UHPC and a heavy tractor-trailer were provided. Then, FE analyses were conducted to evaluate the strengthening performance of the UHPC collar. The effectiveness of UHPC collar was compared with conventional RC collar, and the effects of varying UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement were investigated. The results showed that the most severe damage observed on bridge piers due to heavy vehicle collisions primarily occurred below a height of approximately 2000 mm, manifested as diagonal shear cracks and plastic hinges. Therefore, the recommended minimum collar height is 2000 mm. The comparison between UHPC collar and RC collar strengthening demonstrated the superior effectiveness of UHPC collars. A 130-mm UHPC collar exhibited a similar strengthening effect as an 180-mm RC collar. Among the three investigated parameters of UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement, the study found that collar thickness had the most significant influence on the effectiveness of the UHPC collar in terms of damage pattern, energy absorption, and maximum deflection. While collar height primarily influenced deflection, a larger collar height was beneficial in reducing pier deflection at the end of the strengthened segment. Adding a small amount of collar reinforcement improved the performance of piers; however, this improvement was limited. The findings of this study address the lack of research on using UHPC for strengthening full-scale bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions and provide valuable references for future designs with similar applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241237575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241237575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过有限元(FE)分析研究了超高性能混凝土(UHPC)墩柱在加固钢筋混凝土(RC)桥墩以防止重型拖拉机-拖车碰撞方面的有效性。首先,提供了经过验证的 UHPC 和重型牵引拖车的 FE 模型。然后,进行有限元分析以评估 UHPC 套环的加固性能。比较了 UHPC 套环与传统 RC 套环的效果,并研究了不同 UHPC 套环厚度、高度和套环加固的影响。结果表明,重型车辆碰撞对桥墩造成的最严重破坏主要发生在高度约 2000 毫米以下,表现为斜向剪切裂缝和塑性铰链。因此,建议的最小领口高度为 2000 毫米。UHPC 套环与 RC 套环加固的比较表明,UHPC 套环的效果更佳。130 毫米的 UHPC 套圈与 180 毫米的 RC 套圈具有相似的加固效果。研究发现,在 UHPC 套环的厚度、高度和套环加固三个调查参数中,套环厚度对 UHPC 套环在破坏形态、能量吸收和最大挠度方面的效果影响最大。套圈高度主要影响挠度,较大的套圈高度有利于减少加固段末端的墩台挠度。增加少量轴颈加固可以改善桥墩的性能,但这种改善是有限的。本研究的结果弥补了使用超高性能混凝土加固全尺寸桥墩以防止重型牵引车碰撞的研究不足,并为未来类似应用的设计提供了宝贵的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening reinforced concrete bridge piers against heavy vehicle collisions with ultra-high performance concrete collars: A finite element analysis study
This paper investigates the effectiveness of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) collars in strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions through finite element (FE) analysis. First, validated FE models of UHPC and a heavy tractor-trailer were provided. Then, FE analyses were conducted to evaluate the strengthening performance of the UHPC collar. The effectiveness of UHPC collar was compared with conventional RC collar, and the effects of varying UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement were investigated. The results showed that the most severe damage observed on bridge piers due to heavy vehicle collisions primarily occurred below a height of approximately 2000 mm, manifested as diagonal shear cracks and plastic hinges. Therefore, the recommended minimum collar height is 2000 mm. The comparison between UHPC collar and RC collar strengthening demonstrated the superior effectiveness of UHPC collars. A 130-mm UHPC collar exhibited a similar strengthening effect as an 180-mm RC collar. Among the three investigated parameters of UHPC collar thickness, height, and collar reinforcement, the study found that collar thickness had the most significant influence on the effectiveness of the UHPC collar in terms of damage pattern, energy absorption, and maximum deflection. While collar height primarily influenced deflection, a larger collar height was beneficial in reducing pier deflection at the end of the strengthened segment. Adding a small amount of collar reinforcement improved the performance of piers; however, this improvement was limited. The findings of this study address the lack of research on using UHPC for strengthening full-scale bridge piers against heavy tractor-trailer collisions and provide valuable references for future designs with similar applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Structural Engineering
Advances in Structural Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
230
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Multi-experimental seismic analysis of low-rise thin reinforced concrete wall building with unconnected elastomeric isolators using real-time hybrid simulations Prediction and optimization framework of shear strength of reinforced concrete flanged shear wall based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II Deep learning-based minute-scale digital prediction model for temperature induced deflection of a multi-tower double-layer steel truss bridge Experimental investigation on shear behavior of double-row perforated GFRP rib connectors in FRP-concrete hybrid beams Seismic response prediction method of train-bridge coupled system based on convolutional neural network-bidirectional long short-term memory-attention modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1