经皮射频透热疗法与超声波疗法对斜方肌上部潜在肌筋膜触发点的影响:随机交叉试验

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BMR-230296
Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz
{"title":"经皮射频透热疗法与超声波疗法对斜方肌上部潜在肌筋膜触发点的影响:随机交叉试验","authors":"Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of transcutaneous radiofrequency diathermy versus ultrasound on latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius: A randomized crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-230296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230296\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,射频透热疗法在治疗颈部疼痛方面的应用正在蓬勃发展:本研究旨在评估数字电容透热疗法(DCD®)对斜方肌上部潜在肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)患者的僵硬、疼痛、颈椎活动范围和颈椎残疾的临床疗效,并将其与超声波(US)进行比较:19名斜方肌上部潜伏性MTrP患者参加了这项由评估者掩蔽的随机临床交叉试验。受试者接受了两种干预:治疗效果通过肌电图变量、压痛阈值(PPT)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、颈椎侧弯屈幅度和颈部残疾指数量表(NDI)进行测量:结果:在结果指标的变化方面,US 组和 DCD® 组的干预没有明显差异。在 VAS 方面,US 组从 2.16 分到 1.13 分(p= 0.005;r= 0.646)的差异具有统计学意义。DCD® 干预后一周,NDI 有了 1.11 分的显著改善(95% CI 0.14-2.07;p= 0.27;d= 0.217):我们的研究结果表明,DCD® 和 US 均可被视为治疗潜伏性 MTrPs 的有效方法,其中 DCD® 疗法的作用时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of transcutaneous radiofrequency diathermy versus ultrasound on latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius: A randomized crossover trial.

Background: Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.

Methods: Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).

Results: There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Effects of time-dependent acupuncture on back muscle endurance in women with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized crossover trial. Effectiveness of monopolar diathermy by radiofrequency combined with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Percutaneous functional spinal unit cementoplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture complicated with endplate-disc complex injury: A retrospective case-control study. The back body temperatures of patients with idiopathic scoliosis measured through exercise Cognitive functional therapy for lower back pain: A meta-analytical assessment of pain and disability outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1