肺癌再照射:探索利用率、治疗方式和结果相关因素的变化。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004
Anna Gullhaug , Vilde D. Haakensen , Dirk De Ruysscher , Charles B. Simone II , Alexandra E. Hotca-Cho , Arpit M. Chhabra , Taran P. Hellebust , Erna E. Paulsen , Maria P. Dimopoulos , Safora Johansen
{"title":"肺癌再照射:探索利用率、治疗方式和结果相关因素的变化。","authors":"Anna Gullhaug ,&nbsp;Vilde D. Haakensen ,&nbsp;Dirk De Ruysscher ,&nbsp;Charles B. Simone II ,&nbsp;Alexandra E. Hotca-Cho ,&nbsp;Arpit M. Chhabra ,&nbsp;Taran P. Hellebust ,&nbsp;Erna E. Paulsen ,&nbsp;Maria P. Dimopoulos ,&nbsp;Safora Johansen","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological advances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC patients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all patients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. During the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT increased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Median time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p&lt;0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the majority received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000183/pdfft?md5=2f555b4c6f959006c03f49ba48a8cd84&pid=1-s2.0-S1939865424000183-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung cancer reirradiation: Exploring modifications to utilization, treatment modalities and factors associated with outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Anna Gullhaug ,&nbsp;Vilde D. Haakensen ,&nbsp;Dirk De Ruysscher ,&nbsp;Charles B. Simone II ,&nbsp;Alexandra E. Hotca-Cho ,&nbsp;Arpit M. Chhabra ,&nbsp;Taran P. Hellebust ,&nbsp;Erna E. Paulsen ,&nbsp;Maria P. Dimopoulos ,&nbsp;Safora Johansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological advances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC patients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all patients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. During the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT increased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Median time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p&lt;0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the majority received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000183/pdfft?md5=2f555b4c6f959006c03f49ba48a8cd84&pid=1-s2.0-S1939865424000183-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌(LC)患者在初次治疗后往往会出现局部治疗失败。由于技术进步,胸腔再照射(re-RT)已成为一种可行的治疗方案。我们试图在一个大型多中心队列中,调查在一个以技术进步为特征的时期内,胸腔再放射治疗在 LC 患者中的应用情况:我们确定了 2010-2020 年间在两家大学医院接受胸部再放射治疗的 LC 患者。从病历和治疗计划系统中提取临床变量和 RT 数据。结果:共纳入 296 例患者(小细胞 LC 30 例,非小细胞 LC 266 例)。三维适形放疗是最常用的放疗技术(63%),86%的患者以姑息治疗为目的接受再放疗。在研究的后半期,胸腔再放射治疗的使用率普遍上升,更多患者接受了治愈性再放射治疗,立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的使用率也有所上升。初次RT和再次RT之间的中位时间为18个月(1-213个月)。只有83/296例患者的联合治疗计划允许登记危险器官(OAR)的联合剂量。大多数高危器官的联合剂量低于指南建议。多变量分析表明,OS 更优(P结论:在研究的后半期,再放射治疗的使用有所增加,但2020年并没有跟上趋势。这些年来,SBRT 和 IMRT 的使用越来越频繁,但大多数人接受的是姑息性再放射治疗。仅为三分之一的患者制定了联合剂量计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lung cancer reirradiation: Exploring modifications to utilization, treatment modalities and factors associated with outcomes

Background

Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological advances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC patients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort.

Methods and materials

LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up.

Results

296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all patients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. During the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT increased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Median time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p<0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT.

Conclusions

The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the majority received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic performance of radiomics in prediction of Ki-67 index status in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Letter to the Editor: A note on language and academic writing The journey of service-learning: Perspectives from medical imaging and therapeutic sciences students Artificial intelligence and advanced MRI techniques: A comprehensive analysis of diffuse gliomas Use of 3D printing technology for custom bolus fabrication in the management of palmar or plantar fibromatosis with radiotherapy: A retrospective case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1