性别差异对冠状动脉手术远端桡动脉入路的可行性和安全性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348
Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro
{"title":"性别差异对冠状动脉手术远端桡动脉入路的可行性和安全性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P  < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P  < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P  = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P  = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P  < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"360-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P  < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P  < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P  = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P  = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P  < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"360-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与男性相比,女性常规经桡动脉入路的成功率较低,痉挛发生率较高。迄今为止,性别对桡动脉远端入路(DRA)性能的影响尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在评估性别对导管插入成功率和 DRA 手术其他性能参数的影响:这是一项前瞻性三中心观察研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性的三中心观察研究,从 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月,收集了所有接受 DRA 冠状动脉手术的连续患者的数据:共登记了 868 例手术,并根据性别分为两组:女性(n = 258)和男性(n = 610)。就脉搏缺失或微弱而言,女性患者的基线特征不如男性患者(29% 对 17%;P 结论:在冠状动脉手术患者中,女性患者的脉搏缺失或微弱率高于男性患者:在接受冠状动脉手术的患者中,无论性别如何,DRA 的成功率都很高,但女性动脉痉挛的发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Background: Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.

Methods: This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.

Results: A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P  < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P  < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P  = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P  = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P  < 0.001].

Conclusion: In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and location of coronary artery disease in anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes after mini-crush or T and minimal protrusion techniques in complex bifurcation lesions: the EVOLUTE-CRUSH III study. Importance of provoked spasms at the sites of nonobstructive stenosis as well as at the sites of obstructive stenosis in patients with obstructive coronary arteries and coronary spasm. Association between hyperuricemia and chronic total coronary occlusion in non-chronic kidney disease populations: a cross-sectional study. A dynamic nomogram for predicting in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with both coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation: a multicenter retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1