评估阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗与改良型仑伐替尼治疗Child-Pugh A型不可切除肝细胞癌的效果

Cancer diagnosis & prognosis Pub Date : 2024-03-03 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.21873/cdp.10297
Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Makiko Go, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Eiseki Usami
{"title":"评估阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗与改良型仑伐替尼治疗Child-Pugh A型不可切除肝细胞癌的效果","authors":"Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Makiko Go, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Eiseki Usami","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/BV) and lenvatinib (LEN) are the recommended first-line treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous reports have suggested that the tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of LEN could be enhanced by modifying its administration method. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of Atez/BV, the standard LEN therapy (standard LEN), and modified LEN therapy (modified LEN).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The overall survival (OS) and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups treated with Atez/BV (n=36), standard LEN (n=30), and modified LEN (n=11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discontinuation due to AEs was required in 22.2%, 23.3%, and 9.1% of patients in the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups (p=0.485). The median OS for the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups was 523 [95% confidence interval (CI)=163-818], 382 (95%CI=330-547), and 604 (95% CI=257-656) days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.949).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atez/BV and the standard and modified LEN regimens showed comparable efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10905284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab <i>Versus</i> Modified Lenvatinib Therapy in Child-Pugh A Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Makiko Go, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Eiseki Usami\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/cdp.10297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/BV) and lenvatinib (LEN) are the recommended first-line treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous reports have suggested that the tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of LEN could be enhanced by modifying its administration method. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of Atez/BV, the standard LEN therapy (standard LEN), and modified LEN therapy (modified LEN).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The overall survival (OS) and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups treated with Atez/BV (n=36), standard LEN (n=30), and modified LEN (n=11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discontinuation due to AEs was required in 22.2%, 23.3%, and 9.1% of patients in the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups (p=0.485). The median OS for the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups was 523 [95% confidence interval (CI)=163-818], 382 (95%CI=330-547), and 604 (95% CI=257-656) days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.949).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atez/BV and the standard and modified LEN regimens showed comparable efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10905284/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:阿特珠单抗/贝伐单抗(Atez/BV)和来伐替尼(LEN)是不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的推荐一线治疗药物。之前有报道称,通过改变给药方法可以提高来伐替尼的耐受性和疗效。因此,本研究比较了Atez/BV、标准LEN疗法(标准LEN)和改良LEN疗法(改良LEN)的疗效和安全性:比较了Atez/BV治疗组(36例)、标准LEN治疗组(30例)和改良LEN治疗组(11例)的总生存率(OS)和因不良事件(AEs)导致的停药率:Atez/BV组、标准LEN组和改良LEN组分别有22.2%、23.3%和9.1%的患者因AEs而需要停药(P=0.485)。Atez/BV组、标准LEN组和改良LEN组的中位OS分别为523天[95%置信区间(CI)=163-818]、382天(95%CI=330-547)和604天(95%CI=257-656)(对数秩检验,P=0.949):结论:Atez/BV与标准和改良LEN方案的疗效和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Modified Lenvatinib Therapy in Child-Pugh A Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background/aim: Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/BV) and lenvatinib (LEN) are the recommended first-line treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous reports have suggested that the tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of LEN could be enhanced by modifying its administration method. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of Atez/BV, the standard LEN therapy (standard LEN), and modified LEN therapy (modified LEN).

Patients and methods: The overall survival (OS) and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups treated with Atez/BV (n=36), standard LEN (n=30), and modified LEN (n=11).

Results: Discontinuation due to AEs was required in 22.2%, 23.3%, and 9.1% of patients in the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups (p=0.485). The median OS for the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups was 523 [95% confidence interval (CI)=163-818], 382 (95%CI=330-547), and 604 (95% CI=257-656) days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.949).

Conclusion: Atez/BV and the standard and modified LEN regimens showed comparable efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drainage Fluid Amylase as a Biomarker for the Detection of Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Two-center Study. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Withdrawal Syndrome After Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Bilateral Dermoid Ovarian Cysts in a Young Woman - A Case Report and Literature Review. Bilateral Parotid Gland Oncocytoma Mimicking Oropharyngeal Cancer Metastasis: A Case Report from a Radiation Oncologist's Perspective. Correlation Between Serum and Tissue SIRT1 Levels in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1