精神病学中的多基因评分伦理:雷区还是以患者为中心的精神病学的机遇?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Psychiatric Genetics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/YPG.0000000000000363
Roel H P Wouters, Marte Z van der Horst, Cora M Aalfs, Janita Bralten, Jurjen J Luykx, Janneke R Zinkstok
{"title":"精神病学中的多基因评分伦理:雷区还是以患者为中心的精神病学的机遇?","authors":"Roel H P Wouters, Marte Z van der Horst, Cora M Aalfs, Janita Bralten, Jurjen J Luykx, Janneke R Zinkstok","doi":"10.1097/YPG.0000000000000363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advancements in psychiatric genetics have sparked a lively debate on the opportunities and pitfalls of incorporating polygenic scores into clinical practice. Yet, several ethical concerns have been raised, casting doubt on whether further development and implementation of polygenic scores would be compatible with providing ethically responsible care. While these ethical issues warrant thoughtful consideration, it is equally important to recognize the unresolved need for guidance on heritability among patients and their families. Increasing the availability of genetic counseling services in psychiatry should be regarded as a first step toward meeting these needs. As a next step, future integration of novel genetic tools such as polygenic scores into genetic counseling may be a promising way to improve psychiatric counseling practice. By embedding the exploration of polygenic psychiatry into the supporting environment of genetic counseling, some of the previously identified ethical pitfalls may be prevented, and opportunities to bolster patient empowerment can be seized upon. To ensure an ethically responsible approach to psychiatric genetics, active collaboration with patients and their relatives is essential, accompanied by educational efforts to facilitate informed discussions between psychiatrists and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20734,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethics of polygenic scores in psychiatry: minefield or opportunity for patient-centered psychiatry?\",\"authors\":\"Roel H P Wouters, Marte Z van der Horst, Cora M Aalfs, Janita Bralten, Jurjen J Luykx, Janneke R Zinkstok\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YPG.0000000000000363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent advancements in psychiatric genetics have sparked a lively debate on the opportunities and pitfalls of incorporating polygenic scores into clinical practice. Yet, several ethical concerns have been raised, casting doubt on whether further development and implementation of polygenic scores would be compatible with providing ethically responsible care. While these ethical issues warrant thoughtful consideration, it is equally important to recognize the unresolved need for guidance on heritability among patients and their families. Increasing the availability of genetic counseling services in psychiatry should be regarded as a first step toward meeting these needs. As a next step, future integration of novel genetic tools such as polygenic scores into genetic counseling may be a promising way to improve psychiatric counseling practice. By embedding the exploration of polygenic psychiatry into the supporting environment of genetic counseling, some of the previously identified ethical pitfalls may be prevented, and opportunities to bolster patient empowerment can be seized upon. To ensure an ethically responsible approach to psychiatric genetics, active collaboration with patients and their relatives is essential, accompanied by educational efforts to facilitate informed discussions between psychiatrists and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0000000000000363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0000000000000363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病遗传学的最新进展引发了一场关于将多基因评分纳入临床实践的机遇与隐患的热烈讨论。然而,人们也提出了一些伦理方面的问题,对进一步开发和实施多基因评分是否符合提供有伦理责任的医疗服务产生了怀疑。虽然这些伦理问题值得深思熟虑,但同样重要的是要认识到患者及其家属对遗传性指导的需求尚未得到解决。在精神病学领域提供更多遗传咨询服务应被视为满足这些需求的第一步。下一步,未来将新型遗传工具(如多基因评分)整合到遗传咨询中,可能是改善精神科咨询实践的一个很有前景的方法。通过将多基因精神病学的探索融入遗传咨询的支持环境中,可以避免之前发现的一些伦理陷阱,并抓住机会增强患者的能力。为了确保精神科遗传学的伦理责任,与患者及其亲属积极合作是必不可少的,同时还要开展教育工作,促进精神科医生与患者之间进行知情讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ethics of polygenic scores in psychiatry: minefield or opportunity for patient-centered psychiatry?

Recent advancements in psychiatric genetics have sparked a lively debate on the opportunities and pitfalls of incorporating polygenic scores into clinical practice. Yet, several ethical concerns have been raised, casting doubt on whether further development and implementation of polygenic scores would be compatible with providing ethically responsible care. While these ethical issues warrant thoughtful consideration, it is equally important to recognize the unresolved need for guidance on heritability among patients and their families. Increasing the availability of genetic counseling services in psychiatry should be regarded as a first step toward meeting these needs. As a next step, future integration of novel genetic tools such as polygenic scores into genetic counseling may be a promising way to improve psychiatric counseling practice. By embedding the exploration of polygenic psychiatry into the supporting environment of genetic counseling, some of the previously identified ethical pitfalls may be prevented, and opportunities to bolster patient empowerment can be seized upon. To ensure an ethically responsible approach to psychiatric genetics, active collaboration with patients and their relatives is essential, accompanied by educational efforts to facilitate informed discussions between psychiatrists and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Genetics
Psychiatric Genetics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​The journal aims to publish papers which bring together clinical observations, psychological and behavioural abnormalities and genetic data. All papers are fully refereed. Psychiatric Genetics is also a forum for reporting new approaches to genetic research in psychiatry and neurology utilizing novel techniques or methodologies. Psychiatric Genetics publishes original Research Reports dealing with inherited factors involved in psychiatric and neurological disorders. This encompasses gene localization and chromosome markers, changes in neuronal gene expression related to psychiatric disease, linkage genetics analyses, family, twin and adoption studies, and genetically based animal models of neuropsychiatric disease. The journal covers areas such as molecular neurobiology and molecular genetics relevant to mental illness. Reviews of the literature and Commentaries in areas of current interest will be considered for publication. Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside psychiatric genetics, but of interest and importance to Psychiatric Genetics, will also be considered. Psychiatric Genetics also publishes Book Reviews, Brief Reports and Conference Reports.
期刊最新文献
The association among multiple-site chronic pain, sedentary behavior, and major depressive disorders: a mendelian randomization study. Association of NTRK2 gene with suicidality: a meta-analysis. A new case with coexistence of mosaic 48,XYYY/47,XYY, and CACNA1E variant in autism spectrum disorder. Genomics and pharmacogenomics of cluster headache: implications for personalized management? A systematic review. Further evidence of the role of microRNA in schizophrenia: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1