将步调作为体育锻炼干预的行为目标:叙述性综述

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1177/15598276241236417
Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, T. Isaac White, Hannah A. Lavoie, Courtney M. Monroe, Demetra D. Christou
{"title":"将步调作为体育锻炼干预的行为目标:叙述性综述","authors":"Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, T. Isaac White, Hannah A. Lavoie, Courtney M. Monroe, Demetra D. Christou","doi":"10.1177/15598276241236417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral interventions targeting moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) to ensure health benefits can be strengthened by a simple metric that helps adults understand if they are exercising at the target intensity. Laboratory studies have established that a cadence of 100 steps/min is equivalent to MVPA, but intervention application is largely unexplored. The aim of this narrative review was to describe how cadence has been implemented in behavioral interventions. PubMed, PsychInfo, and SCOPUS were searched with a standardized search string. Studies were included if peer-reviewed interventions reporting on targeting MVPA increases for adults through cadence or if non-intervention programs directly targeting cadence. Of 232 unique studies identified, 6 were included in the final sample. Cadence was monitored using subjective cues (n = 3), time-oriented goals (n = 2), step-counting (n = 2), auditory cues (n = 2), and visual cues (n = 2), and measured by pedometers (n = 5) or mp3 player (n = 1). No studies reported detailed participant instructions to teach cadence. Results suggest that use of cadence in behavioral interventions is feasible but nascent. Reviewed studies provided insufficient detail to replicate methods and there was no consensus on best practices for implementing cadence. Results point to the potential utility of cadence and offer approaches for future refinement and standardization.","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cadence as a Behavioral Target in Physical Activity Interventions: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, T. Isaac White, Hannah A. Lavoie, Courtney M. Monroe, Demetra D. Christou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15598276241236417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Behavioral interventions targeting moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) to ensure health benefits can be strengthened by a simple metric that helps adults understand if they are exercising at the target intensity. Laboratory studies have established that a cadence of 100 steps/min is equivalent to MVPA, but intervention application is largely unexplored. The aim of this narrative review was to describe how cadence has been implemented in behavioral interventions. PubMed, PsychInfo, and SCOPUS were searched with a standardized search string. Studies were included if peer-reviewed interventions reporting on targeting MVPA increases for adults through cadence or if non-intervention programs directly targeting cadence. Of 232 unique studies identified, 6 were included in the final sample. Cadence was monitored using subjective cues (n = 3), time-oriented goals (n = 2), step-counting (n = 2), auditory cues (n = 2), and visual cues (n = 2), and measured by pedometers (n = 5) or mp3 player (n = 1). No studies reported detailed participant instructions to teach cadence. Results suggest that use of cadence in behavioral interventions is feasible but nascent. Reviewed studies provided insufficient detail to replicate methods and there was no consensus on best practices for implementing cadence. Results point to the potential utility of cadence and offer approaches for future refinement and standardization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241236417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241236417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对中强度到高强度体育锻炼(MVPA)的行为干预可通过一个简单的指标来加强,以确保对健康有益,该指标可帮助成年人了解他们是否以目标强度进行锻炼。实验室研究已经证实,100 步/分钟的步频相当于 MVPA,但干预措施的应用在很大程度上尚未探索。本综述旨在描述如何在行为干预中实施步频。我们使用标准搜索字符串对 PubMed、PsychInfo 和 SCOPUS 进行了检索。如果有同行评议的研究报告称,通过卡顿来增加成年人的 MVPA,或直接针对卡顿的非干预计划,则纳入研究。在确定的 232 项独特研究中,有 6 项被纳入最终样本。使用主观提示(n = 3)、时间导向目标(n = 2)、计步(n = 2)、听觉提示(n = 2)和视觉提示(n = 2)监测步速,并通过计步器(n = 5)或 MP3 播放器(n = 1)进行测量。没有研究报告详细说明了如何指导参与者学习步频。结果表明,在行为干预中使用步频是可行的,但刚刚起步。所回顾的研究没有提供足够的细节来复制方法,也没有就实施步调一致的最佳实践达成共识。研究结果表明了步调一致的潜在作用,并为今后的改进和标准化提供了方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cadence as a Behavioral Target in Physical Activity Interventions: A Narrative Review
Behavioral interventions targeting moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) to ensure health benefits can be strengthened by a simple metric that helps adults understand if they are exercising at the target intensity. Laboratory studies have established that a cadence of 100 steps/min is equivalent to MVPA, but intervention application is largely unexplored. The aim of this narrative review was to describe how cadence has been implemented in behavioral interventions. PubMed, PsychInfo, and SCOPUS were searched with a standardized search string. Studies were included if peer-reviewed interventions reporting on targeting MVPA increases for adults through cadence or if non-intervention programs directly targeting cadence. Of 232 unique studies identified, 6 were included in the final sample. Cadence was monitored using subjective cues (n = 3), time-oriented goals (n = 2), step-counting (n = 2), auditory cues (n = 2), and visual cues (n = 2), and measured by pedometers (n = 5) or mp3 player (n = 1). No studies reported detailed participant instructions to teach cadence. Results suggest that use of cadence in behavioral interventions is feasible but nascent. Reviewed studies provided insufficient detail to replicate methods and there was no consensus on best practices for implementing cadence. Results point to the potential utility of cadence and offer approaches for future refinement and standardization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lifestyle Medicine Health Behavior Scale Examining Real-World Evidence of Depression-Related Symptom Reduction Through a Comprehensive Holistic Lifestyle Intervention World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims Promoting Physical Activity Among Health Professional Students, Faculty, and Staff Members: A Competition-Based Intervention Association of Parent and Child Intuitive Eating: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1