Shuyi Liang, Kai-Tai Fang, Xin-Wei Huang, Yijing Xin, Chang-Xing Ma
{"title":"分层双边和单边相关数据的同质性检验和风险差异区间估计","authors":"Shuyi Liang, Kai-Tai Fang, Xin-Wei Huang, Yijing Xin, Chang-Xing Ma","doi":"10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In clinical trials studying paired parts of a subject with binary outcomes, it is expected to collect measurements bilaterally. However, there are cases where subjects contribute measurements for only one part. By utilizing combined data, it is possible to gain additional information compared to using bilateral or unilateral data alone. With the combined data, this article investigates homogeneity tests of risk differences with the presence of stratification effects and proposes interval estimations of a common risk difference if stratification does not introduce underlying dissimilarities. Under Dallal’s model (Biometrics 44:253–257, 1988), we propose three test statistics and evaluate their performances regarding type I error controls and powers. Confidence intervals of a common risk difference with satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval length are constructed. Our simulation results show that the score test is the most robust and the profile likelihood confidence interval outperforms other methods proposed. Data from a study of acute otitis media is used to illustrate our proposed procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51166,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Papers","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data\",\"authors\":\"Shuyi Liang, Kai-Tai Fang, Xin-Wei Huang, Yijing Xin, Chang-Xing Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In clinical trials studying paired parts of a subject with binary outcomes, it is expected to collect measurements bilaterally. However, there are cases where subjects contribute measurements for only one part. By utilizing combined data, it is possible to gain additional information compared to using bilateral or unilateral data alone. With the combined data, this article investigates homogeneity tests of risk differences with the presence of stratification effects and proposes interval estimations of a common risk difference if stratification does not introduce underlying dissimilarities. Under Dallal’s model (Biometrics 44:253–257, 1988), we propose three test statistics and evaluate their performances regarding type I error controls and powers. Confidence intervals of a common risk difference with satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval length are constructed. Our simulation results show that the score test is the most robust and the profile likelihood confidence interval outperforms other methods proposed. Data from a study of acute otitis media is used to illustrate our proposed procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Papers\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在对受试者的成对部分进行二元结果研究的临床试验中,预计要收集双侧的测量数据。不过,也有受试者只对一个部位进行测量的情况。与单独使用双侧或单侧数据相比,利用组合数据可以获得更多信息。利用合并数据,本文研究了存在分层效应时风险差异的同质性检验,并提出了在分层不引入潜在差异的情况下共同风险差异的区间估计。根据 Dallal 的模型(Biometrics 44:253-257, 1988),我们提出了三种检验统计量,并评估了它们在 I 型误差控制和幂级数方面的表现。我们构建了具有令人满意的覆盖概率和区间长度的共同风险差异置信区间。我们的模拟结果表明,得分检验是最稳健的,轮廓似然置信区间优于其他方法。我们使用急性中耳炎的研究数据来说明我们提出的程序。
Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data
In clinical trials studying paired parts of a subject with binary outcomes, it is expected to collect measurements bilaterally. However, there are cases where subjects contribute measurements for only one part. By utilizing combined data, it is possible to gain additional information compared to using bilateral or unilateral data alone. With the combined data, this article investigates homogeneity tests of risk differences with the presence of stratification effects and proposes interval estimations of a common risk difference if stratification does not introduce underlying dissimilarities. Under Dallal’s model (Biometrics 44:253–257, 1988), we propose three test statistics and evaluate their performances regarding type I error controls and powers. Confidence intervals of a common risk difference with satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval length are constructed. Our simulation results show that the score test is the most robust and the profile likelihood confidence interval outperforms other methods proposed. Data from a study of acute otitis media is used to illustrate our proposed procedures.
期刊介绍:
The journal Statistical Papers addresses itself to all persons and organizations that have to deal with statistical methods in their own field of work. It attempts to provide a forum for the presentation and critical assessment of statistical methods, in particular for the discussion of their methodological foundations as well as their potential applications. Methods that have broad applications will be preferred. However, special attention is given to those statistical methods which are relevant to the economic and social sciences. In addition to original research papers, readers will find survey articles, short notes, reports on statistical software, problem section, and book reviews.