CFLOBDDs:无上下文语言有序二元判定图

IF 1.5 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1145/3651157
Meghana Aparna Sistla, Swarat Chaudhuri, Thomas Reps
{"title":"CFLOBDDs:无上下文语言有序二元判定图","authors":"Meghana Aparna Sistla, Swarat Chaudhuri, Thomas Reps","doi":"10.1145/3651157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a new compressed representation of Boolean functions, called CFLOBDDs (for Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams). They are essentially a plug-compatible alternative to BDDs (Binary Decision Diagrams), and hence useful for representing certain classes of functions, matrices, graphs, relations, etc. in a highly compressed fashion. CFLOBDDs share many of the good properties of BDDs, but—in the best case—the CFLOBDD for a Boolean function can be <i>exponentially smaller than any BDD for that function</i>. Compared with the size of the decision tree for a function, a CFLOBDD—again, in the best case—can give a <i>double-exponential reduction in size</i>. They have the potential to permit applications to (i) execute much faster, and (ii) handle much larger problem instances than has been possible heretofore. </p><p>We applied CFLOBDDs in quantum-circuit simulation, and found that for several standard problems the improvement in scalability, compared to BDDs, is quite dramatic. With a 15-minute timeout, the number of qubits that CFLOBDDs can handle are 65,536 for GHZ, 524,288 for BV; 4,194,304 for DJ; and 4,096 for Grover’s Algorithm, besting BDDs by factors of 128 ×, 1,024 ×, 8,192 ×, and 128 ×, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50939,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams\",\"authors\":\"Meghana Aparna Sistla, Swarat Chaudhuri, Thomas Reps\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3651157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents a new compressed representation of Boolean functions, called CFLOBDDs (for Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams). They are essentially a plug-compatible alternative to BDDs (Binary Decision Diagrams), and hence useful for representing certain classes of functions, matrices, graphs, relations, etc. in a highly compressed fashion. CFLOBDDs share many of the good properties of BDDs, but—in the best case—the CFLOBDD for a Boolean function can be <i>exponentially smaller than any BDD for that function</i>. Compared with the size of the decision tree for a function, a CFLOBDD—again, in the best case—can give a <i>double-exponential reduction in size</i>. They have the potential to permit applications to (i) execute much faster, and (ii) handle much larger problem instances than has been possible heretofore. </p><p>We applied CFLOBDDs in quantum-circuit simulation, and found that for several standard problems the improvement in scalability, compared to BDDs, is quite dramatic. With a 15-minute timeout, the number of qubits that CFLOBDDs can handle are 65,536 for GHZ, 524,288 for BV; 4,194,304 for DJ; and 4,096 for Grover’s Algorithm, besting BDDs by factors of 128 ×, 1,024 ×, 8,192 ×, and 128 ×, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3651157\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3651157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的布尔函数压缩表示法,称为 CFLOBDDs(上下文自由语言有序二元判定图)。CFLOBDDs 本质上是 BDDs(二元判定图)的插件兼容替代品,因此有助于以高度压缩的方式表示某些类别的函数、矩阵、图、关系等。CFLOBDD 具有 BDD 的许多优良特性,但在最佳情况下,布尔函数的 CFLOBDD 比该函数的任何 BDD 都要小几倍。与一个函数的决策树的大小相比,CFLOBDD--同样,在最佳情况下--可以实现双倍指数级的缩减。CFLOBDD 有可能使应用程序 (i) 执行速度更快,(ii) 处理的问题实例比以前大得多。我们在量子电路仿真中应用了 CFLOBDD,发现对于一些标准问题,与 BDD 相比,CFLOBDD 在可扩展性方面的改进相当显著。在 15 分钟超时的情况下,CFLOBDDs 可处理的量子比特数分别为:GHZ 65,536 个、BV 524,288 个、DJ 4,194,304 个和 Grover 算法 4,096 个,分别比 BDDs 高出 128 ×、1,024 ×、8,192 × 和 128 × 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams

This paper presents a new compressed representation of Boolean functions, called CFLOBDDs (for Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams). They are essentially a plug-compatible alternative to BDDs (Binary Decision Diagrams), and hence useful for representing certain classes of functions, matrices, graphs, relations, etc. in a highly compressed fashion. CFLOBDDs share many of the good properties of BDDs, but—in the best case—the CFLOBDD for a Boolean function can be exponentially smaller than any BDD for that function. Compared with the size of the decision tree for a function, a CFLOBDD—again, in the best case—can give a double-exponential reduction in size. They have the potential to permit applications to (i) execute much faster, and (ii) handle much larger problem instances than has been possible heretofore.

We applied CFLOBDDs in quantum-circuit simulation, and found that for several standard problems the improvement in scalability, compared to BDDs, is quite dramatic. With a 15-minute timeout, the number of qubits that CFLOBDDs can handle are 65,536 for GHZ, 524,288 for BV; 4,194,304 for DJ; and 4,096 for Grover’s Algorithm, besting BDDs by factors of 128 ×, 1,024 ×, 8,192 ×, and 128 ×, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) is the premier journal for reporting recent research advances in the areas of programming languages, and systems to assist the task of programming. Papers can be either theoretical or experimental in style, but in either case, they must contain innovative and novel content that advances the state of the art of programming languages and systems. We also invite strictly experimental papers that compare existing approaches, as well as tutorial and survey papers. The scope of TOPLAS includes, but is not limited to, the following subjects: language design for sequential and parallel programming programming language implementation programming language semantics compilers and interpreters runtime systems for program execution storage allocation and garbage collection languages and methods for writing program specifications languages and methods for secure and reliable programs testing and verification of programs
期刊最新文献
Proving Correctness of Parallel Implementations of Transition System Models CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams Adversities in Abstract Interpretation: Accommodating Robustness by Abstract Interpretation: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems: Vol 0, No ja Homeostasis: Design and Implementation of a Self-Stabilizing Compiler Locally Abstract, Globally Concrete Semantics of Concurrent Programming Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1