新型快速静脉注射丹曲林制剂(NPJ5008)与标准丹曲林(DANTRIUM IV)的对比:在健康志愿者中进行的临床部分随机 1 期研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001966
Richard H Ng Kwet Shing, Lucy B Clayton, Samuel L Smith, Marc J Watson, Litza M McKenzie, David P Chalmers, Gareth Whitaker, Jonathan G Bilmen
{"title":"新型快速静脉注射丹曲林制剂(NPJ5008)与标准丹曲林(DANTRIUM IV)的对比:在健康志愿者中进行的临床部分随机 1 期研究。","authors":"Richard H Ng Kwet Shing, Lucy B Clayton, Samuel L Smith, Marc J Watson, Litza M McKenzie, David P Chalmers, Gareth Whitaker, Jonathan G Bilmen","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000001966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in treating anaesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia increase risks of complications and death. NPJ5008 is a novel formulation of the indicated treatment, dantrolene sodium, developed to shorten preparation and administration times compared with the reference formulation Dantrium®. The two formulations have been compared preclinically.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess bioequivalence of overall dantrolene (free acid) exposure of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® and ascertain similarities in their pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability profiles. Evaluate preparation/administration time savings for the new formulation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Part 1 of this open-label trial in humans was a 1 : 1 randomised crossover study; part 2 was a single-arm study. Trial pharmacy data and laboratory simulations assessed preparation/administration step timings.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single clinical centre in the UK, April to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-one healthy male and female individuals.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Part 1: single intravenous 60 mg dose of NPJ5008 or Dantrium®, sequentially. Part 2: single intravenous 120 mg dose of NPJ5008. Simulation: five vials per formulation using paediatric and adult cannulas.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Overall drug exposure to last measurable concentration (AUC 0 to last ) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0 to ∞ ) were primary endpoints. Other pharmacokinetic, clinical and muscle-function parameters, and adverse events, were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted geometric mean ratios of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® were 90.24 and 90.44% for AUC 0 to last and AUC 0 to ∞ , respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) within the 80 to 125% acceptance interval, establishing bioequivalence. No new safety issues emerged: any adverse events were of a similar magnitude across treatments and related to pharmacological properties of dantrolene. Pharmacy and simulation data revealed that every step in preparation and administration was 26 to 69% faster for NPJ5008 than Dantrium®.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPJ5008 showed comparable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to Dantrium®, while reducing dantrolene dose preparation/administration times, potentially reducing patient complications/healthcare resourcing in malignant hyperthermia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT Number: 2020-005719-35, MHRA approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The novel rapid formulation of intravenous dantrolene (NPJ5008) versus standard dantrolene (Dantrium®): A clinical part-randomised phase 1 study in healthy volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Richard H Ng Kwet Shing, Lucy B Clayton, Samuel L Smith, Marc J Watson, Litza M McKenzie, David P Chalmers, Gareth Whitaker, Jonathan G Bilmen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000001966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in treating anaesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia increase risks of complications and death. NPJ5008 is a novel formulation of the indicated treatment, dantrolene sodium, developed to shorten preparation and administration times compared with the reference formulation Dantrium®. The two formulations have been compared preclinically.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess bioequivalence of overall dantrolene (free acid) exposure of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® and ascertain similarities in their pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability profiles. Evaluate preparation/administration time savings for the new formulation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Part 1 of this open-label trial in humans was a 1 : 1 randomised crossover study; part 2 was a single-arm study. Trial pharmacy data and laboratory simulations assessed preparation/administration step timings.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single clinical centre in the UK, April to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-one healthy male and female individuals.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Part 1: single intravenous 60 mg dose of NPJ5008 or Dantrium®, sequentially. Part 2: single intravenous 120 mg dose of NPJ5008. Simulation: five vials per formulation using paediatric and adult cannulas.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Overall drug exposure to last measurable concentration (AUC 0 to last ) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0 to ∞ ) were primary endpoints. Other pharmacokinetic, clinical and muscle-function parameters, and adverse events, were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted geometric mean ratios of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® were 90.24 and 90.44% for AUC 0 to last and AUC 0 to ∞ , respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) within the 80 to 125% acceptance interval, establishing bioequivalence. No new safety issues emerged: any adverse events were of a similar magnitude across treatments and related to pharmacological properties of dantrolene. Pharmacy and simulation data revealed that every step in preparation and administration was 26 to 69% faster for NPJ5008 than Dantrium®.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPJ5008 showed comparable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to Dantrium®, while reducing dantrolene dose preparation/administration times, potentially reducing patient complications/healthcare resourcing in malignant hyperthermia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT Number: 2020-005719-35, MHRA approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001966\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:延迟治疗麻醉诱发的恶性高热会增加并发症和死亡的风险。NPJ5008 是用于治疗恶性高热的丹曲林钠的新型制剂,与参考制剂 DANTRIUM IV 相比,该制剂可缩短配制和给药时间。两种制剂已在临床前进行了比较:评估 NPJ5008 与 DANTRIUM IV 的丹曲林(游离酸)总暴露量的生物等效性,并确定两者在药代动力学和安全性/耐受性方面的相似性。评估新制剂节省的制备/给药时间:这项人体开放标签试验的第一部分是一项 1 :设计:这项人体开放标签试验的第一部分是一项 1 : 1 随机交叉研究;第二部分是一项单臂研究。试验药房数据和实验室模拟评估了配制/给药步骤的时间:英国单一临床中心,2021 年 4 月至 7 月:21名健康男性和女性:第 1 部分:单次静脉注射 60 毫克剂量的 NPJ5008 或 DANTRIUM IV,依次进行。第 2 部分:单次静脉注射 120 毫克剂量的 NPJ5008。模拟:使用儿科和成人插管,每种配方5瓶:主要结果测量指标:至最后可测量浓度的总体药物暴露量(AUC0至最后浓度)和推断至无穷大的药物暴露量(AUC0至∞)为主要终点。还监测了其他药代动力学、临床和肌肉功能参数以及不良事件:NPJ5008与DANTRIUM IV的AUC0至最后浓度和AUC0至∞浓度的调整几何平均比分别为90.24%和90.44%,90%置信区间(CI)在80%至125%的接受区间内,确定了生物等效性。没有出现新的安全性问题:各治疗方案的不良反应程度相似,且与丹曲林的药理特性有关。药剂学和模拟数据显示,NPJ5008 在配制和给药过程中的每个步骤都比丹曲林 IV 快 26% 至 69%:结论:NPJ5008显示出与DANTRIUM IV相当的药代动力学和安全性,同时减少了丹曲林剂量准备/给药时间,有可能减少恶性高热患者的并发症/医疗资源:试验注册:EudraCT 编号:2020-005719-35,MHRA 批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The novel rapid formulation of intravenous dantrolene (NPJ5008) versus standard dantrolene (Dantrium®): A clinical part-randomised phase 1 study in healthy volunteers.

Background: Delays in treating anaesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia increase risks of complications and death. NPJ5008 is a novel formulation of the indicated treatment, dantrolene sodium, developed to shorten preparation and administration times compared with the reference formulation Dantrium®. The two formulations have been compared preclinically.

Objectives: Assess bioequivalence of overall dantrolene (free acid) exposure of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® and ascertain similarities in their pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability profiles. Evaluate preparation/administration time savings for the new formulation.

Design: Part 1 of this open-label trial in humans was a 1 : 1 randomised crossover study; part 2 was a single-arm study. Trial pharmacy data and laboratory simulations assessed preparation/administration step timings.

Setting: Single clinical centre in the UK, April to July 2021.

Participants: Twenty-one healthy male and female individuals.

Interventions: Part 1: single intravenous 60 mg dose of NPJ5008 or Dantrium®, sequentially. Part 2: single intravenous 120 mg dose of NPJ5008. Simulation: five vials per formulation using paediatric and adult cannulas.

Main outcome measures: Overall drug exposure to last measurable concentration (AUC 0 to last ) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0 to ∞ ) were primary endpoints. Other pharmacokinetic, clinical and muscle-function parameters, and adverse events, were monitored.

Results: Adjusted geometric mean ratios of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® were 90.24 and 90.44% for AUC 0 to last and AUC 0 to ∞ , respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) within the 80 to 125% acceptance interval, establishing bioequivalence. No new safety issues emerged: any adverse events were of a similar magnitude across treatments and related to pharmacological properties of dantrolene. Pharmacy and simulation data revealed that every step in preparation and administration was 26 to 69% faster for NPJ5008 than Dantrium®.

Conclusion: NPJ5008 showed comparable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to Dantrium®, while reducing dantrolene dose preparation/administration times, potentially reducing patient complications/healthcare resourcing in malignant hyperthermia.

Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2020-005719-35, MHRA approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
A big little problem - postoperative nausea and vomiting incidences are too low! Is it time to add the letter E to the airway management guidelines? Is permissive hypercapnia really pneumoprotective? Reply to: importance of accounting for repeated measure designs when evaluating treatment effects at multiple postoperative days. Rethinking the utility of comparative studies between direct and video laryngoscopy in neonates and infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1