{"title":"过敏性和非过敏性鼻炎对 1 型软骨鼓室成形术成功率的影响","authors":"Elif Ersoy Çallıoğlu , Kazım Bozdemir , Şadan Soyyiğit , Saliha Atalay , Bengi Arslan","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (<em>n</em> = 28), NAR (<em>n</em> = 18) and AR (<em>n</em> = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (<em>p</em> = 0.780, <em>p</em> = 0.167 and <em>p</em> = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (<em>p</em> = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (<em>p</em> = 0.729).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 2","pages":"Pages 102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty\",\"authors\":\"Elif Ersoy Çallıoğlu , Kazım Bozdemir , Şadan Soyyiğit , Saliha Atalay , Bengi Arslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (<em>n</em> = 28), NAR (<em>n</em> = 18) and AR (<em>n</em> = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (<em>p</em> = 0.780, <em>p</em> = 0.167 and <em>p</em> = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (<em>p</em> = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (<em>p</em> = 0.729).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 102-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 探讨过敏性鼻炎(AR)和非过敏性鼻炎(NAR)对 1 型软骨鼓室成形术成功率的影响。 方法 对 60 名 1 型软骨鼓室成形术患者进行了前瞻性研究。根据患者的症状、皮肤点刺试验和/或血清特异性 IgE 水平,将患者分为三组,即无鼻炎组(28 人)、NAR 组(18 人)和 AR 组(14 人)。AR 组和 NAR 组在术前和术后均接受鼻炎症状治疗。结果三组患者的年龄、性别分布和术前气骨间隙相似(分别为 p = 0.780、p = 0.167 和 p = 0.676)。无鼻炎组和 AR 组术后移植物穿孔率为 0%,而 NAR 组为 16.7%,三组间差异显著(p = 0.034)。结论虽然与对照组相比,AR 不会导致鼻炎患者的 1 型软骨鼓室成形术失败,但 NAR 会。对鼻炎患者进行术前和术后治疗以及使用软骨移植可能是 AR 患者手术成功的关键因素。还需要进行样本量更大的进一步研究。
The role of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty
Objective
To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.
Methods
This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (n = 28), NAR (n = 18) and AR (n = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.
Results
Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (p = 0.780, p = 0.167 and p = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (p = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (p = 0.729).
Conclusion
Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.
期刊介绍:
Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.