远程工作对幸福感的影响:纵向分析以及性别、家庭规模和育儿的影响

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Workplace Health Management Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1108/ijwhm-09-2023-0140
Gabriele Prati
{"title":"远程工作对幸福感的影响:纵向分析以及性别、家庭规模和育儿的影响","authors":"Gabriele Prati","doi":"10.1108/ijwhm-09-2023-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being and the potential moderating role of gender, household size and childcare.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The current research used data from the 2016 and 2020 editions of the Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy. Italian workers were asked to report their subjective well-being and how many days per month they work remotely (at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic). Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted on a sample of 1.103 and 184 participants, respectively.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>After controlling for the effects of gender, age, education and perceived economic condition, ordered probit models revealed that the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being was nonsignificant. Moreover, gender, household size and childcare did not play a moderating role in the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings of the current study suggest that an individualized approach is required to maximize the possible benefits of remote work.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The potential positive effects of remote work on subjective well-being might be overestimated.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45766,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Workplace Health Management","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote work’s impact on well-being: longitudinal analysis and the influence of gender, household size and childcare\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Prati\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijwhm-09-2023-0140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being and the potential moderating role of gender, household size and childcare.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The current research used data from the 2016 and 2020 editions of the Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy. Italian workers were asked to report their subjective well-being and how many days per month they work remotely (at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic). Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted on a sample of 1.103 and 184 participants, respectively.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>After controlling for the effects of gender, age, education and perceived economic condition, ordered probit models revealed that the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being was nonsignificant. Moreover, gender, household size and childcare did not play a moderating role in the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings of the current study suggest that an individualized approach is required to maximize the possible benefits of remote work.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The potential positive effects of remote work on subjective well-being might be overestimated.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Workplace Health Management\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Workplace Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwhm-09-2023-0140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Workplace Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwhm-09-2023-0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨远程工作与主观幸福感之间的关系,以及性别、家庭规模和育儿的潜在调节作用。意大利工人被要求报告他们的主观幸福感以及每月远程工作的天数(在 COVID-19 大流行时)。在控制了性别、年龄、教育程度和感知经济条件的影响后,有序 probit 模型显示,远程工作与主观幸福感之间的关系并不显著。此外,性别、家庭规模和儿童保育在远程工作与主观幸福感之间的关系中并没有起到调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote work’s impact on well-being: longitudinal analysis and the influence of gender, household size and childcare

Purpose

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being and the potential moderating role of gender, household size and childcare.

Design/methodology/approach

The current research used data from the 2016 and 2020 editions of the Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy. Italian workers were asked to report their subjective well-being and how many days per month they work remotely (at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic). Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted on a sample of 1.103 and 184 participants, respectively.

Findings

After controlling for the effects of gender, age, education and perceived economic condition, ordered probit models revealed that the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being was nonsignificant. Moreover, gender, household size and childcare did not play a moderating role in the relationship between remote work and subjective well-being.

Practical implications

The findings of the current study suggest that an individualized approach is required to maximize the possible benefits of remote work.

Originality/value

The potential positive effects of remote work on subjective well-being might be overestimated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Workplace Health Management
International Journal of Workplace Health Management PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
22.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Coverage includes, but is not restricted to: ■Best practice examples of successful workplace health solutions ■Promoting compliance with workplace health legislation ■Primary care and primary prevention ■Promoting health in the workplace ■The business case for workplace health promotion ■Workplace health issues and concerns, such as mental health, disability management, violence and the workplace, stress, workplace hazards, risk factor modification and work-life balance ■Workplace Culture ■Workplace policies supporting healthy workplace ■Inducing organizational change ■Occupational health & safety issues ■Educating the employer and employee ■Promoting health outside of the workplace
期刊最新文献
“Happyfly” – an online intervention to improve the art-of-living and well-being among flight attendants How a United States Air Force wing built a hybrid work model that balances organizational needs and employee wellbeing Discriminations in remote work contexts: the pivotal role of diversity and equality management Home-office implementation: challenges and changes in people management Healthy, healthier, hybrid work: the burnout-reducing potential of remote work and the mediating effect of work autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1