阿勒泰模式为道义模式

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Mind & Language Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1111/mila.12504

Qiong Wu

{"title":"阿勒泰模式为道义模式","authors":"Qiong Wu","doi":"10.1111/mila.12504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to one view of alethic modality, alethic modality is deontic modality with respect to thoughts or language. To say that something is necessary is to prescribe norms on how we must think or use language. This view has been argued to have many philosophical advantages over the traditional view that takes alethic modality to describe things in the world. In this article, I argue that the deontic view also enjoys a wide range of empirical support from linguistics and psychology.","PeriodicalId":51472,"journal":{"name":"Mind & Language","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alethic modality is deontic\",\"authors\":\"Qiong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mila.12504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to one view of alethic modality, alethic modality is deontic modality with respect to thoughts or language. To say that something is necessary is to prescribe norms on how we must think or use language. This view has been argued to have many philosophical advantages over the traditional view that takes alethic modality to describe things in the world. In this article, I argue that the deontic view also enjoys a wide range of empirical support from linguistics and psychology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind & Language\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind & Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12504\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind & Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

有一种观点认为，所谓的 "必要模式 "就是思想或语言方面的 "道义模式"。说某事是必要的，就是规定了我们必须如何思考或使用语言的规范。这种观点被认为在哲学上比传统的观点有很多优势，传统观点认为用公理模式来描述世界上的事物。在本文中，我将论证这一观点也得到了语言学和心理学的广泛实证支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Alethic modality is deontic

According to one view of alethic modality, alethic modality is deontic modality with respect to thoughts or language. To say that something is necessary is to prescribe norms on how we must think or use language. This view has been argued to have many philosophical advantages over the traditional view that takes alethic modality to describe things in the world. In this article, I argue that the deontic view also enjoys a wide range of empirical support from linguistics and psychology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊