总 IgE 作为慢性自发性荨麻疹患者对奥马珠单抗反应的生物标记物:一项荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy and asthma proceedings Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.2500/aap.2024.45.230092
Levi Keller, Ekta K Perera, Brittany Bindon, Aastha Khatiwada, Jenny M Stitt, Stephen C Dreskin
{"title":"总 IgE 作为慢性自发性荨麻疹患者对奥马珠单抗反应的生物标记物:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Levi Keller, Ekta K Perera, Brittany Bindon, Aastha Khatiwada, Jenny M Stitt, Stephen C Dreskin","doi":"10.2500/aap.2024.45.230092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels. <b>Objective:</b> We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria. <b>Results:</b> We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"45 2","pages":"97-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total IgE as a biomarker of omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Levi Keller, Ekta K Perera, Brittany Bindon, Aastha Khatiwada, Jenny M Stitt, Stephen C Dreskin\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/aap.2024.45.230092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels. <b>Objective:</b> We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria. <b>Results:</b> We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"97-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2024.45.230092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2024.45.230092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍奥马珠单抗被批准用于治疗抗组胺药难治的慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)。总免疫球蛋白E(IgE)水平已成为预测对奥马珠单抗反应的可能生物标志物。然而,现有文献各不相同,关于总 IgE 水平的作用的结论也相互矛盾。我们的目标是我们试图通过对现有文献进行荟萃分析,明确评估总 IgE 水平在 CSU 患者中的作用,以确定奥马珠单抗应答者和非应答者之间是否存在有意义的变化。方法:共检索到 68 篇引文,并由两名独立审稿人进行了筛选。排除了社论、综述和病例报告,共确定了 33 篇原创文章并进行了二次评估。纳入了提供总 IgE 水平平均值 ± 标准偏差和/或 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的研究,但排除了受试者少于 25 人的研究。最终有三项研究符合上述标准。研究结果我们发现,奥马珠单抗应答者与无应答者的总 IgE 水平的平均差异为 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02),这表明应答者的平均 IgE 值高于无应答者。结论本研究提供了更多证据,支持评估总 IgE 水平,因为它与 CSU 对奥马珠单抗治疗的反应有关。考虑到现有证据,将基线总 IgE 水平视为预测奥马珠单抗治疗反应的生物标志物似乎是合理的。根据现有的文献,我们无法断定在什么阈值时更有可能出现无应答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Total IgE as a biomarker of omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis.

Background: Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels. Objective: We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab. Methods: A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria. Results: We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders. Conclusion: This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Real-world surveillance of standardized quality (SQ) house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablets for 3 years in Japan. A case of a rash after tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis and meningococcal vaccination. Eating increases disease activity in pediatric patients with symptomatic dermographism. A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the bidirectional association between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. Abstracts presented at the Eastern Allergy Conference May 30-June 2, 2024, Palm Beach, Florida.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1