老年社会中的老年痴呆死亡:日本的情况。

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global health & medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.35772/ghm.2023.01127
Reiko Hayashi, Teruhiko Imanaga, Eiji Marui, Hiroshi Kinoshita, Futoshi Ishii, Emiko Shinohara, Motomi Beppu
{"title":"老年社会中的老年痴呆死亡:日本的情况。","authors":"Reiko Hayashi, Teruhiko Imanaga, Eiji Marui, Hiroshi Kinoshita, Futoshi Ishii, Emiko Shinohara, Motomi Beppu","doi":"10.35772/ghm.2023.01127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Senility is now the third largest cause of death in Japan, comprising 11.4% of the total number of deaths in 2022. Although senility deaths were common in the period before the Second World War, they declined sharply from 1950 to 2000 and then increased up to the present. The recent increase is more than what we could expect from an increasing number of very old persons or the increasing number of deaths at facilities. The senility death description in the death certificate is becoming poorer, with 93.8% of them only with a single entry of \"senility\". If other diseases are mentioned, those are again vague diseases or conditions. Senility, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure are the largest causes of death in which senility is mentioned in the death certificate. The period from senility onset to death is often described within a few months, but it varies. In some cases, the deceased's age was written out of a conviction that the ageing process starts from birth. As senility is perceived differently among the certifying doctors, a standardised protocol to certify the senility death is needed. On the other hand, senility death is the preferred cause of death and many people do not wish to receive invasive medical examinations before dying peacefully. Together with other causes of death related to frailty, there would be a need to capture senility as a proper cause of death, not just as a garbage code, in the aged, low-mortality population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12556,"journal":{"name":"Global health & medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Senility deaths in aged societies: The case of Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Reiko Hayashi, Teruhiko Imanaga, Eiji Marui, Hiroshi Kinoshita, Futoshi Ishii, Emiko Shinohara, Motomi Beppu\",\"doi\":\"10.35772/ghm.2023.01127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Senility is now the third largest cause of death in Japan, comprising 11.4% of the total number of deaths in 2022. Although senility deaths were common in the period before the Second World War, they declined sharply from 1950 to 2000 and then increased up to the present. The recent increase is more than what we could expect from an increasing number of very old persons or the increasing number of deaths at facilities. The senility death description in the death certificate is becoming poorer, with 93.8% of them only with a single entry of \\\"senility\\\". If other diseases are mentioned, those are again vague diseases or conditions. Senility, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure are the largest causes of death in which senility is mentioned in the death certificate. The period from senility onset to death is often described within a few months, but it varies. In some cases, the deceased's age was written out of a conviction that the ageing process starts from birth. As senility is perceived differently among the certifying doctors, a standardised protocol to certify the senility death is needed. On the other hand, senility death is the preferred cause of death and many people do not wish to receive invasive medical examinations before dying peacefully. Together with other causes of death related to frailty, there would be a need to capture senility as a proper cause of death, not just as a garbage code, in the aged, low-mortality population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global health & medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"40-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global health & medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2023.01127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2023.01127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,衰老是日本第三大死因,占 2022 年死亡总人数的 11.4%。虽然在第二次世界大战之前,老年痴呆症死亡很常见,但从 1950 年到 2000 年,老年痴呆症死亡人数急剧下降,然后一直增加到现在。最近的增长超出了我们对高龄老人数量增加或设施内死亡人数增加的预期。死亡证明书中对衰老死亡的描述越来越少,93.8%的死亡证明书中只有 "衰老 "一项。如果提到其他疾病,也是模糊的疾病或病症。衰老、痴呆和阿尔茨海默病、脑血管病后遗症和心力衰竭是死亡证明中提及衰老的最大死因。从衰老开始到死亡的时间通常在几个月之内,但也不尽相同。在某些情况下,死者的年龄被写成从出生就开始衰老。由于核证医生对衰老的看法不同,因此需要一个标准化的协议来核证衰老死亡。另一方面,衰老死亡是首选死因,许多人不希望在安详离世前接受侵入性医疗检查。因此,有必要将衰老与其他与身体虚弱有关的死因结合起来,将衰老作为老年人、低死亡率人群的一个适当死因,而不仅仅是一个垃圾代码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Senility deaths in aged societies: The case of Japan.

Senility is now the third largest cause of death in Japan, comprising 11.4% of the total number of deaths in 2022. Although senility deaths were common in the period before the Second World War, they declined sharply from 1950 to 2000 and then increased up to the present. The recent increase is more than what we could expect from an increasing number of very old persons or the increasing number of deaths at facilities. The senility death description in the death certificate is becoming poorer, with 93.8% of them only with a single entry of "senility". If other diseases are mentioned, those are again vague diseases or conditions. Senility, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure are the largest causes of death in which senility is mentioned in the death certificate. The period from senility onset to death is often described within a few months, but it varies. In some cases, the deceased's age was written out of a conviction that the ageing process starts from birth. As senility is perceived differently among the certifying doctors, a standardised protocol to certify the senility death is needed. On the other hand, senility death is the preferred cause of death and many people do not wish to receive invasive medical examinations before dying peacefully. Together with other causes of death related to frailty, there would be a need to capture senility as a proper cause of death, not just as a garbage code, in the aged, low-mortality population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in HIV management and challenges in Japan: Current situation of pre-exposure prophylaxis in Tokyo. Analysis of tumor infiltrating immune cells in Kaposi sarcoma lesions discovers shifts in macrophage populations. Changes in epidemiological and treatment-related characteristics among newly reported HIV/AIDS cases in an urban area in Shanghai, China from 2001 to 2019: A population-based retrospective study. Exploration of PrEP/PEP service delivery model in China: A pilot in eastern, central and western region. Identification of new circulating recombinant form of HIV-1 CRF139_02B in Japan, and search for the origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1