韩国在线报纸文章的健康信息质量。

IF 1.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.23.0197
Hangyeol Lee, Seung-Won Oh
{"title":"韩国在线报纸文章的健康信息质量。","authors":"Hangyeol Lee, Seung-Won Oh","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.23.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Web is an important source of health information, but the quality of such online information is highly variable. This study evaluates the quality of health articles published on Naver News, Korea's most popular portal, using the Health Information Quality Assessment Tool (HIQUAL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 712 health-related articles published on Naver News from May 1 to 7, 2023. After applying exclusion criteria, we selected 116 articles for analysis. Two clinicians independently assessed the quality of these articles using the HIQUAL, which scores articles based on five domains: \"reliability,\" \"usefulness,\" \"understandability,\" \"sufficiency,\" and \"transparency.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall article quality was generally considered recommendable (mean±standard deviation: 7.52±2.00). \"Usefulness,\" one item of \"reliability,\" and \"understandability\" were the three items with the highest levels of satisfaction. \"Sufficiency\" criteria for costs, risks, and benefits received low scores. Quality scores for articles focused on health risk factors and intervention showed a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the overall quality of health information in Korean online newspaper articles is acceptable, room for improvement remains in some areas, particularly with regard to the fair presentation of costs, risks, and benefits. The study highlights the need for ongoing quality improvement and evaluation initiatives for online health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Information Quality of Online Newspaper Articles in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Hangyeol Lee, Seung-Won Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.4082/kjfm.23.0197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Web is an important source of health information, but the quality of such online information is highly variable. This study evaluates the quality of health articles published on Naver News, Korea's most popular portal, using the Health Information Quality Assessment Tool (HIQUAL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 712 health-related articles published on Naver News from May 1 to 7, 2023. After applying exclusion criteria, we selected 116 articles for analysis. Two clinicians independently assessed the quality of these articles using the HIQUAL, which scores articles based on five domains: \\\"reliability,\\\" \\\"usefulness,\\\" \\\"understandability,\\\" \\\"sufficiency,\\\" and \\\"transparency.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall article quality was generally considered recommendable (mean±standard deviation: 7.52±2.00). \\\"Usefulness,\\\" one item of \\\"reliability,\\\" and \\\"understandability\\\" were the three items with the highest levels of satisfaction. \\\"Sufficiency\\\" criteria for costs, risks, and benefits received low scores. Quality scores for articles focused on health risk factors and intervention showed a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the overall quality of health information in Korean online newspaper articles is acceptable, room for improvement remains in some areas, particularly with regard to the fair presentation of costs, risks, and benefits. The study highlights the need for ongoing quality improvement and evaluation initiatives for online health information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:网络是健康信息的重要来源,但此类在线信息的质量参差不齐。本研究使用健康信息质量评估工具(HIQUAL)对韩国最受欢迎的门户网站 Naver News 上发表的健康文章的质量进行了评估:我们收集了 2023 年 5 月 1 日至 7 日在 Naver News 上发表的 712 篇健康相关文章。在应用排除标准后,我们选择了 116 篇文章进行分析。两名临床医生使用 HIQUAL 独立评估了这些文章的质量,HIQUAL 根据五个方面对文章进行评分:HIQUAL 根据 "可靠性"、"有用性"、"可理解性"、"充分性 "和 "透明度 "五个方面对文章进行评分:文章的总体质量被普遍认为是值得推荐的(平均值±标准差:7.52±2.00)。"有用性"、一项 "可靠性 "和 "可理解性 "是满意度最高的三个项目。成本、风险和收益的 "充分性 "标准得分较低。以健康风险因素和干预措施为重点的文章的质量得分在统计学上有显著差异:虽然韩国网络报纸文章中健康信息的总体质量可以接受,但在某些方面仍有改进的余地,尤其是在公平介绍成本、风险和益处方面。这项研究强调了对在线健康信息进行持续质量改进和评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Information Quality of Online Newspaper Articles in Korea.

Background: The Web is an important source of health information, but the quality of such online information is highly variable. This study evaluates the quality of health articles published on Naver News, Korea's most popular portal, using the Health Information Quality Assessment Tool (HIQUAL).

Methods: We collected 712 health-related articles published on Naver News from May 1 to 7, 2023. After applying exclusion criteria, we selected 116 articles for analysis. Two clinicians independently assessed the quality of these articles using the HIQUAL, which scores articles based on five domains: "reliability," "usefulness," "understandability," "sufficiency," and "transparency."

Results: Overall article quality was generally considered recommendable (mean±standard deviation: 7.52±2.00). "Usefulness," one item of "reliability," and "understandability" were the three items with the highest levels of satisfaction. "Sufficiency" criteria for costs, risks, and benefits received low scores. Quality scores for articles focused on health risk factors and intervention showed a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: While the overall quality of health information in Korean online newspaper articles is acceptable, room for improvement remains in some areas, particularly with regard to the fair presentation of costs, risks, and benefits. The study highlights the need for ongoing quality improvement and evaluation initiatives for online health information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Prevalence and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in South Korea Using a Large National Dataset. Low Bone Mineral Density Is Associated with High-Frequency Hearing Impairment in Women Over 50: An Observational Study in Korea. Effect of Electronic Cigarettes on the Change of Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Scores during 1-Year Follow-up. Unhealthy Alcohol Use: Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions. Usefulness of Glycated Albumin Levels in Predicting the Maternal or Neonatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during Late Pregnancy in South Korea: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1