内镜逆行胰胆管造影术清除胆管结石失败的预测因素 - 一项前瞻性研究。

Q2 Medicine Arquivos de Gastroenterologia Pub Date : 2024-03-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112
Abhishek Kamuni, Lohith Kumar, Suprabhat Giri, Sumaswi Angadi, Sunil Kumar Nanjegowda, Sukanya Bhrugumalla
{"title":"内镜逆行胰胆管造影术清除胆管结石失败的预测因素 - 一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Abhishek Kamuni, Lohith Kumar, Suprabhat Giri, Sumaswi Angadi, Sunil Kumar Nanjegowda, Sukanya Bhrugumalla","doi":"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Common bile duct (CBD) stones are known to complicate 10-15% of gallstone diseases. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the therapeutic modality of choice for bile duct clearance in CBD stones but may fail to achieve stone clearance. This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with bile duct stones undergoing ERCP at a tertiary care center were prospectively included from October 2020 to October 2021. The study's primary outcome was to identify and analyze factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (50.8% males, median age: 53.5 years) were included in the final analysis. Successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure was achieved in 70% of patients. At a cut-off stone diameter of >10.5 mm and CBD diameter of >12.5 mm, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.884, respectively, to predict failed clearance of CBD. On multivariate analysis, stone diameter ≥15 mm [odds ratio (OR) 16.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.629-176.785], location of stones in hepatic ducts (OR 7.74, 95%CI: 2.041-29.332), presence of stricture distal to stone (OR 6.99, 95%CI: 1.402-34.726) and impacted stone (OR 21.61, 95%CI: 1.84-253.058) were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stone size and location are independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance. The endoscopist should consider these factors while subjecting a patient to biliary ductal clearance to plan additional intervention.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• Failure to clear bile duct stones in the index ERCP can be seen in 15-20% of cases, and identifying the factors associated with failure is important.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• A prospective analysis was conducted to identify and analyze the factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• The present study reported a successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure in only 70% of patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• A stone diameter ≥15 mm, location of stones in hepatic ducts, presence of stricture distal to stone, and impacted stone were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35671,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PREDICTORS OF FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN CLEARING BILE DUCT STONES DURING INDEX PROCEDURE - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Kamuni, Lohith Kumar, Suprabhat Giri, Sumaswi Angadi, Sunil Kumar Nanjegowda, Sukanya Bhrugumalla\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Common bile duct (CBD) stones are known to complicate 10-15% of gallstone diseases. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the therapeutic modality of choice for bile duct clearance in CBD stones but may fail to achieve stone clearance. This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with bile duct stones undergoing ERCP at a tertiary care center were prospectively included from October 2020 to October 2021. The study's primary outcome was to identify and analyze factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (50.8% males, median age: 53.5 years) were included in the final analysis. Successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure was achieved in 70% of patients. At a cut-off stone diameter of >10.5 mm and CBD diameter of >12.5 mm, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.884, respectively, to predict failed clearance of CBD. On multivariate analysis, stone diameter ≥15 mm [odds ratio (OR) 16.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.629-176.785], location of stones in hepatic ducts (OR 7.74, 95%CI: 2.041-29.332), presence of stricture distal to stone (OR 6.99, 95%CI: 1.402-34.726) and impacted stone (OR 21.61, 95%CI: 1.84-253.058) were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stone size and location are independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance. The endoscopist should consider these factors while subjecting a patient to biliary ductal clearance to plan additional intervention.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• Failure to clear bile duct stones in the index ERCP can be seen in 15-20% of cases, and identifying the factors associated with failure is important.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• A prospective analysis was conducted to identify and analyze the factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• The present study reported a successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure in only 70% of patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>• A stone diameter ≥15 mm, location of stones in hepatic ducts, presence of stricture distal to stone, and impacted stone were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据了解,胆总管(CBD)结石并发症占胆石症的10%-15%。内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是胆总管结石患者进行胆管清石的首选治疗方式,但可能无法实现结石清除。这项前瞻性研究旨在确定ERCP清除CBD结石失败的预测因素:这项前瞻性研究旨在确定ERCP清除CBD结石失败的预测因素:2020年10月至2021年10月期间,在一家三级医疗中心接受ERCP治疗的所有胆管结石患者均被纳入前瞻性研究。研究的主要结果是确定并分析可预测胆总管结石完全清除失败的因素:共有120名患者(50.8%为男性,中位年龄:53.5岁)被纳入最终分析。70%的患者在指数手术中成功清除了CBD结石。以结石直径大于 10.5 毫米和 CBD 直径大于 12.5 毫米为临界值,预测 CBD 清除失败的 AUC 分别为 0.890 和 0.884。在多变量分析中,结石直径≥15 mm [几率比(OR)16.97,95% 置信区间(CI):1.629-176.785]、结石位置在肝管(OR 7.74,95%CI:2.041-29.332)、结石远端存在狭窄(OR 6.99,95%CI:1.402-34.726)和结石撞击(OR 21.61,95%CI:1.84-253.058)是胆管清理失败的独立预测因素:结论:结石大小和位置是胆管清理失败的独立预测因素。结论:结石大小和位置是胆管清理失败的独立预测因素,内镜医师在对患者进行胆管清理时应考虑这些因素,以制定额外的干预计划:- 背景:15%-20%的病例在ERCP检查中未能清除胆管结石,确定与失败相关的因素非常重要:- 一项前瞻性分析旨在确定和分析可预测CBD完全清除失败的因素:- 本研究报告称,仅有70%的患者在索引手术中成功清除了CBD结石:- 结石直径≥15毫米、结石位于肝管、结石远端存在狭窄以及结石撞击是胆管清除失败的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PREDICTORS OF FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN CLEARING BILE DUCT STONES DURING INDEX PROCEDURE - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are known to complicate 10-15% of gallstone diseases. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the therapeutic modality of choice for bile duct clearance in CBD stones but may fail to achieve stone clearance. This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.

Objective: This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP.

Methods: All consecutive patients with bile duct stones undergoing ERCP at a tertiary care center were prospectively included from October 2020 to October 2021. The study's primary outcome was to identify and analyze factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.

Results: A total of 120 patients (50.8% males, median age: 53.5 years) were included in the final analysis. Successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure was achieved in 70% of patients. At a cut-off stone diameter of >10.5 mm and CBD diameter of >12.5 mm, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.884, respectively, to predict failed clearance of CBD. On multivariate analysis, stone diameter ≥15 mm [odds ratio (OR) 16.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.629-176.785], location of stones in hepatic ducts (OR 7.74, 95%CI: 2.041-29.332), presence of stricture distal to stone (OR 6.99, 95%CI: 1.402-34.726) and impacted stone (OR 21.61, 95%CI: 1.84-253.058) were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.

Conclusion: Stone size and location are independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance. The endoscopist should consider these factors while subjecting a patient to biliary ductal clearance to plan additional intervention.

Background: • Failure to clear bile duct stones in the index ERCP can be seen in 15-20% of cases, and identifying the factors associated with failure is important.

Background: • A prospective analysis was conducted to identify and analyze the factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance.

Background: • The present study reported a successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure in only 70% of patients.

Background: • A stone diameter ≥15 mm, location of stones in hepatic ducts, presence of stricture distal to stone, and impacted stone were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Arquivos de Gastroenterologia (Archives of Gastroenterology), a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia IBEPEGE (Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology), Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD (Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery) and of the Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD (Brazilian Digestive Motility Society). It is dedicated to the publishing of scientific papers by national and foreign researchers who are in agreement with the aim of the journal as well as with its editorial policies.
期刊最新文献
GOOD CORRELATION BETWEEN LIVER STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT AND APRI, FIB-4, PLATELET COUNT, IN PEDIATRIC AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS. III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND. PROTON-PUMP INHIBITORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASED RISK OF MICROSCOPIC COLITIS: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. RE-THINKING FIBEROPTIC ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF SWALLOWING FOR CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA: AN EXPERT OPINION. ROBOTIC RESECTION OF A GIANT GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR (GIST): A PATH WE DARED TO TAKE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1